Federer bested Nadal in London, but 2011 will bring Rafa Slam
Roger Federer's victory over Rafael Nadal was heavenly, but the setting wasn't
Nadal goes into 2011 as a solid No. 1 with a shot to complete a calendar slam
Two players deserving mention retired in 2010, Elena Dementieva and Taylor Dent
Ten thoughts on the ATP Tour World Finals, culminating Sunday with Roger Federer's convincing 6-3, 3-6, 6-1 victory over Rafael Nadal ...
1. Even with a 6-1 finish, this was spectacular entertainment. It came at the wrong time of year, in an improper setting, but the scintillating first-set exchanges -- drawing gasps of admiration from ESPN analyst Patrick McEnroe -- made the telecast worthwhile. Nobody snaps a cross-court backhand like Federer, and few could even dream of Nadal's ability to turn a difficult baseline short-hop into an absolute bullet forehand down the line.
2. Colleague Jon Wertheim summed it up perfectly: "Anyone questioning the health of tennis wasn't in London last week." It must have been heavenly to be there. From the standpoint of sophistication, international glamour and celebrity influence, the crowds at London's 02 Arena were penthouse quality.
The rest of the world? Bored, confused, or perhaps not even aware the event was taking place. It got terrible media coverage, as always, because the general public shuts down interest at the close of the U.S. Open -- exactly when the tennis tours should end. Insiders can marvel all they want about the game's endless appeal, but they can't see past the money, the exotic venues, the lifestyle in general. Sports fans need their sports to disappear for a while, if only to celebrate a sense of renewal when they return.
Besides, this "year-end championship" didn't decide a damn thing. There's nothing "ultimate" or reputation-changing about it. Nadal was clearly the No. 1 player in 2010. Federer will always be the one capable of playing the best all-around tennis. Andy Roddick came up short, Tomas Berdych wasn't prepared for the moment, Andy Murray mixed pure genius with inexcusable malaise ... what else did you need to know?
3. Tennis fans are used to classic outdoor settings when things really get important. The London arena came across as a weird sort of blue-on-blue affair, perhaps lifted from the Disney catalogue. It was wonderful television if you like aquariums.
4. The two all-time greats may not face each other indoors for another five years, but if they do, bet on Federer (not you, Teddy Forstmann) every time. Nadal's at his best with a bit of a breeze at hand, something he can easily overpower, while he literally immerses his body in a patch of red clay. Give Federer an indoor surface, no wind and a bit of motivation, and it's all over.
5. They must be joking with that format. As the round-robin event unfolded, wins were deceiving, losses were acceptable, and few people knew exactly where things stood. Put it this way: In an eight-man field, Roddick lost his first two matches and still had a chance to win. Preposterous.
6. All you need to know about the season running too long: For the first time all year -- perhaps his entire career -- Nadal looked flat and disheartened at the finish. He's the stampeding warrior who fights for every point, yet as Federer's climactic forehand sailed long (most of the fans seemed to feel that way), Nadal just surrendered. He's far too classy to make excuses in defeat, but tennis.com's Pete Bodo said Nadal's voice "creaked with fatigue" in the post-match interview. It was highly encouraging to see the ATP extend its off-season to seven weeks, but as Federer said, it's only "a step in the right direction." At least Novak Djokovic is on cruise control. He has all of, what, 20 minutes to get ready for the Davis Cup final?
7. As Federer's off-and-on year unfolded, a number of insiders felt he could noticeably improve by charging the net more. He clearly took that to heart under new coach Paul Annacone, who did so much good work with Pete Sampras. Federer's volleying on Sunday was simply elegant. McEnroe and broadcast partner Cliff Drysdale drew comparisons to Stefan Edberg, John McEnroe and Rod Laver.
8. How do you characterize the Federer-Nadal rivalry? Does it resemble any you've seen in the past? There's no question it's based on deep, sincere respect. Federer realizes he'll never match Nadal's brutally relentless mindset, and Nadal knows that Federer plays the most beautiful game. But the element of friendship has become startlingly pervasive.
A couple of months ago, the two men filmed a TV spot and fell into hopeless fits of laughter, a can't-miss bit of viewing (on YouTube) for any sports fan. Then there was Nadal, late Sunday, explaining that, "We have a great relationship all the time, no? The only way it can improve is being closer and closer, because we spend more time together ... so I think is not a rivalry."
9. Nadal loves to work on Federer's backhand, particularly up high. Federer had every answer this time, routinely crushing winners at crucial times. Can't wait for their next match on clay, where the high bounces so perfectly suit Nadal's strategy.
10. Nadal owns nine major titles as the tennis year ends. When the tour starts preparing for Wimbledon next summer, he'll have 11. He'll be intensely motivated to turn the Australian Open into a "Rafa Slam" -- the distinction of holding all four major titles at once -- and nobody's beating him in Paris.
NHL playoff preview: New York Rangers vs. Philadelphia Flyers
NHL playoff preview: Los Angeles Kings vs. San Jose Sharks