|
Can't anybody around here run?
Paul Zimmerman has covered the NFL for Sports Illustrated since 1979. His exclusive online column appears each Friday.
Posted: Fri September 26, 1997 Terrell Davis' 50-yard touchdown run last Sunday broke the Broncos-Bengals game apart in the fourth quarter and sent him on the way to his career 215-yard day. I wanted to see what really happened on the play so I ran the tape back a few times. This is what I saw:
For some strange reason, Reinard Wilson, the Bengals' 1997 No. 1 draft pick, normally a rush linebacker, plays right defensive tackle in this alignment. On this play he did a wide looping stunt to his left, leaving a gaping hole which I assume should have been filled in some manner by the left defensive tackle, 313-pound Dan (Big Daddy) Wilkinson. But Wilkinson had worries of his own. Tom Nalen, a very tenacious 286-pound center, had latched onto Wilkinson in what was supposed to be a double-team block. But Nalen didn't need any help: He nullified Big Daddy by himself. But what made things even worse for Cincinnati was the fact that Wilson and Copeland were so far out of the play that they fouled up the second stratum of defense, the nickel back and strong safety. At that point the only person left to deal with Davis was free safety Greg Myers. About the only thing Myers could do was to dive atand missDavis.
I ran this thing again and again, and I still couldn't believe what I had seen. This was the famous zone blitz that Dick LeBeau had come over from Pittsburgh to install? So unsound, so cockamamie. Our high school coach, former Giants guard Charley Avedisian, would have smacked us in the head if we used technique like the Bengals did. Even in a base defense situation (second-and-four) later in the quarter, I saw defenders rushing themselves out of position. This allowed Davis to break a 34-yarder to set up the field goal that put the game away. So, I have to ask, where are the running attacks to punish this kind of defense? Pound it, bury it, grind it into submission. Throw just enough to keep people from loading up. The problem is that the old drive-blocking skill is almost a lost art. Offensive linemen have gotten too big. They have trouble getting down low and rooting people out, as we were taught in the old days, before the telephone and the automobile. The running game today? is what one old line coach used to call "mushing," or what Frank Kush termed "belly-bumping." But even that can be effective at times, if you've got an Emmitt Smith or a Barry Sanders tucking in behind those monsters. Still, I feel that a more streamlined, athletic linepulling, trapping, drive-blockingwould be even better. Why do offensive tackles have to be so big? They're blocking 275- to 280-pound defensive ends on base downs and usually sleek rush specialists in passing situations. The thinking, I guess, is that you have to build a wall in front of the quarterback with the biggest slabs of concrete you can find. The Broncos have a small offensive line, with four of the five guys under 300 pounds. It's the best in the business. Their linemen get after people and ride them in the direction they're going, and Davis cuts back and finds the creases. The Redskins run well behind bigger guys, but Norv Turner, along with the Oilers' Jeff Fisher, is one of the few coaches devoted to the ground game. Washington runs the lead play with a guard or second tight end pulling, and Terry Allen hugs the guy's shoulder and then makes his break. Very effective. Tennessee has the smallest center in the business, the agile, 269-pound Mark Stepnoski, who sets up the traps and counters that help get Eddie George get all that yardage. Pittsburgh, another good running team, does likewise with its Pro Bowl player in the middle, Dermontti Dawson. So you see, here and there you can find teams that at least try to get some sort of a running game going. I just wish there were more of them. O.K., enough of this Johnny-one-note. I guess you've figured out by now that I love the running game. However, even I'm not blind enough to ignore the fact that you must have a high level pass-catch operation as well. Otherwise, defenses will just cram eight men into the box and stuff your ground attack cold, as San Francisco did to Atlanta last weekend. But still, if you run the ball well, and teach it in camp, and draft the people to make it go, as Bill Parcells once did before he drafted Drew Bledsoe, you've got a real edge. Which brings us to this week's action, and forgive me, please, if I don't confine my handicapping strictly to which team runs better. Too many other variables, naturally. The Giants to kill New Orleans, which doesn't figure, since the Saints are coming off the Mike Ditka Memorial Victory and New York is still struggling to find an offense. The Giants will win it with defense, and the defense Dave Brown and the boys will face is nothing like the St. Louis outfit that punished them so severely last week. Late Sunday night I had predicted a Bengals home victory over the Jets. That was before I saw the tape of Cincinnati-Denver. Yes, I'm switching. Adrian Murrell will run for 100-plus as New York springs an upset. Washington over Jacksonville, my preseason AFC Super Bowl pick. This is assuming that Gus Frerotte has gotten things straightened out over the bye week. Granted, Mark Brunell was magnificent Monday night, but I was surprised at the Jaguars' inability to run the ball. Just another case of an offensive line that's simply too big and too immobile. Philly to upset Minnesota in the dome. Eagles offensive coordinator Jon Gruden will have a lot of fun with the vacated zone defense that gave Brett Favre five touchdowns last week. Finally San Francisco, riding the revenge theme, to beat the Panthers in Carolina, butand it's a big butI'm not sure Steve Young will make it through this one. That sounds heartless, I know, but Vic Fangio's whole defensive scheme will be to attack the tackles, as the Bucs, the Rams, the Saints and the Falcons all did with great success. Previous editions of Dr. Z | ||||||
Copyright © 1999 CNN/SI. A Time Warner Company. Terms under which this service is provided to you.
|