Shop Fantasy Central Golf Guide Email Travel Subscribe SI About Us Pro Football Fantasy More Football Leagues

 

EVENTS
 Sportsman of the Year
 Heisman Trophy
 Swimsuit 2001

CENTERS
 Fantasy Central
 Inside Game
 Video Plus
 Statitudes
 Your Turn
 Message Boards
 Email Newsletters
 Golf Guide
 Cities
 

CNNSI.com GROUP
 Sports Illustrated
 Life of Reilly
 SI Women
 SI for Kids
 Press Room
 TBS/TNT Sports
 CNN Languages

COMMERCE
 SI Customer Service
 SI Media Kits
 Get into College
 Sports Memorabilia
 TeamStore

Click here for more on this story
Posted: Tuesday November 13, 2001 4:02 PM
Updated: Tuesday November 13, 2001 5:02 PM

Sports Illustrated's Don Banks tackles three questions that matter to fans:
 1  Has Elvis Grbac provided the upgrade at quarterback that defending Super Bowl champion Baltimore sought in releasing  Trent Dilfer? 
  Elvis Grbac Elvis Grbac
Doug Pensinger/Allsport

Statistically the results in most cases are only marginally better. Yes, the Ravens under Grbac (4-3 in seven starts) and Randall Cunningham (2-0 in two) have had more a vertical threat in their offense then they ever did under Dilfer and Tony Banks in 2000. But let's play the comparison game through nine weeks and see how much of a difference the change at quarterback has made in the passing game.

Through nine games in 2000, the Ravens were 5-4 and had just played their record fifth consecutive touchdown-less game. They had scored 140 points, or 15.6 per game.

This year's Ravens are 6-3 through nine games. They have scored 157 points, or 17.4 per game. Better? Yes. Dramatically? Don't think so.

Through nine games of 2000, Baltimore had 10 offensive touchdowns, with eight coming via the passing game. This year, Baltimore's offense has 16 touchdowns so far, with 10 coming through the air.

Through nine games in 2000, the Ravens had 95 passing first downs and 56 on the ground. This year, they have 101 first downs via passing and 52 on the ground, a virtual wash.

Last year, Baltimore was averaging just 177.4 yards passing yards through nine games. This year, that number has risen significantly, to 217.2 yards per game, which ranks 11th overall in the NFL.

But nearly half of that 40-yard gain has been negated by Baltimore's decreased running game, which is largely attributable to Jamal Lewis' preseason knee injury and the team's continuing health problems on the right side of its offensive line. The Ravens were averaging 122.9 rushing yards and 300.3 total yards at this point last year. Through nine games this year, they're at 104.4 rushing and 321.7 total yards per game.

Has Grbac improved the Baltimore offense? Yes. Has there been enough improvement so far to warrant the risk of cutting Dilfer, the only Super Bowl-winning incumbent to ever be let go? That's a hard case to make.

With Dilfer and Banks, the Ravens won low-scoring games and played to their defense. With Grbac and Cunningham, the Ravens have won low-scoring games -- Baltimore's winning margin in its current three-game winning streak is a combined 10 points -- and played to their defense. Nothing new there.


 2  Was there some kind of jinx in finishing among the NFL's top 10 rusher leaders in 2000? 
  Edgerrin James Edgerrin James
M. David Leeds/Allsport

After considering the fate that has since befallen those talented 10, you decide.

The two-time reigning rushing leader, Indianapolis' Edgerrin James, is hurt and reportedly may be out for the season with 662 yards. Robert Smith, who led the NFC last year and was second behind James, surprisingly retired in February. Tennessee's Eddie George (444 yards) has been rendered mediocre by a series of injuries. Denver's Mike Anderson (465 yards) is miles behind his almost 1,500-yard rookie pace of last year.

And that's last season's top four.

Thanks to early injuries, Jacksonville's Fred Taylor and Baltimore's Lewis assuredly won't be in the top 10 again this year. Having missed two-plus games with an injury, Rams superback Marshall Faulk (544 yards) could miss out as well. After a sluggish start due to infrequent use, Washington's Stephen Davis is now coming on strong. His 666 rushing yards rank ninth, with a bullet.

Only two of last year's top 10 runners have shown little or no slippage. Cincinnati's Corey Dillon ranks eighth with 683 yards and is capable of ripping off a 200-yard day at almost any point. And Pittsburgh's beloved Bus, Jerome Bettis, with 866 yards, is well on his way to surpassing last year's total of 1,341.


 3  Amidst all the eye-popping rushing performances turned in around the league on Sunday, which one got most overlooked? 
  Antowain Smith Antowain Smith
Jamie Squire/Allsport

Two weeks after Buffalo had to stomach a painful last-second loss at the hands of Doug Flutie and the rest of the Bills-West bunch in San Diego, New England running back Antowain Smith ran for 100 yards and two touchdowns in the Patriots' 21-11 defeat of the Bills in Foxboro.

Yeah, that Antowain Smith, the formerly disgruntled Bills first-round pick who was released by Buffalo in May. Smith became only the latest ex-Bill to extract some revenge on his former team, and in the process helped further bury Buffalo (1-7) at the bottom of the AFC East.

Don't look now, but Smith, who gained 1,124 yards for the Bills in 1998 but quickly fell out of favor in Buffalo, has more rushing yards (574 to 544) and rushing touchdowns (six to five) than the Rams' Faulk. Not bad for a guy who was on the street this spring.

So what's next for Buffalo? Somebody signing Steve Christie and he ends up beating the Bills 24-23 on the strength of eight field goals? How about Thurman Thomas, Andre Reed and Bruce Smith suiting up together one last time and administering another history lesson on Buffalo's bedraggled bunch?



 
Related information
Multimedia
Visit Video Plus for the latest audio and video
Search our site Watch CNN/SI 24 hours a day
Sports Illustrated and CNN have combined to form a 24 hour sports news and information channel. To receive CNN/SI at your home call your cable operator or DirecTV.


CNNSI Copyright © 2001
CNN/Sports Illustrated
An AOL Time Warner Company.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.