CNN Time Free Email US Sports Baseball Pro Football College Football 1999 NBA Playoffs College Basketball Hockey Golf Tennis Soccer Motorsports Womens More Inside Game Scoreboards World
EVENTS
MLB Playoffs
Rugby World Cup
Century's Best
Swimsuit '99

CENTERS
 Fantasy Central
 Inside Game
 Multimedia Central
 Statitudes
 Your Turn
 Teams
 Cities

SPORTS ILLUSTRATED
 This Week's Issue
 Previous Issues
 Special Features
 Life of Reilly
 Frank Deford
 Subscriber Services
 SI for Women

  Power of Caring
  presented by Cigna


FEATURES
 Trivia Blitz
 Free Email

TELEVISION
 CNN/SI - TV
 Turner Sports

SHOPPING
 CNN/SI Travel
 Golf Pro Shop
 Soccer Gear Store
 NFL Gear Store

SI FOR KIDS
 Sports Parents
 Games
 Buzz World
 Shorter Reporter

SITE RESOURCES
 myCNN
 Contents
 Feedback
 Help
 Search
 Jobs
 
football Football Score and Recaps Schedules Standings Statistics Teams Matchups Players Arena CFL NFL Europe

Jets zoom ahead of Dolphins, Bucs

Send a question to Peter King Peter King's NFL Mailbag

Posted: Thu November 13, 1997

Glad everyone seems to be reading my Monday Morning Quarterback column. Judging by your e-mail, I need to defend something I wrote this week. I ranked the Jets among the NFL's Top 10 teams—at No. 10. Many people want to know why the Jets are on the list, while Tampa Bay and Miami are not.

When I rank teams I always ask myself, Would the higher-rated team beat the lower-rated team on a neutral field? I think, right now, on a neutral field, the Jets would beat Miami and Tampa. On the face of it, that's absurd because Miami has beaten the Jets twice this year and should therefore be viewed as the better team. However, I think if they played tomorrow on a neutral field the Jets would win. You're welcome to disagree. Come to think of it, you do.

Here's another thing that has everyone up in arms. In last week's Mailbag, I explained why I won't vote for Lynn Swann for the Hall of Fame. Several e-mails have suggested that I'm a New York homer for saying that Phil Simms belongs and Swann does not.

My main point is that Swann simply doesn't have the numbers, with 336 career catches, to merit induction, while Simms, who has decent career numbers, belongs. I don't think numbers ought to be a strict barometer for selection, but you have to at least look at them. Swann is 169th on the all-time receptions list. Simms is 15th all-time, with 33,462 passing yards.

I realize there's a good chance Simms will not make the Hall. But I still think the guy deserves to be in for many reasons, not the least of which is that he was very productive for a long time—much more productive than Swann.

How much of an effect do you think a new offensive coordinator has on a team? Since Chris Palmer took over in Jacksonville, the offense just hasn't clicked like it did the latter part of last season.
Robert Currey, Jacksonville

I'm going to Jacksonville this weekend so I'll have a better read after the Jags play Tennessee. But my preliminary thought is that Jacksonville has done remarkably well on offense for a team that has had to juggle QBs and offensive linemen. Hey, the Jags are second in the league in scoring. But they're 15th in third-down efficiency, 16th in passing yards per game and 20th in total yardage.

I think Chris Palmer was the best choice that coach Tom Coughlin could have made when Kevin Gilbride went to San Diego. Robert, the expectations in your town shot up dramatically after last January. I think 7-3 is a pretty good place to be for a team that last year at this time was 4-6.

What if the 49ers had kept Elvis Grbac and traded Steve Young to K.C. or another team for a good player? Then they wouldn't have needed to draft a QB in the first round. With Elvis and two more good players the Niners would be much better than with an old Steve Young.
Bob Bhakta, Los Angeles

GRBAC.jpg (23k) Interesting theory, but the salary cap would have made it almost impossible to trade Steve Young anywhere but to a team with a lot of cap room. Remember, Young is going to cost you $5 or $6 million on the cap and there aren't many teams that want to trade a borderline premier player for a 36-year-old quarterback who is going to cripple you financially.

Through 10 games Steve Young is the top-rated QB in the NFL. He has helped hold this team together in the wake of a horrible first-week injury to Jerry Rice. Say you're right, and we put Elvis and a pretty good Chiefs player on the San Francisco roster this year, I question whether the 49ers this year and next would be a better team.

Why aren't teams using their tight ends in the red zone as much as they used to?
Edward Ortiz, Hallowell, Maine

I have two theories:

    COATES.jpg (18k)

  1. Teams use the TE as a blocker more than they did three or four years ago. When the Cowboys bring in David LaFleur, their first-round pick this year, they're not bringing him in to make a clutch Novacek-type catch. They're bringing him in to block. I think the smallish, receiver-first tight ends are being phased out. With the exception of Pete Mitchell in Jacksonville and Shannon Sharpe in Denver, I don't see many small guys anymore.

  2. There just aren't many guys like New England's Ben Coates out there. It's possible that some are in the process of being grown—Atlanta's 267-pound O.J. Santiago comes to mind, as does 250-pound Rickey Dudley in Oakland—but they don't seem to be coming into the league the way they used to.

Do you see Elway, Marino and Moon all coming back next season as starters? Elway seems certain but the Dolphins and Seahawks have young QBs waiting to start.
Eric Rubenbauer, Lake Mills, Wis.

Actually, each one is a question mark for 1998. If Elway wins the Super Bowl, he might retire. I don't think the Seahawks will pencil in the 41-year-old Moon as the 1998 starter. Right now I think Jimmy Johnson will stick with Marino at the start of the year—but it depends on how Marino plays over the next six weeks and how he feels in the off-season. Watching him lately, I think Marino would be a lock to start next year unless he gets hurt.

Since it seems that Corey Dillon has established himself has the No. 1 back for the Bengals, do you think the Bengals should take the cap hit this year and release Ki-Jana Carter?
Jared Darlington, Lawrenceburg, Indiana

If the Bengals cut Carter today, his signing bonus would land on the 1998 cap, not this year's. Although Carter has been a disappointment to the Bengals, he's not the guy I would cut. I think cutting disappointing DE Dan Wilkinson right now would send a message that the team needs to hear. Namely, no one can get away with playing without passion.

Less a question than a thought: After a play in which a penalty is called and accepted, why isn't the time spent on that play put back on the clock? If the play didn't count, why should the time count?
Robert Keiper, Oak Harbor, Wash.

Excellent thought, Robert. If I were you, I would write a thoughtful letter to New York Giants GM George Young, the head of the NFL's competition committee, and suggest this. It makes perfect sense to me. Young's address: Giants Stadium, East Rutherford, N.J. 07073.

Does the Steelers' acquisition of Jerome Bettis from the Rams rank among your all-time greatest trades (or steals)?
David Koh, Lexington, Ky.

The Rams got rid of a guy who might be one of the most positive-thinking team players I've met. Recently coach Dick Vermeil told me the Rams have to stop running off their stars, and he brought up Bettis as an example.

It was a very good trade for the Steelers, but the Rams did draft TE Ernie Conwell with the second-round pick they got in return. Everyone in St. Louis loves Conwell, who has a chance to be one of the tight-end weapons I discussed a few questions north of here. If the Rams hadn't gotten a potentially very good player in return, this trade would have been an abomination.

Previous editions of Peter King's Mailbag

Send a question to Peter King



To the top

Copyright © 1999 CNN/SI. A Time Warner Company.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.