SI.com Home
Get SI's Duke Championship Package Free  Subscribe to SI Give the Gift of SI
Posted: Wednesday February 10, 2010 4:32PM; Updated: Wednesday February 10, 2010 4:37PM
Frank Deford
Frank Deford>VIEWPOINT

This is figure skating? Go figure

Story Highlights

Figure skating's new scoring system is confusing, removes artistry from sport

System gave Rachel Flatt controversial win at last month's National Championships

Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
flatt-nagasu.jpg
Mirai Nagasu (left) skated a pristine program last month in Spokane, but lost out on gold to Rachael Flatt by ... 11.33 points?
Heinz Kluetmeier/SI

Remember the town in Vietnam that, they said, had to be destroyed in order to be saved? Something like that applies very well to figure skating, a sport with a judging system was so corrupt that changes had to be made. Unfortunately, instead of trusting that they could change the judges, they changed the whole system, and thereby destroyed the sport's popularity.

Ah, the old system, where perfection was a six -- remember? And here came the judges' marks one after another: 5.8 ... 5.7 ... 5.9! It was as dramatic as an Oscar envelope, as simple as a touchdown and the cheers and sighs would roll out. For years, the Olympic figure skating championships were about the only other competition to approach Super Bowl ratings. Figure skating was the tentpole that held up the whole Winter Olympics.

The prime purpose of the new and unimproved scoring system was to better quantify the various elements in a program -- required jumps and spins--- so that the famously nefarious judges would have less latitude to cheat. Alas, this created a scoring system so arcane that, by comparison, it makes computing the Standard and Poor's index child's play. Moreover, by emphasizing compulsory obligations, the new system diminished the emphasis on artistry.

To me, what always made figure skating so special was that it came at that wonderful confluence of art and athletics. Of course, to a lot of Americans who think 350-pound slugs momentarily grappling at the line of scrimmage is the essence of athleticism, figure skating, with music and sequins to boot, just isn't a real sport. Yeah, try it out there all by yourself for 4½ minutes, jumping and spinning on a blade -- and having to do it all in time to the music.

Worse, in forcing an emphasis on the basics, the new rules reward playing it safe, celebrating the ordinary, rather than risking the difficult. And grace has been ostracized. The other day I asked Johnny Weir, the most lyrical of American skaters, how much time he could really afford to show off his original artistry in a long program.

"Ten seconds," he replied straightaway. Ten seconds out of 4½ minutes to express himself in a sport where expression was as much the glory as axels and salchows were the power.

At our national championships three weeks ago, virtually the entire audience rose in acclaim, thinking Mirai Nagasu had won with a lovely, fluid performance. The air went out of the arena when the judges' tally gave the victory to Rachael Flatt, who'd skated merely safe and solid. Oh yeah, the score: 200.11 to 188.78. Who knew?

Figure skating used to attract tens of millions of dollars in rights fees from TV. Not anymore. The ice shows are going the way of vaudeville. NBC might lose as much as $200 million on these Vancouver Games. Obviously, part of the reason for that is the economy but, sadly, as the soul has been legislated out of figure skating, so, too, has the heart of the Games been stolen from the Winter Olympics.

ADVERTISEMENT
YES, I WILL TAKE THE SURVEY

MAYBE LATER

NO THANKS
SI.com
Hot Topics: NBA Playoffs UFC 146 Indianapolis 500 Landon Donovan French Open NHL Playoffs SI Swimsuit
Turner - SI Digital
Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines, your California privacy rights, and ad choices.
SI CoverRead All ArticlesBuy Cover Reprint