Get the Blackhawks Championship Package  Give the Gift of SI
SI.com HomeA CNN Network SiteSI.com Home
  • PRINT PRINT
  • EMAIL EMAIL
  • RSS RSS
  • BOOKMARK SHARE
Posted: Wednesday July 30, 2008 11:03AM; Updated: Wednesday July 30, 2008 1:51PM

Unconventional Wisdom: Angels score with deal that was a must

Story Highlights
  • The Angels added first baseman Mark Teixeira from the Braves on Tuesday
  • Teixeira fills a big hole in the middle of the Angels' lineup
  • The Angels will get two draft picks if Teixeira leaves as a free agent
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
Mark Teixeira
Mark Teixeira gives the Angels a key middle-of-the-order bat to strengthen their lineup.
Scott Cunningham/Getty Images
Team OBI Percentage Rank
Team OBI%
Twins 16.5
Pirates 15.7
Rangers 15.6
Orioles 15.3
Angels 15.0
Phillies 14.9
Astros 14.9
White Sox 14.9
Royals 14.6
Brewers 14.6
Indians 14.5
Tigers 14.5
Rockies 14.5
Marlins 14.4
Mets 14.4
D'backs 14.4
Cubs 14.4
Yankees 14.3
Dodgers 14.2
Giants 14.2
Braves 13.9
Red Sox 13.7
Reds 13.6
Rays 13.5
Cardinals 13.5
A's 13.4
Blue Jays 12.9
Mariners 12.7
Padres 12.3
Nationals 12.2

By Christina Kahrl, Baseball Prospectus

One of the tropes I tend to hammer on is that teams should be built to win in October, not simply to get there. Winning is the gift that keeps on giving, good for attendance spikes, better local market media and ad revenue, and permanent satisfaction that you've done more than someone like the Yankees or Braves lately. Who knows, it might even make you an acceptably Angeleno franchise, instead of a suburban wannabe.

This isn't going to be a paean to current Angels GM Tony Reagins versus former GM Bill Stoneman; neither man is Branch Rickey, but Stoneman presided over a World Series winner (2002), while Reagins has the ambition and the brains to do the same. By acquiring a premium first baseman, this trade will help make the difference between the Angels being merely a good team and a squad good enough to take its best shot at the cream of the better league (the American) and then stomp the senior circuit.

In practical terms, Mark Teixeira is the kind of slugger you'd love to have. Against top fireballers he'll fight off being overpowered, get in a few rips and take a base, that last representing something the Angels don't see much of; he simply murders off-speed pitchers. He's a true switch-hitter, in that he's not losing much whether he's batting righty or lefty. The Angels make a bit of a fetish of their mastery of situational hitting, and on that score you would think that Tex should fit in, having already delivered on 16.3 percent of his baserunners; ranking 96th among the 378 hitters with 100 or more PA is more good than bad, and it's definitely not like they brought in someone like Jack Cust (298th). Consider the team-level rankings for non-pitchers in OBI percentage, which measures the percentage of runners on base driven in during a batter's plate appearances. The MLB average is 14.2 (see chart, right).

All very interesting, and all very validating for the Angels' way of doing things, except Casey Kotchman wasn't a problem in this area, ranking 40th in the majors by plating 18.3 percent of his baserunners. It's instructive to put those percentages in the context of the lineups that created those opportunities; the Angels rank 11th in the league in Equivalent Average, and 12th in the league in unintentional walks drawn. Playing in that low-OBP offense, Kotchman was getting significantly fewer opportunities than Teixeira was with the Braves, with only 174 PA with runners on base while spending most of the season hitting sixth, behind the heart of the order, while Teixeira had 247 batting fourth in the DH-less league, a slot where the pitcher's hitting (and rarely reaching base) affected his total opportunities.

So all the talk about Teixeira as an RBI guy in the middle of the order is relatively unimportant, not on an Angels team that's just not going to give him that many baserunners to plate in the first place. Instead what's really going to matter are the things he can control -- the power he'll deliver and the OBP that he'll add from the middle of the order. His presence in the lineup will spare the Angels the indignity of batting Maicer Izturis third and put some lefty-hitting power between Vladimir Guerrero and Torii Hunter in the cleanup slot against right-handed pitching. Maybe that pushes Izturis to the second slot, where his past-but-not-yet present OBP skills might help maximize the value of the damage Tex can do. If not Izturis, maybe they push Howie Kendrick into the two hole and go for some short-sequence violence up front. (NOTE: I know, sabermetric orthodoxy insists that lineup order doesn't matter; I guess I keep forgetting to drink all of my Kool-Aid, especially when lineup-related research depends on so many lazy assumptions.)

The price for Teixeira -- a bullpen arm in Stephen Marek and a still not-yet-something first baseman who's going to be arbitration-eligible and is only under control for three years in Kotchman -- is definitely one worth paying, and for that the Angels are getting two months with a premium first baseman in a lineup that needed a difference-making hitter of Teixeira's caliber. Beyond that the Angels will also then get first shot at re-signing Teixeira (perhaps an attractive proposition, since the Angels are regular winners), and a pair of Type A free-agent-generated compensatory draft picks if he decides that he doesn't like the color of the Angels' money, or that California taxes just aren't what he wants to pay.

In the abstract, the picks themselves might have been worth it as a matter of repurposing Kotchman and Marek after both have come up short relative to the hopes invested in them as prospects, so from that point of view adding the two months with Tex at first base to take their best shot at winning the whole shebang just makes this that much tastier. Add in that they'll be up a spot on the 40-man over the winter, and it's a move that creates all sorts of little benefits beyond the obvious one of adding Teixeira's bat.

If there's really something to credit Reagins for, it's some combination of the following factors:

• The recognition that no matter how much Kotchman was an organizational favorite son -- literally, since his dad's in his third decade as a scout and manager in the organization -- he wasn't blossoming into the kind of premium bat you need at first base.

• Accepting the math that three years of an adequate first baseman is something you give up to get two months of one of the best at the position to maximize this team's shot at another World Series win, because an adequate Kotchman is something you can replace without any effort (with minor league first baseman Kendry Morales, perhaps).

• You didn't have to give up a blue-chip prospect to address your lineup's shortcomings. An arm to flavor the deal in an exchange of first basemen can be written off as the cost of doing business.

• You didn't settle. The Angels are playing to win, not just against their AL West rivals, but with an eye towards playing deep into October. This last might seem obvious, but Terry Ryan never figured it out in Minnesota, and nobody's suggesting that Ryan was a bad GM, just that this is an element of organizational management and opportunity management that not everyone gets.

1 2
  • PRINT PRINT
  • EMAIL EMAIL
  • RSS RSS
  • BOOKMARK SHARE
ADVERTISEMENT
SI.com
Hot Topics: NBA Playoffs NHL Playoffs Chris Johnson Jameis Winston NFL Draft Michael Sam Aldon Smith
TM & © 2013 Time Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines and ad choices.
SI CoverRead All ArticlesBuy Cover Reprint