Get the Giants Championship Package  Subscribe to SI Give the Gift of SI
SI.com HomeA CNN Network SiteSI.com Home
  • PRINT PRINT
  • EMAIL EMAIL
  • RSS RSS
  • BOOKMARK SHARE
Posted: Thursday September 4, 2008 1:42PM; Updated: Friday September 5, 2008 3:12PM

Relief Pitcher Evaluator

Story Highlights
  • Changes in the modern bullpen require changes in reliever stats
  • Four tables give an indication of the game's best relief pitchers
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
Jonathan Papelbon
By any statistical measure, Red Sox closer Jonathan Papelbon is one of the game's best.
AP
Bill James Handbook 2009
Courtesy Baseball Info Solutions

By Bill James

The following data is a sample of what will be available in the 2009 Bill James Handbook from Baseball Info Solutions, published by ACTA Sports.

The modern bullpen is still evolving rapidly. I would put it this way: If you compare a typical bullpen of 1938 to a bullpen of 1948, or compare 1948 to 1958, or 1958 to 1968, etc. until today, that in every ten year period there have been obvious changes in the way that bullpens have been staffed and used -- but that never before have those changes been as large as in the last ten years.

These rapid changes are leaving the stat books in their wake. We evaluate relievers by ERA, but a modern reliever can do a lot of damage with runs charged to somebody else. In the 1950s and 60s we developed the concept of the "Save", and since then have added the derivative concepts of "Blown Saves" and "Holds", but the modern bullpen contains one pitcher who is assigned to save the game and six or seven whose job is something else entirely -- something not measured by Saves or anything in their line.

The modern bullpen is staffed by two or three lefties whose job it is to get out lefties, by an eighth-inning guy whose job it is to be a bridge to the closer, by a seventh-inning guy, and by two or three pudknockers whose job is to pitch in where they can. You can have a lot of different guys, doing a lot of different jobs, whose records all look pretty much the same.

We're trying to stretch the record book here to cover more of the modern bullpen. The tables below have 21 categories, not counting the pitcher's name or his team, and rank the best relief pitcher from each team. These are the 21 categories: (All statistics through Sept. 21.)

Relief Games: No explanation needed

Early Entry: A count of the number of times the reliever entered the game in the sixth inning or earlier. 19% of major league relief appearances are in the sixth inning or earlier, with the leaders in early entries having numbers in the low 20s.

Consecutive Days: A count of how many times the pitcher was used after having pitched on the previous day or (in a few cases) in an earlier game on the same day. This varies with managers. Some managers avoid using relievers on consecutive days; others don't mind.

Long: Anything more than 25 pitches. Whoever leads a team in early entries will also generally lead the team in Long Outings. 20% of relief appearances are Long Outings.

Inherited Runners #: A count of the number of runners on base when the reliever entered the fray.

Inherited Runners Scored: No explanation needed.

Percentage: 31% of inherited runners score.

Easy Saves: Any Save Opportunity in which the reliever enters the game with three outs or less remaining, and the first batter he faces does not represent the potential tying or winning run. Relievers are credited with Saves in 88% of their Easy Save opportunities, and 57% of all saves are Easy Saves.

Easy Save Opportunities: The number after the dash is the number of Opportunities the pitcher has been given for an Easy Save. The number before the dash is the number of actual Easy Saves that he was credited with.

Regular Saves: Any save which does not meet the definition either of an Easy Save or a Tough Save. Major league relievers are credited with Saves in 59% of "Regular" Save Opportunities, and "Regular" Saves account for 38% of all major league saves.

Regular Save Opportunities: No explanation needed.

Tough Saves: One in which the reliever enters with the potential tying or winning run on base. Relievers are credited with Saves on only 21% of "Tough Save" Opportunities, and only 5% of Saves are Tough Saves.

Tough Saves Opportunities: No explanation needed.

Clean Outing: A game in which the reliever is not charged with a run (earned or otherwise) AND does not allow an inherited runner to score. 64% of relief appearances are Clean Outings.

BS Win: A Blown Save/Win is a "win" credited to a reliever who has blown a save opportunity. Suppose that the starter pitches 7 1/3 innings and leaves with a 3-1 lead, runner on base. The reliever gives up a home run, tying the game 3-3, but the reliever's team scores in their next at bat, making the reliever who has given up the home run the "winning" pitcher. That's a BS Win -- a Blown Save Win.

Saves: Don't make me explain the Save Rule. I know people.

Holds: A "Hold" is credited to any reliever who inherits a Save Situation, records at least one out, and passes along the Save Situation to the next reliever.

Save Opportunities: The sum of Saves and Blown Saves.

Save/Hold Percentage: The sum of Saves and Holds, divided by the sum of Saves, Holds and Blown Saves.

For several years we figured "Save Percentage", which is simply Saves divided by Save Opportunities, and this stat has some currency in the game. But the Save Percentage severely discriminates against middle relievers, who have no real chance to be credited with the Save, since they will be taken out of the game and replaced by the Closer even if they throw 110 miles an hour and strike out everybody they see. Middle relievers typically have Save Percentages of zero, even if they pitch well. The Save/Hold Percentage is a much more realistic evaluation of a pitcher's success in Save situations.

Opposition OPS: The OPS of the hitters facing the pitcher.

ERA: No explanation necessary.

NOTE: All stats are through September 2. The charts show the top reliever on each team as determined by Bill James and Steve Moyer, president of Baseball Info Solutions, using a combination of a statistical ranking system and a subjective review.

Usage

Usage (Through Sept. 2)
Pitcher Relief Games Early Entry Cons. Days Long
Joe Beimel, LAD 60 9 20 3
Heath Bell, SD 62 0 16 8
Taylor Buchholz, Col 60 0 13 5
Scott Downs, Tor 60 2 16 9
Frank Francisco, Tex 50 16 11 14
Geoff Geary, Hou 48 11 8 12
John Grabow, Pitt 61 8 13 13
Kevin Gregg, Fla 63 0 17 13
Bobby Jenks, CHW 48 0 14 2
Jim Johnson, Balt 54 3 12 12
Brad Lidge, Phi 60 0 21 6
Mike Lincoln, Cin 54 16 8 9
Carlos Marmol, CHC 71 1 24 14
Brandon Morrow, Sea 40 0 12 4
Joe Nathan, Min 58 0 18 3
Will Ohman, Atl 73 8 25 3
Jonathan Papelbon, Bos 57 0 15 4
Tony Pena, Ari 63 0 17 3
Rafael Perez, Cle 63 8 17 12
Mariano Rivera, NYY 55 0 17 5
Saul Rivera, Was 67 14 20 16
Francisco Rodriguez, LAA 65 0 26 5
Duaner Sanchez, NYM 59 3 16 4
Bobby Seay, Det 50 9 9 8
Joakim Soria, KC 54 0 16 10
Russ Springer, STL 61 13 16 4
Salomon Torres, Mil 60 5 13 11
Dan Wheeler, TB 60 1 17 5
Brian Wilson, SF 55 0 17 8
Brad Ziegler, Oak 35 7 7 9
Early Entry: Number of times reliever appeared in the sixth inning or earlier. Consecutiv Days: How many times a reliver was used in consecutive games. Long: Outings of more than 25 pitches

Inherited Runners

Inherited Runners (Through Sept. 2)
Pitcher Total Scored Pct.
Joe Beimel, LAD 48 14 .29
Heath Bell, SD 11 4 .36
Taylor Buchholz, Col 10 .1 10
Scott Downs, Tor 22 8 .36
Frank Francisco, Tex 33 .8 24
Geoff Geary, Hou 17 3 .18
John Grabow, Pitt 27 6 .22
Kevin Gregg, Fla 14 0 .0
Bobby Jenks, CHW 5 1 .20
Jim Johnson, Bal 20 3 .15
Brad Lidge, Phi 1 1 1.00
Mike Lincoln, Cin 38 9 .24
Carlos Marmol, CHC 37 5 .14
Brandon Morrow, Sea 13 4 .31
Joe Nathan, Min 8 4 .50
Will Ohman, Atl 30 6 .20
Jonathan Papelbon, Bos 24 3 .13
Tony Pena, Ari 9 2 .22
Rafael Perez, Cle 39 12 .31
Mariano Rivera, NYY 15 4 .27
Saul Rivera, Wash 34 13 .38
Francisco Rodriguez, LAA 11 3 .27
Duaner Sanchez, NYM 18 3 .17
Bobby Seay, Det 43 14 .33
Joakim Soria, KC 3 2 .67
Russ Springer, STL 45 11 .24
Salomon Torres, Mil 24 7 .29
Dan Wheeler, TB 23 4 .17
Brian Wilson, SF 21 2 .10
Brad Ziegler, Oak 19 5 .26

Saves

Saves (Through Sept. 2)
Pitcher Easy Regular Tough
Joe Beimel, LAD 0-0 0-0 0-0
Heath Bell, SD 0-0 0-2 0-3
Taylor Buchholz, Col 0-0 1-2 0-0
Scott Downs, Tor 3-3 2-3 0-1
Frank Francisco, Tex 1-1 1-5 1-3
Geoff Geary, Hou 0-0 0-1 0-1
John Grabow, Pitt 4-4 0-2 0-0
Kevin Gregg, Fla 15-17 10-16 4-5
Bobby Jenks, CHW 17-18 10-12 4-5
Jim Johnson, Bal 0-0 1-1 0-0
Brad Lidge, Phi 20-20 13-13 0-0
Mike Lincoln, Cin 0-0 0-0 0-1
Carlos Marmol, CHC 4-5 2-3 1-1
Brandon Morrow, Sea 4-5 4-5 2-2
Joe Nathan, Min 19-19 16-20 1-2
Will Ohman, Atl 1-1 0-1 0-2
Jonathan Papelbon, Bos 19-19 13-17 3-3
Tony Pena, Ari 0-1 1-3 1-1
Rafael Perez, Cle 0-0 1-2 1-5
Mariano Rivera, NYY 15-15 13-14 4-4
Saul Rivera, Wash 0-0 0-6 0-0
Francisco Rodriguez, LAA 34-37 19-21 1-1
Duaner Sanchez, NYM 0-0 0-0 0-1
Bobby Seay, Det 0-0 0-0 0-1
Joakim Soria, KC 18-18 15-17 1-2
Russ Springer, STL 0-0 0-0 0-2
Salomon Torres, Mil 15-15 9-14 2-3
Dan Wheeler, TB 5-6 3-5 2-2
Brian Wilson, SF 18-19 14-16 4-4
Brad Ziegler, Oak 0-0 6-6 0-0
Easy = Reliever enters with three outs or fewer remaining and first batter does not represent tying or winning run. Regular = Standard definition Tough = Reliever enters with potential tying or winning run on base

Relief Results

Relief Results (Through Sept. 2)
Pitcher Clean BS Win Saves Holds Opps. Sv/Hld Pct. Opp OPS ERA
Joe Beimel, LAD 42 0 0 11 0 1.00 .697 2.20
Heath Bell, SD 49 1 0 20 5 .80 .599 3.03
Taylor Buchholz, Col 46 0 1 20 2 .95 .523 1.84
Scott Downs, Tor 50 0 5 21 7 .93 .531 1.25
Frank Francisco, Tex 32 0 3 12 9 .71 .670 3.56
Geoff Geary, Hou 37 0 0 10 2 .83 .567 2.48
John Grabow, Pitt 44 0 4 12 6 .89 .652 3.00
Kevin Gregg, Fla 46 2 29 0 38 .76 .604 3.79
Bobby Jenks, CHW 40 0 27 0 30 .90 .575 1.82
Jim Johnson, Bal 40 0 1 19 1 1.00 .539 2.23
Brad Lidge, Phi 49 0 33 0 33 1.00 .561 2.18
Mike Lincoln, Cin 36 1 0 10 1 .91 .707 4.60
Carlos Marmol, CHC 54 1 7 25 9 .94 .484 2.58
Brandon Morrow, Sea 34 0 10 3 12 .87 .504 1.47
Joe Nathan, Min 50 0 36 0 41 .88 .521 1.11
Will Ohman, Atl 57 0 1 17 4 .86 .646 3.38
Jonathan Papelbon, Bos 42 1 35 0 39 .90 .507 1.68
Tony Pena, Ari 44 0 2 23 5 .89 .723 3.90
Rafael Perez, Cle 39 1 2 20 7 .81 .609 3.31
Mariano Rivera, NYY 43 0 32 0 33 .97 .448 1.46
Saul Rivera, Wash 40 1 0 16 6 .73 .661 3.57
Francisco Rodriguez, LAA 53 1 54 0 59 .92 .615 2.43
Duaner Sanchez, NYM 44 0 0 21 1 .95 .615 2.43
Bobby Seay, Det 32 0 0 10 1 .91 .742 3.74
Joakim Soria, KC 45 1 34 0 37 .92 .540 1.86
Russ Springer, STL 46 0 0 11 2 .85 .620 2.45
Salomon Torres, Mil 39 3 26 5 32 .84 .612 2.47
Dan Wheeler, TB 43 1 10 26 13 .92 .569 2.59
Brian Wilson, SF 39 1 36 0 39 .92 .667 4.00
Brad Ziegler, Oak 28 0 6 9 6 1.00 .514 0.57
Clean = An appearance in which a reliever is not charged with a run and does not allow an inherited runner to score. BS win = An appearance in which a reliever is credited with a win even after blowing a save. Hold = Credited when a reliever enters in a save situation, records an out, and passes the save situation to the next reliever. Opp OPS = Opponents on-base plus slugging percentage

The Bill James Handbook will be released on November 1 and can be purchased at http://www.actasports.com

 
  • PRINT PRINT
  • EMAIL EMAIL
  • RSS RSS
  • BOOKMARK SHARE
ADVERTISEMENT
SI.com
Hot Topics: Tiger Woods Jeremy Lin Peyton Manning Davis Cup SI Swimsuit
Turner - SI Digital Copyright © 2010 Time Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines and ad choices.
SI CoverRead All ArticlesBuy Cover Reprint