Andy Roddick may have fallen short in the men's final but the graceful manner in which he accepted his loss should have won him plenty of fans. Odd Andersen/Getty Images

In a nutshell, Wimbledon provided both the men's and women's games with just what they needed. With veterans retiring, the Williams sisters declining and injuries ravaging the fields, the WTA got a new star to enter the cosmos: Maria Sharapova. She's young, she's bilingual, she has a transcendent appeal and, above all, she competes with almost feral intensity. On the men's side, after years of enduring crippling parity and hearing complaints about one-dimensional bangers, the ATP now has an undisputed No. 1 in Roger Federer and a game No. 2 in Andy Roddick, who comes with a contrasting game and style. All in all, a pretty darn good tournament for the sport of tennis.

Final thoughts

That Sharapova can bludgeon the ball was no revelation. That she can summon her best tennis down 2-4 in the second set of the Wimbledon final was stunning. Can anyone else recall a fearless Monica Seles taking on the theretofore indomitable Steffi Graf as he watched Sharapova play unflinching tennis against Serena Williams?

Think it's safe to note that the "Russian Revolution" is no longer a case of quantity over quality?

Congrats to the folks at Speedminton for showing a great deal of prescience and signing Sharapova to an endorsement contract. You have to believe her agent might be fielding some additional inquiries between now and the U.S. Open.

Neither Venus nor Serena is the defending champion of a Slam for the first time since 1999.

We knew that Federer had every shot in the book -- and a good many that aren't. But his mental strength was a sign of a real evolution. Whether emerging sharper from the rain delays, playing a superior tiebreaker, or serving a bomb on match point, his unflappable nature complemented his preposterous shot-making.

Federer has set the coaching profession back 50 years.

Todd Woodbridge set a Wimbledon record, teaming with Jonas Bjorkman for his ninth men's doubles title. The defending champs beat Julian Knowle and Nenad Zimonjic in the final.

Woodbridge nearly won the mixed doubles, too. Teamed with Alicia Molik, the two couldn't convert six match points in the finals against Wayne and Cara Black.

Speaking of Cara Black, she teamed with Rennae Stubbs to win the women's title. The pair beat Liezel Huber and Ai Sugiyama in the final.

In the boys' event, France's Gael Monfils (remember the name) won yet another title, beating Miles Kasiri from England in straight sets.

In the girls' tournament, Katerina Bondarenko from the Ukraine defeated Ana Ivanovic from Serbia and Montenegro.

The gracious Americans

Roddick may have come up short in the final, but it's pretty hard to watch how he comports himself and not come away a fan. At a time when the phrase "Ugly American" has never been more in vogue, the U.S. could have a lot worse representatives at international events.

MAILBAG Jon Wertheim will answer questions from SI.com users in his mailbag each Monday. Your name: Your e-mail address: Your home town: Enter your question:

Likewise, the Williams sisters, so often cited for their arrogance, could not have been more gracious in defeat. And consider this missive we got from Sean Kavanaugh of Knaresborough, England:  As an American who has been living in England for the most part of the last 25 years, I would like to congratulate the Williams sisters as the best public relations act to come out of America for quite a while. Their interest in England's (short) participation in the European Cup in the run-up to Wimbledon, together with their appreciation of the competition they're vying for has won them many fans in the UK. It's not often these days we can admire sports figures. Well done, mom and dad.

On the other hand, a few of you made this point about Serena, and I don't disagree: It would be nice if she were a bit more politic in her post-match remarks. She beats Amelie Mauresmo 6-4 in the third set of the best women's match of the tournament. She makes 65 percent of her first serves, belts nine aces and zings a welter of winners. Does she really need to lament: "I played terribly. I just had heart ..."?

In answer to at least a dozen questions we received on this: No, we're not ready to give up on Venus.

Roddick notwithstanding, Wimbledon was a pretty disappointing tournament for the American men. With the exception of Paradorn Srichaphan, there is no top player in greater need of a solid Grand Slam than Mardy Fish. Robby Ginepri looked sharp for a few rounds but had few answers against Sebastian Grosjean while Taylor Dent again had no answer for Roddick. On the plus side, James Blake appears to be mended from his spring collision with a net post and is entered in this week's Campbell's Hall of Fame Tennis Championships in Newport, R.I.

And before we leave Wimbledon

Youth was the prevailing storyline by the end of the tournament, but age dominated the first week of the women's draw as 47-year-old Martina Navratilova won her first-round match. Navratilova did herself proud on the doubles side, too, reaching the semis alongside Lisa Raymond.

If you don't, at some level, feel for Tim Henman, consult your cardiologist immediately.

If the tennis deities have any sense of fairness, Mauresmo will win a Slam before her dance is up. (Ditto for Kim Clijsters.)

Anyone else miss the Duchess of Kent?

In the end, no one really remembers the rain delays. But the sooner that roof gets built, the better.

Anyone else (besides Doyle Srader of Texas) notice that the men's quarterfinalists came from eight different countries?

Patsy's Pizza hound, Justin Gimelstob got jobbed trying to qualify for singles, but his trip to England was still worthwhile. Teaming with Scott Humphries, he reached the quarters in doubles, beating Bob and Mike Bryan in the process.

Another Slam, another round of applause in order for Paola Suarez. A month after reaching the semifinals at Roland Garros, she cruised to the quarterfinals on grass. If the WTA gave out "Most Underrated" awards, Suarez would be a runaway winner.

Heading to Wimbledon, Florian Mayer -- a player of such a low profile he lacks a head shot on his atp.com bio -- had won $180,404 for his career. Depending on what day you do the exchange, he won about $110,000 over the last two weeks.

Having suffered through another Henman defeat, Ingo of London asked an intriguing question: Is Henman the Tim Mayotte of his generation? There are quite a lot of similarities between the two -- both are serve-and-volley players, lack a big weapon and are generally considered to be nice guys. Their career best Slam showing is a semifinal (Mayotte once, Henman five times), and Mayotte ended his career with 12 singles titles while Henman has 11.

Lost amid Martina mania: Arantxa Sanchez Vicario stealthily played mixed doubles with Jared Palmer. Alas, they lost in round one.

Andre Agassi withdrew from Wimbledon, has no interest in the Olympics (or Davis Cup), may not play the U.S. Open. But he's scheduled to play ... World Team Tennis this summer? That said, if you get a chance, check out the World Team Tennis site. This is what you get when you cross pro tennis with a county fair.

Everyone's a critic

Memo to Dick Ebersol, head of NBC Sports, we must have received 20 variations of this letter:

I'm a huge tennis fan and when matches are shown on TV, I record as many as I can. I'm pleading with you to show and broadcast as many LIVE matches as you can, and stop re-airing Serena's matches. Tomorrow in the men's quarterfinals (it's going to be an exciting day with outstanding matches) there are two matches that I would love to see LIVE and in their ENTIRETY: Lleyton Hewitt-Roger Federer and Andy Roddick-Sjeng Schalken. With NBC taking over ESPN's coverage for a few hours, viewers are not getting complete and live coverage. We get parts of matches. But at least I'm lucky to live on the East Coast. I know people that live on the West Coast, and they have told me that their coverage is horrible. Please give the entire country live coverage and show entire matches.

Thank you,
Melissa, Florida 

That said, love the Tornado Cam.

After a stellar first week, ESPN reverted to some shaky coverage choices. But a little birdie explained to us that the network was hamstrung by NBC, whose choices of coverage took precedence. In other words, when NBC demanded to air Davenport-Sharapova on tape-delay Thursday, ESPN was not allowed to show the match live.

This is the deadest of horses, but we'll beat it anyway. There's this newfound contraption called the "Internet" or, if you will, "the information superhighway." It really has a chilling effect on tape-delayed sports broadcasts. If you're enough of a tennis fan to tune into television coverage at 10 a.m. on a weekday, the odds are good you've already consulted the real-time results.

Andy Roddick, off the cuff

The high-brow, low-brow Andy Roddick was in full effect at a Wimbledon news conference:

Question: In talking to some of the people camped out waiting for tickets and hanging out, they said that a few years ago you came over to try to get a feel for the atmosphere, and that you actually got in someone's tent. Do you remember that?

Roddick: Yeah. I think it was at night when people were queuing. I just kind of wanted to do the whole atmosphere of it. They were a lot more intoxicated than I expected. I guess that made it easier to fit in. But I think, you know, I always try to experience something of a tournament. That was my first year, and I could go somewhat unrecognized, you know, by the random person. People had their little barbecues. It was cool. It was a good experience.

Question: Did you watch Serena's match with Jennifer Capriati, and were you surprised at that result?

Roddick: No. I was in the bathroom. I came out and it was done.

Want more of this week's Mailbag? Click here.

Sports Illustrated senior writer Jon Wertheim covers tennis for the magazine and is a regular contributor to SI.com.