|
Greene heads for Sacker's Paradise
Paul Zimmerman has been covering the NFL for Sports Illustrated since 1979. His exclusive online column appears each Thursday.
Posted: Thu August 28, 1997 Here's what I'd like to see this season: I'd like to see Kevin Greene get 11 or more sacks. It's a key number for him. It obsesses him. What's so special about 11 sacks? That would put him at 133 1/2, careerone ahead of Lawrence Taylor for lifetime sacks by a linebacker. Greene and I used to talk about it last year, when he was Carolina's left-side rushing linebacker. He made no bones about it: This is a record that haunts him because he wants it so much.
"Don't mess around with head injuries," I said to Greene. "Take a game off." "Can't afford to," he replied. "Got to keep those sacks up." Well, he ended up leading the league with 14 1/2 sacks. Then he got into that money thing with the Panthers, and now he's a 49er, playing that Elephant position, rushing from the weak side, the open side. Sacker's paradise. How do the Niners do it? They're always flirting with the upper reaches of the salary cap, yet they always get the guy they wantRod Woodson in July, Deion Sanders three years ago and now Greene. Everyone knows that his six-year, $13 million contract is a joke. Greene will be 41 six years from now; he'll never play it out. The point is, he'll only count $350,000 against the cap this season. (Please don't ask me to explain the intricacies of this number juggling. I flunked economics in school.) Very few teams will pay an aging superstar for what he's done in the past. A lot of older stars, such as Buffalo's Bruce Smith, have trouble understanding this. But these days, the money goes to guys on the way upjust look at the packages unproven draft choices are getting. But the Niners are the exception to the rule. They see a guy they want, a player someone else can't afford, and they grab him. Then their economists go to work looking for ways around the salary cap. Well, good for Greene. He's been a great player. He deserves whatever he can get. And I hope he gets his sacks.
HERE'S ANOTHER THING I'd like to see in '97: I'd like to see all those coaches who keep talking about "establishing the run" actually do it. That's all I hear during the weekWe have got to establish the run. Then comes Sunday, and the first time they're in second-and-six, here come the wideouts. Yes, they'll do some finesse running out of the multiple-wideout sets, but that really doesn't establish much. First-and-10, run the ball. Second-and-six, run it again. Third-and-three, run it one more time. That's called committing yourself to the running game. Most coaches now consider third-and-three a passing down.
Take the Jets, for example. Bill Parcells back-burnered offensive coordinator Ron Erhardt, one of the NFL's best coaches of the running game. Erhardt was replaced by Charlie Weis, who brings along a wide-open attack that will feature multiple receivers. And Jim Fassel, a passing-game coach his whole career, has replaced the Giants' thumping attack. He'll rely on skill people like Tiki Barber, a small running back, and Ike Hilliard, a big-play wideout. The running game in the NFL has been in decline ever since offensive linemen started weighing 330. "It's hard for them to get down low and really use proper drive-block techniques," former Niner coach Bill Walsh says. "It's mostly straight-ahead zone blocking today. The runner just finds a crease. "The intricate timing of the old running game is lost. I'm convinced that linemen can function better without those gigantic bellies hanging over their pants, but everyone glorifies that now." During the preseason, Sports Illustrated asked coaches the following question: What's the best way to defeat the zone blitz? Almost everyone said: Run the ball at it. I'm waiting. Previous editions of Dr. Z | |||||
Copyright © 1999 CNN/SI. A Time Warner Company. Terms under which this service is provided to you.
|