Posted: Wednesday December 14, 2011 2:18PM ; Updated: Wednesday December 14, 2011 2:31PM
Cliff Corcoran
Cliff Corcoran>INSIDE BASEBALL

Hot Stove Roundup: One smart signing, one questionable trade

Story Highlights

The D-backs strengthened their rotation with Trevor Cahill, but paid a high price

Aramis Ramirez could be a good low-cost solution for Prince Fielder in Milwaukee

The Rays locked up top pitching prospect Matt Moore with a five-year deal

Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
Trevor Cahill went 18-8 with a 2.97 ERA in 2011, but was significantly less effective away from Oakland Coliseum.
Trevor Cahill went 18-8 with a 2.97 ERA in 2011, but was significantly less effective away from Oakland Coliseum.
AP

This week's Hot Stove Roundup finds one division champion making a questionable attempt to upgrade its rotation, another making a smart move to compensate for a departing superstar, and a perennial playoff club helping to solidify that status with what could prove to be one of the smartest long-term contracts in the game.

Trades and Upgrades

Diamondbacks acquire SP Trevor Cahill, RP Craig Breslow and cash from A's for RHP Jarrod Parker, OF Collin Cowgill and RP Ryan Cook; non-tender SP Joe Saunders and RHP Micah Owings

The core of the above is that the Diamondbacks, in an effort to repeat as National League West champions, sent one of their top pitching prospects, 2007 first-round pick Jarrod Parker, to the A's to upgrade from Saunders to Cahill. That seems like a mistake to me. Cahill, 23, may be younger, and temporarily cheaper, with the 30-year-old Saunders eligible for arbitration coming off a $5.5 million salary in 2011 and signed for the next four years with options to keep him in Arizona through 2017. But Parker is younger (though only by eight months) and cheaper than Cahill, who will make $3.5 million in 2012, followed by annual increases to $12 million in 2015. Parker is also likely to be better once he's established in the majors, and the A's receive all six of his team-controlled seasons.

Meanwhile, it's not clear that Cahill will be a significant step up from Saunders in 2012. Cahill's big 2010 season (18-8, 2.97 ERA) was largely the result of opponent's .237 average on balls in play, and in three major league seasons, his ERAs outside of pitching-friendly Oakland Coliseum have been 5.10, 3.86 and 5.23, respectively. Cahill could benefit from moving to the weaker league, but he's also entering a hitter's park. Saunders posted a 3.85 ERA in two seasons with the Diamondbacks, including a 3.97 career mark at Chase Field. I see both as league-average pitchers with low strikeout rates. Cahill is certainly young enough that he could improve, whereas Saunders likely won't.

On the other hand, Parker is a potential No. 2 starter who could be ready to join a major league rotation as early as next season, and was too high a price to pay given the risk. If the Diamondbacks exercise both of Cahill's options, the they could wind up paying more for Cahill over the next six years ($55.2 million) than they would have paid for one more season of Saunders followed by six of Parker, meaning they could wind up spending more money for one fewer year of ultimately inferior pitching. Breslow provides the Diamondbacks with a second lefty in the bullpen, though one with a fairly neutral platoon split.

The A's -- likely nonfactors in 2012 anyway -- receive three players with six seasons of team control remaining, including a potential front-end starter in Parker. Cowgill is a stocky fourth outfielder who can play center, get on base, steal and hit for power, but none to a level that make him a viable starter for a contender. Cook is a fairly generic righty reliever, but his mid-90s fastball and slider should play in the majors. Cowgill, 25, and Cook, 24, made their major league debuts in 2011, but are both still technically rookies. Owings is an unexceptional swing man, but a .286/.313/.507 hitter in 217 career plate appearances. I'm still waiting for a team to turn him into a first baseman.

Brewers sign 3B Aramis Ramirez ($36M/3yrs and a mutual option for 2015), trade 3B Casey McGehee to Pirates for RP Jose Veras

Ramirez turns 34 in June, and has been both healthy and productive just once over the last three seasons. But as a low-cost solution to replacing Prince Fielder, whose departure from Milwaukee this deal all but clinches, he's a good one. Fielder and McGehee were worth a combined 4.2 wins above replacement in 2011 according to Baseball-Reference's WAR (5.2 for Fielder, -1.0 for McGehee). Ramirez was worth 3.6 and averaged 4.4 bWAR in 2008 and 2009.

The Brewers still need a first baseman, but it won't take much from that player to sufficiently replace Fielder and McGehee, whether 26-year-old Mat Gamel, a .310/.372/.540 hitter at Triple-A Nashville last season, or an outside addition such as Carlos Peņa (an average 2.0 bWAR the last four seasons), fills the role. Fielder will likely pull a contract in excess of $150 million. Spending $36 million on Ramirez, particularly given he was the only impact third baseman on the market, looks very smart in Milwaukee right now.

The Ramirez solution also makes last week's Alex Gonzalez signing look even better. Ramirez is a statue at third base, and the Brewers' shortstop will have to cover a lot of ground. Gonzalez does that well. As for Veras, he's a fairly generic hard-throwing righty reliever who strikes out a lot of hitters (more than 10 K/9IP last two years) but walks nearly as many (4.8 BB/9 over the same span and over his career). Since McGehee had fallen below replacement level last year and was benched throughout the playoffs, he's a solid return. The Pirates have little to lose, and can take a chance on a potential rebound while using him for depth at the infield corners.

Cardinals re-sign SS Rafael Furcal ($14M/2yrs), avoid arbitration with 2B/OF Skip Schumaker ($3M/2yrs), non-tender IF Ryan Theriot

Furcal took Theriot's starting shortstop job after coming over from Dodgers in a deadline deal for minor league outfielder Alex Castellanos. By subsequently agreeing to a pay cut for the security of a two-year deal, Furcal, who made $12 million last season and had his $12 million option declined after the World Series, allowed the Cardinals to dump Theriot entirely following a season in which he made $3.3 million for replacement-level play. Furcal's performance was a significant upgrade down the stretch, but over past five seasons, it's been as erratic as his attendance. The 34-year-old is almost guaranteed to miss time due to injury, and has played in 100 or more games just once in the last four seasons with chronic back pain and other ailments. Furcal's upside is significant, particularly relative to Theriot's. But even $7 million per year seems to be a gamble on such a marked uncertainty.

Schumaker, after three years at the keystone, has shown mild improvements in the field. His bat has disappeared, though, making him a replaceable entering his fourth season as the Cardinals' starting second baseman. He'd be more valuable as a reserve given his ability to play all three outfield positions and his pronounced platoon split.

Planning for the Future

Rays sign Matt Moore to extension ($14M/5yrs + three option years)

Matt Moore signed a five-year extension after starting just one regular-season game for the Rays in 2011.
Matt Moore signed a five-year extension after starting just one regular-season game for the Rays in 2011.
Max Faulkner/ZUMAPRESS.com

The most team-friendly contract in baseball belongs to Evan Longoria, signed just six days after his major league debut in April 2008. The Rays recognized that the earlier a team tries to lock up a young player, the more leverage they have in negotiations, attributing both to the uncertainty of his career path and his earning potential with restrictions of the reserve system. They played to that logic with Moore: When the Rays dangled a guaranteed $17.5 million in front of a 22-year-old kid fresh off the bus from Triple-A, he snapped at it. They now have control of the budding superstar until he's 30 -- three years past his free agency -- for a maximum single-season salary of just $14 million.

Of course, such a move only makes sense with an elite prospect, but that's precisely what Moore is to the Rays. They've handled his contract almost identically to Longoria's, as they offered him a guaranteed $14 million to lock him up at a maximum single-season salary of $11 million. It's a riskier bet on a pitcher than power-hitting third baseman, but the risk outweighs the reward, especially for a low-payroll team like Tampa.

Moore's deal includes five seasons with a guaranteed $1 million each through 2014, $3 million in 2015, and $5 million in 2016, followed by three club options which start at $7 million, $9 million, and $10 million, respectively, but can increase to $7.5 million, $9.75 million, and $11 million if Moore triggers certain starts or innings-pitched bonuses. The buyouts for the three options are $2.5 million, $1 million and $750,000. For Moore, the total value of the deal could be worth up to $39.25 million if the Rays pick up all three options and he hits all of each of his starts and innings totals. But if Moore pitches well enough for the Rays to consider doing so, the team would be more than happy to have paid less than $40 million for the first eight years of Moore's career, which works out to an average annual value south of $5 million.

It paid dividends with Longoria: They locked up the first nine years of his career for a maximum of $47.5 million, or roughly just $5.3 million per year.

 
SI.com
Hot Topics: NBA Playoffs NHL Playoffs Golden State Warriors Bryce Harper Paul Pierce Masai Ujiri
TM & © 2014 Time Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines, your California privacy rights, and ad choices.
SI CoverRead All ArticlesBuy Cover Reprint