|
Letter from halftime Posted: Friday October 16, 1998 06:23 PM
Click here to send a question to Peter King. Dear Webpeople: Having a noisy time. Wish you were here. Since we call this a mailbag, I thought it might be apropos to write you a letter to top the column this week. So here I am, at halftime of Lions-Packers from the Silverdome press box, row 2, seat 38. Cute Lion blimp overhead. Sign him up. Swell marching band. Sign them up. And give the ball to Barry 73 times. I'm almost serious. Wouldn't it be fun to see Barry Sanders run every offensive play some game? It would have helped in this first half, when the Green Bay pass-rush was raining Packers on rookie quarterback Charlie Batch 's head. But I've got to hand it to the kid. He's got moxie and a self-assuredness about his play that I never saw with Scott Mitchell . Saw Packers GM Ron Wolf a few seats down from me before the game. He had the right attitude about the horrendous loss Green Bay suffered last Monday night to Minnesota at home. Forget about it. It was absurd. Brett Favre played the worst game of his life. (If you ask me, the acting game he played in There's Something About Mary was a little worse. Best line of that movie, by the way: Ben Stiller saying to Cameron Diaz , "Brett Favrvrvrvre?'') The one thing Wolf wished had happened at the trading deadline Tuesday, though, would have been for a cornerback to magically appear. Because I can see some frenetic January game, maybe even in Lambeau, ending with a shock when somebody like Steve Young or Troy Aikman throws a beautiful rainbow spiral over a cleanly beaten Craig Newsome , ending Green Bay's season. But looking at the Pack, it's clear they're not the dominant team they were in the last two seasons. And Favre's off. So how's everything out there with you guys? Is it just me, or has there been some snoozingly boring football so far this year. Saw rising-NFL-exec-star Bill Ford , the new Ford Motor chairman/Lions vice chairman, before the game, and he told me what I've been thinking, which is basically: Why have the games been snoozers so far? Why are there no games this Sunday I want to watch? Let's see. Arizona-New York Giants. Carolina-Tampa Bay. Cincinnati-Tennessee. Washington-Minnesota. Need I go on? I press on, then: Indy-San Francisco. Dallas-Chicago. Philly-San Diego. Wait, there's something. I'm dying to see Rodney Peete dump it off to Duce Staley seven times. So what do you think of the games so far? At the root of a lot of the boreball I think is some of the worst offensive line play I've ever seen. By far. I think the problem is that the big, athletic kids are being pushed in college toward the defensive side of the ball, and there's more quickness on the defensive front seven than ever before. I think Mike Shanahan has something cutting-edge going with the Broncos' smallish line. The tackles need to get smaller and quicker, not bigger and more plow-horsish. Quarterback play, though, is still the key to the games looking good. And the Lions might be on the right path with Batch, judging by his beautiful sleight-of-hand play-action fake and touchdown pass to Pete Chryplewicz midway through the second quarter. Well, the second half's almost here. Write back soon. Spirally yours, Peter King Now, on to this week's mailbag:
Peter, Don, Just one word for you: Underachievement. Actually, 34 more: Norv Turner deserves his wheelbarrow full of the blame. But as I said in my SI column last week about the stunningly lousy play of throw-the-blame-to-the-coach Dana Stubblefield , the fish stinks from the head.
As a Giants fan in England I get few chances to watch my team live and
did not see the Atlanta game which has to be their worst loss so far. Why
do so many players seem to be in a sophomore slumpTiki Barber, Danny Kanell, Roman Oben, and the like?
Are they playing worse, were they never that good or are opponents simply
preparing to play them that much better? Is this merely the price of
success?
I'll save you the trouble of getting a Giants-Falcons game tape. Just go to the video store and get one of those Nightmare on Elm Street things. There are about 8,790 Giants-related beefs in my mailbag, and this is my theory on them. There are three things wrong: 1. The overwhelming thing wrong is the play of the offensive line . New York coach Jim Fassel doesn't know what to do about these guys. They're a quiet, almost sleepy group without a leader and without anyone vocal to light a fire under them. Right now, no offensive line is worse in the NFL, and Danny Kanell is going to look abysmal as long as the line continues to play uninspired, leaky football. I'm beginning to think that the team brass vastly overrated these guys as players and is dumb to be talking about re-doing their contracts long-term. 2. They were plus-25 last year in turnover ratio . That will happen again in, oh, about 2072. 3. Their schedule last year was easy. This year it's hard.
Case closed.
With the dismal outing Elvis Grbac displayed
Sunday against the Patriots, how long will Marty Shottenheimer put up with
his play before turning to Rich Gannon?
I say play Grbac, but there's not much difference between the two. Playing one over the other isn't going to matter in January. One thing Grbac, who has missed 10 of 23 games with injuries since he signed with Kansas City, has to do is prove he can take big hits and come back and play big. He hasn't done that yet.
Does the acquisition of Darick Holmes mean that
the Packers feel that, contrary to what they are saying, they feel that Raymont Harris is not
going to be the runner they envisioned when they signed him? Will we
eventually see Travis
Jervey take over?
Harris leaves the Packers perplexed. He's been a major disappointment because he hasn't run consistently hard in games and the team doesn't know why. He runs hard in practice and doesn't limp, so they don't think he's still feeling the effects of his fractured leg last year. All of this is why they went out and got Darick Holmes from Buffalo, and I think with another week or so of practice you'll see Holmes spotted into the lineupor put in there more if Travis Jervey doesn't make the most of the chance the Packers are giving him to start.
Why won't Jim Fassel give Tyrone Wheatley a chance
to run the ball and prove himself? It is obvious that Tiki Barber is not an
every-down back. Maybe Wheatley will be able to produce if he gets upwards
of 15 carries a game.
Wheatley would be a good running back if he could run outside and make a few people miss, or if he could run over a people between the tackles. He can do neither. He runs neither hard nor with passion or strength. He is a living, breathing waste of a first-round pick. Other than that, Mrs. Clinton, how did you like the Presidency?
What is your gut feeling as to the quarterback situation for the Jets?
For now, Vinny Testaverde should play. Glenn Foley's recent ineptitude is surprising, considering how well he played in the preseason and at San Francisco in Week 1. The coaches have no other option but to conclude that he's been hugely affected by the torn rib cartilage suffered in Week 2. But knowing Testaverde's history, Foley's not in mothballs for the year.
Do you think Patriots tailback Robert Edwards has a
chance at rookie of the year based on his performance so far?
You mean AFC rookie of the year, I suppose. Because Randy Moss has the NFL offensive rookie of the year award in hand unless he tails off significantly. Robert Edwards would be the frontrunner for the AFC award, but it's so early. Jason Fabini might be the Jets' best offensive lineman right now and has filled a huge hole at right tackle. Fred Taylor could end up with huge numbers in Jacksonville's running game. Victor Riley has been a godsend for Kansas City's offensive line.
You mentioned that you thought that Dom Capers was one of 10 best head
coaches in NFL. Who is in your top 10?
I'll take this educated whack at a top 15:
1. Mike Shanahan, Denver.
Looking forward to the arguments that list stirs up. Click here to send a question to Peter King.
| |||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 1999 CNN/SI. A Time Warner Company. Terms under which this service is provided to you.
| |||||||||||||||||||