Shop Fantasy Central Golf Guide Email Travel Subscribe SI About Us  
  U.S. SPORTS
  scoreboards
baseball S
pro football S
col. football S
pro basketball S
m. college bb S
w. college bb S
hockey S
golf plus S
tennis S
soccer S
olympics 2000
motor sports
women's sports
more sports
 WORLD SPORT  

EVENTS
 Sportsman of the Year
 Heisman Trophy
 Swimsuit 2001

CENTERS
 Fantasy Central
 Inside Game
 Multimedia Central
 Statitudes
 Your Turn
 Message Boards
 Email Newsletters
 Golf Guide
 Cities
 Work in Sports

CNNSI.com GROUP
 Sports Illustrated
 Life of Reilly
 Television
 SI Women
 SI for Kids
 Press Room
 TBS/TNT Sports
 CNN Languages

COMMERCE
 SI Customer Service
 SI Media Kits
 Get into College
 Sports Memorabilia
 TeamStore

Scorecard

Click here for more on this story

Posted: Tuesday May 30, 2000 05:42 PM

No Ring, No Respect  

Does a player need a championship to certify his greatness?

By Greg Kelly

Sports Illustrated

According to Shakespeare, "Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them." Pity the modern athlete, then, who may have achieved greatness but had it taken from him.

Another NBA playoff run has left Karl Malone, Alonzo Mourning and John Stockton without a championship. Patrick Ewing may soon join them. The NHL postseason has spit out Ray Bourque. Now the media pundits and barroom sages will consign them all to that bleak corner -- over there with Barry Bonds and Tony Gwynn and Dan Marino -- reserved for players who have failed to win the Big One. The new logic dictates that all their achievements don't mean a thing if they ain't got that ring.

When did that become the law of the land? Was Ted Williams a loser because the sad-sack Red Sox never won a World Series with him? Wasn't it part of Ernie Banks's greatness that he loved the game so much he could hit 512 homers for a lousy outfit like the Cubs? Now we have the sorry spectacle of players like Roger Clemens jumping from team to team in search of a championship. Does anyone really think Clemens is somehow great only now, after winning a ring with the 1999 Yankees, a team that surely would have won without him? If anything, the rancorous way that Clemens left Boston and then Toronto, visions of rings dancing in his head, only detracted from his legacy.

If there's one person to blame for this front-running culture, it's Vince Lombardi, who promulgated the notion that winning isn't everything, it's the only thing. The results of that thinking have infected sports like a computer virus, the message worming its way through all levels of sport, even down to Little League. Along the way it destroyed something: the appreciation for great players.

Has there ever been a better power forward than Malone? Doubtful. Would the Heat have extended the Knicks to seven games in the conference semifinals if Mourning hadn't forced New York to double-team him? Not a chance. Is Bourque a lesser light, despite his 403 goals and five Norris Trophies, because he doesn't have his name inscribed on the Stanley Cup? Hardly. These are men who have achieved greatness, ring or no ring.

Issue date: June 5, 2000

For more Scorecard see this week's issue of Sports Illustrated, on newsstands Wednesday, May 31. Click here to subscribe to SI.

 
Related information
Stories
SI Online: Current Issue and Archives
Multimedia
Visit Multimedia Central for the latest audio and video
Search our site Watch CNN/SI 24 hours a day

Sports Illustrated and CNN have combined to form a 24 hour sports news and information channel. To receive CNN/SI at your home call your cable operator or DirecTV.


CNNSI Copyright © 2001
CNN/Sports Illustrated
An AOL Time Warner Company.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.