Posted: Tuesday July 20, 2010 11:58AM ; Updated: Tuesday July 20, 2010 11:58AM
Britt Robson
Britt Robson>INSIDE THE NBA

The worst moves of the offseason

Story Highlights

The Raptors made a big investment in unproven power forward Amir Johnson

Atlanta's Joe Johnson and Memphis' Rudy Gay received questionable max deals

The defensive-minded Bucks may regret the acquisition of Corey Maggette

Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
amare-stoudemire.knicks.jpg
New Knick Amar'e Stoudemire is one of the game's best finishers, but will that remain the case without Steve Nash feeding him?
Andrew D. Bernstein/NBAE via Getty Images

There are many ways to screw up a basketball team. Sign a mere star at a superstar's pay grade. Acquire players solely on the basis of talent, with no clue how they will fit together. Disrupt a jelling roster or stand pat with one that is at or near its peak without a championship in sight. Hire a coach or general manager whose skills and personality aren't sufficient to address the needs of the franchise. Or just be cursed and unlucky.

Just as surely as some teams have sagely secured the pieces over the summer that will foster or hasten their ascent up the standings, others have shopped unwisely, forestalling momentum and laying the groundwork for more groundwork. Here's one person's opinion of the 10 worst offseason moves so far, in no particular order. In each case, I'd be happy to be proved wrong -- better teams make for more enjoyable competition.

Knicks give Amar'e Stoudemire a five-year, $100 million deal as part of a sign-and-trade with the Suns

The Knicks obviously hoped the early agreement with Stoudemire -- his deal was announced on July 5, three days before it could become official -- would cajole LeBron James or another major free agent into joining him. It is nobody's fault that a second star couldn't be added, and defenders of this signing point out that Amar'e's presence makes the Knicks more desirable for a top free agent like Tony Parker or Carmelo Anthony next year.

Yes, keep hope alive, but let's look at the $100 million bird the Knicks have in hand. Stoudemire's justified reputation as the game's most unstoppable force going to the basket on the pick-and-roll was accomplished with the magician Steve Nash as his partner on that play. Raymond Felton, New York's new starting point guard, is slightly above-average league-wide, but can't come close to duplicating Nash's deadeye accuracy from long range (which gave Amar'e room to operate down low) or Nash's knack for perfectly timed, split-second ball delivery.

Health is another concern. Stoudemire, one of the NBA's quintessential leapers, has had microfracture surgery and wears goggles to protect a repaired retina that is always vulnerable to a career-ending jolt. Then there is the matter of attitude. Stoudemire was occasionally thin-skinned about criticism in Phoenix and may have trouble handling the media pressure cooker in New York. It also remains to be seen whether he retains his belated commitment to defense, which made him one of the NBA's best all-around players in the second half of last season, but has otherwise been a glaring weakness. Put simply, more will be asked of him than ever before, yet the supporting cast is the weakest of his career. That's not a recipe for success.

Raptors re-sign Amir Johnson to a five-year, $34 million deal

Just 23, Johnson has intriguing potential. The 6-foot-9 power forward was one of the Raptors' few quality defenders last season -- according to 82games.com, Toronto's opponents scored eight fewer points per 100 possessions when he was on the court than when he sat. He also shot 63.8 percent from the field, albeit in short stints (he averaged only 17.7 minutes), and in part because of his limited range.

And that's the rub: The Raptors are gambling a lot of money on a player with a limited sample size who doesn't seem like a great fit in terms of their needs. More specifically, Johnson has "played" five NBA seasons, but languished on the bench early in the tenure with Detroit and has just 3,291 career minutes -- the equivalent of slightly more than one season for a solid NBA starter. While he plays the same position as the departed Chris Bosh, he lacks Bosh's bulk (he's listed at just 210 pounds), not an ideal situation because the Raptors are committed at center to Andrea Bargnani, a sweet shooter but not a physical presence. Toronto also used its top draft pick on a thin power forward, 6-10 Ed Davis of North Carolina.

Scant experience and the prospect of an undersized frontcourt with Johnson and Bargnani make giving Johnson a healthy raise and a long deal seem overly pricey. Didn't the Raptors learn their lesson overpaying Hedo Turkoglu?

Hawks re-sign Joe Johnson to a six-year, $124 million deal

This is a spectacularly dumb move by Atlanta. Less than three months ago, Johnson was booed off his home court after "helping" the Hawks suffer the most lopsided four-game sweep in NBA history (to Orlando, by an average margin of more than 25 points per game). Disappearing as a positive force when the games mattered most, Johnson shot just 30 percent and averaged 12.8 points during the series while delivering fewer assists and committing more turnovers than he did in the regular season. He also had the temerity to criticize Hawks fans for booing the team during a 30-point home loss in Game 3 -- earlier in the season, he had complained about the lack of enthusiasm and atmosphere for basketball in Atlanta.

After a fifth straight year of regular-season improvement, the Hawks had struggled to defeat a vastly inferior Bucks team (minus star Andrew Bogut) in the first round, renewing questions about their immaturity and lack of a killer instinct. If nothing else, the Orlando massacre demonstrated that the Hawks couldn't be regarded as serious contender for a championship if Johnson was their best player.

In response, Atlanta signed Johnson to the most expensive contract of the summer, a deal that will become more onerous with each passing season. Defenders of the move claim the Hawks couldn't afford the dramatic setback of Johnson's departure after their slow but steady climb from the depths of a 13-win season in 2004-05. But what was really at stake here? Johnson and Atlanta's fan base already have a relationship that is both fractious and indifferent (the 53-win team finished 18th in attendance last season), and the signing merely creates a more expensive status quo while hindering chances for significant future upgrades. At 29, Johnson is already well into his prime; it is almost certain that his first five years with the Hawks have been more productive than what he can generate in his next six.

Meanwhile, as the Heat and Bulls get better and the Magic and Celtics remain formidable, the Hawks have to hope that last year's shameful pratfall was all departed coach Mike Woodson's fault.

Bucks trade for Corey Maggette and then re-sign John Salmons to a five-year, $39 million deal

Many people seem really excited about Milwaukee's offseason moves. But my view is that having both Maggette and Salmons shows an unhealthy preference for ball hogs over ball hounds. Re-signing Salmons alone would have been OK. Maggette, on his own, is not as good a fit on this roster as Salmons. But signing both could disrupt the defensive synergy that Scott Skiles created last season.

Maggette is a scoring machine who gets to the free-throw line as well as any wing player in the NBA, a Bucks weakness last season. He averaged 19.8 points by shooting 51.6 percent from the field and 83.5 percent on an eye-opening 7.9 free-throw attempts per game for Golden State last season. But, according to 82games.com, this did not translate into success for the Warriors. Maggette played nearly half of his team's minutes, and during that time, Golden State was outscored by 289 points. When Maggette sat, however, the Warriors were bested by a mere six points. The Warriors were -- and are -- better off with out him.

 
SI.com
Hot Topics: NBA Playoffs NHL Playoffs NFL schedule LaMarcus Aldridge Michael Pineda Phil Jackson Tiger Woods
TM & © 2014 Time Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines, your California privacy rights, and ad choices.
SI CoverRead All ArticlesBuy Cover Reprint