
Dr. Z's All-ProsCloser look at players who merit recognition in 2006Posted: Friday January 5, 2007 10:21AM; Updated: Saturday January 6, 2007 1:15AM
In explaining my all-pro team, the first thing I should get out of the way is the fact that I picked Peyton Manning as my quarterback and Drew Brees as my MVP. I thought Peyton produced the finest level of play at the position, but no player did as much for his team as Brees did. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, I can go to the more or less normal selections. Where applicable I'll give you the runners-up at the various positions, and an idea of how different players graded. These grades are strictly personal, based on my own system. For offensive linemen I add a mark for every successful run block within a scheme that produces four of more yards. I deduct one for a sack allowed, a force, an assist on a sack or a stuffed-run. Then I come up with a net figure. Highest net wins. For defensive linemen I don't count up tackles, I give a mark for a move that destroys a play, even if the destroyer doesn't eventually wrap his arms and bring the runner down. I add half a point for a forced pass or an assist on someone else's sack, and a full point for a self-generated and self-fulfilled sack. Linebackers are graded more or less on the same system, except that pass defense figures in as well. The system for DB's is multi-faceted, too complicated to explain in detail. OFFENSEQUARTERBACK (Peyton Manning) RUNNING BACK (LaDainian Tomlinson) FULLBACK (Justin Griffith) Last year my man was the Redskins' Chris Cooley, an H-Back. The position, I reasoned, was "other man in the backfield," fullback or H-Back or whatever, but this year Cooley is a tight end and the fullback, who seldom started and was only spotted in and out, was Mike Sellers. Yeah, a sturdy banger on occasion, but not an all-pro. Nor was Ovie Mughelli of the Ravens, who, again, had his moments but not enough of them. Mack Strong of the Seahawks had been my pick in years past, but he's aging. I went down the league, team by team, and the best guy I found, who spent the most time on the field and made the biggest contribution, was Justin Griffith of the Falcons. At this point I'm ready to entertain all arguments, and if you start hollering Neal at me, I'd advise you to do a film study, if you have them, and watch him closely. RECEIVERS (Laveranues Coles, Marvin Harrison) Consistency was what I looked for among my final eight. So I went down the season game by game and awarded points for the guy who won each week. Not perfect, I know. They were facing different teams in different situations. Then I took each receiver's top five games and tried to put them in the context of the importance of the game and then compare them. Same problem. Then I tried to evaluate the effect each wideout had on the defense, how much he helped the overall attack. Then I backed up and did a "clutch catch" evaluation, which was almost like awarding points to divers for degree of difficulty. When I got through with everything I had Coles, who excels in the degree of difficulty, clutch catches, and Harrison, who does things so effortlessly that you lose track of how effective he really is.
1 of 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||