Get the Blackhawks Championship Package  Give the Gift of SI
SI.com Home
  • PRINT PRINT
  • EMAIL EMAIL
  • RSS RSS
  • BOOKMARK SHARE
Posted: Thursday November 20, 2008 2:57PM; Updated: Thursday November 20, 2008 3:27PM

Mythbusters: This'll Cost You

Story Highlights

Once again, this season will end with a logjam of one-loss teams atop the BCS

Title game hopefuls who have played FCS opponents will be at a disadvantage

Losses to FCS teams are disastrous, and wins can mean little more than byes

By Phil Guidry

Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
texas-tech-umass-p1.jpg
Texas Tech's on-track for a BCS title-game berth, but if the Red Raiders end up with one loss, their two games against FCS opponents could cost them that shot.
Karl Anderson/Icon SMI

Once again, we've got a good, old-fashioned, one-loss logjam near the top of the BCS standings, which means sometime soon the national focus will turn to each team's "body of work." And even though the advice we're about to dispense will come too late for this year's contenders, maybe it will help steer future national-title aspirants in the right direction.

Playing I-AA opponents is a good idea

First, a bit of clarification: The terms 'I-A' and 'I-AA' are technically outdated. But so is college football's system for determining a national champion, so we're sticking with them anyway. 'I-A' is now officially 'FBS' (Football Bowl Subdivision) and 'I-AA' is now 'FCS' (Football Championship Subdivision), thereby satiating the public's endless longing for an even more confusing way to group college football teams. But we're using the more traditional 'I-A' and 'I-AA' designations, because they're more familiar and sensible. And if doing so happens to stymie the NCAA's clumsy attempt at re-branding, that's an added bonus.

One other thing about I-A and I-AA programs: That distinction has to do with a convoluted formula dealing with school enrollment, athletic-department budgets, home-game attendance, political influence and deftness in filling out paperwork. It has virtually nothing to do with how good a football program actually is. If it did, Washington State would probably be I-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

Scheduling I-AA opponents is all the rage these days, especially since those wins once again count toward bowl eligibility. And like recreational drugs in a dorm room (we know, drugs are illegal and nobody actually ever breaks the law), everybody's doing it. Since the advent of the BCS, only two teams from BCS conferences plus Notre Dame have never scheduled a I-AA opponent.

These I-AA teams are supposed to roll into town and play cannon fodder, often for Homecoming or Parents' Weekend. They're supposed to be less lively than tackling dummies. These are the Saturdays in which that fifth-string tailback who can't even carry the athletic tape without fumbling tucks his mullet under his helmet and rumbles in for a two-yard touchdown he'll one day bore his grandkids to tears remembering.

In other words, the I-AA opponents in these affairs are like the groom at a wedding: a necessary piece of the puzzle, but little more than a prop, a part of the scenery.

So why, then, are big-time I-A programs foolish to schedule their I-AA brethren? It's not even for the most obvious reason, which is that every now and then the I-AA team politely cashes its paycheck and then impolitely pulls a historic upset (cough*AppState*cough).

No, it's because not only do they not help a team's BCS ranking, their perceived weakness can actually cause that ranking to take a hit. In the realpolitik of the BCS, a win over a I-AA team is at best the equivalent of a bye and at worst a virtual loss. And sometimes, it's even an actual loss (cough*AppState*cough). The media used to blindly praise these lopsided wins, but now these games are picked apart and analysts question why they were scheduled in the first place.

This is not meant as a slight against I-AA (not a major slight, at least). I-AA fans and programs are just as passionate and steeped in tradition as their generally larger, money-grubbing counterparts. And even when they don't manage to pull off an upset for the ages (cough*AppState*cough), they are known to provide a stiff early season test (as North Carolina learned when it barely escaped I-AA McNeese State earlier in the season). And I-AA football has something I-A cannot touch: actual playoffs that crown a legitimate champion.

The problem lies with public perception of these teams, and the havoc they can wreak on top I-A teams' computer averages. To see how this might come into play this season, let's look at every non-Big 12 fan's second favorite team, that rowdy, gun-slinging Texas Tech squad.

The Red Raiders have been a breath of fresh air this season, from their swashbuckling head coach Mike Leach to Graham Harrell and Michael Crabtree's last-second heroics. But a Tech loss to Oklahoma on Saturday would create a three-way tie in the Big 12 South between the Sooners, Red Raiders and Texas Longhorns, with the tiebreaker going to whichever team has the highest BCS ranking. In a beauty contest where every opponent and every quarter is scrutinized, here's the dirty little truth about the Red Raiders: Two of their wins are over I-AA opponents, Eastern Washington and Massachusetts. Even though they've played remarkably well in the sport's toughest division, if their one-loss résumé gets stacked up next to several others, those two wins could do almost as much harm as the one loss.

1 2
  • PRINT PRINT
  • EMAIL EMAIL
  • RSS RSS
  • BOOKMARK SHARE
ADVERTISEMENT
SI.com
Hot Topics: NBA Playoffs NHL Playoffs Golden State Warriors Bryce Harper Paul Pierce Masai Ujiri
TM & © 2013 Time Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines and ad choices.
SI CoverRead All ArticlesBuy Cover Reprint