Get the Blackhawks Championship Package  Give the Gift of SI
SI.com Home
  • PRINT PRINT
  • EMAIL EMAIL
  • RSS RSS
  • BOOKMARK SHARE
Posted: Wednesday December 10, 2008 3:39PM; Updated: Thursday December 11, 2008 8:59AM

Quick Slants: The "de facto" factor

Story Highlights

Let's drop the de facto "the regular season in a playoff" argument for good

Around Ohio State, BCS is an acronyn "Blagojevich Corruption Scandal"

Drinking on New Year's will help dull the pain the Orange Bowl will cause

By Ty Hildenbrandt

Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
The Alabama-Florida SEC title-game clash was so good, many viewers and analysts felt like they were watching a semifinal playoff game.
The Alabama-Florida SEC title-game clash was so good, many viewers and analysts felt like they were watching a semifinal playoff game.
AP

Pop quiz: What makes every playoff proponent whinier than Mack Brown at a Ne-Yo concert?

Answer: The "de facto playoff" argument.

Last Saturday, with Florida and Alabama doing battle for an SEC crown and a BCS title game berth, it was difficult to watch more than five minutes of football without hearing about the "national semifinal" taking place in the Georgia Dome. Naturally, ESPN was more than happy to jump on the bandwagon in light of its $500 million deal to broadcast the BCS starting in 2011. CBS followed suit. Indeed, Saturday was a de facto holiday for the "de facto playoff" argument, and it was a slightly less logical development than National High Five Day.

The notion among BCS proponents is that college football's regular season is just like a double-elimination playoff. Lose once and you're against the wall; lose twice and you're toast. This system, the proponents say, is more grueling than the NFL's; a 12-week playoff in which every game counts is far more grueling than a setup that lets a team lose eight games and still have a fighting chance.

But the assertion that this was a "de facto semifinal" is flawed and implies that there was another semifinal being played somewhere else in the country. To my knowledge, there was not. It also implies that teams advance based on merit and not, you know, supercomputers running Einsteinian formulas.

In fact, the argument as a whole has some glaring issues. For starters, a real playoff is based on a "try out" or regular season, which ensures worthy teams are pitted against other worthy, championship-level opponents each step of the way. In other words, Alabama would never be playing Western Kentucky unless the Hilltoppers earned the right to play the Crimson Tide. Get it? As it stands now, college football is trying out and playing off at the same time.

Furthermore, with playoff-caliber schedules, a true tournament assumes that all losses are created equal. Losing early is no different than losing late. But that's not exactly the case, is it?

And finally, with a true playoff, the implication is two teams will be left standing in the end to play for a championship. This year, my friends, you could make a case for nine.

Yup, it's time we debunked this myth once and for all. This argument isn't a real argument at all. It's a crutch for the ignorant.

FUN WITH ACRONYMS: BCS = BLAGOJEVICH CORRUPTION SCANDAL?

You know, in the wake of an embarrassing corruption scandal in the Midwest, it's also worth noting Ohio State managed to secure a multi-million dollar BCS bid despite falling short of its conference title and beating only one team currently ranked in the top 20. Just sayin'...

The bottom line: If Ohio State had the brand recognition of Northwestern or Minnesota, the Fiesta Bowl would be seeing a different pairing. There's just no way around it -- this decision was based solely on money. (Anyone who thinks otherwise should know I'm willing to spot the Buckeyes at least 14 points in a hefty, New Year's wager.)

FINALLY, A GOOD CASE FOR A DEBILITATING HANGOVER ON JANUARY 1ST

A word to the wise: If you're debating taking that extra shot of Wild Turkey on New Year's Eve, you should definitely go for it. Aside from the fact that your friends will christen you as "effin' crazy" for actually drinking Wild Turkey, you'll be primed to fall asleep by 7:00 the following night and spare yourself the unbridled agony of the 2009 Orange Bowl.

Yes, for as exciting as "VIRGINIA TECH! CINCINNATI! ONLY ON FOX!" may sound, it's just a tad difficult to get psyched up for this game. Not sure why that is. Despite the fact that the game has both the ratings draw and Cinderella appeal of From Justin to Kelly, I'm just not feeling it. In fact, unless you're a staunch Hokie or Bearcat fan -- has there ever been a battle between two stranger mascots? -- there's a good chance this seems a lot like year 25 in your NCAA '09 franchise, when teams like North Texas and Bowling Green start breaking the top five and playing each other for the national championship.

1 2
  • PRINT PRINT
  • EMAIL EMAIL
  • RSS RSS
  • BOOKMARK SHARE
ADVERTISEMENT
SI.com
Hot Topics: NBA Playoffs NHL Playoffs Chris Johnson Jameis Winston NFL Draft Michael Sam Aldon Smith
TM & © 2013 Time Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines and ad choices.
SI CoverRead All ArticlesBuy Cover Reprint