|
Players of the weak?
Paul Zimmerman has covered the NFL for Sports Illustrated since 1979. His exclusive online column appears each Friday.
Posted: Fri October 24, 1997 You never know where they're going to appear. They come creeping out like lost puppies. I'm talking about the NFL awards: offensive, defensive and special teams players of the week. These should be fairly meaningful things. I mean, someday Mike Pagel, the old Colts quarterback, can say that he was the AFC's offensive player of the week back in 1984, on the second week of the award's existence. But where do you find these things? The AP moves them, and then they might appear at the bottom of some beat writer's notes column or in agate type somewhere if the news desk isn't too overloaded that night.
MVP of the Super Bowl is bad, too. I mean Larry Brown got it for the Cowboys-Steelers contest in '96 because two interceptions fell right into his hands. And O.J. Anderson got it for the '91 Bills-Giants Super Bowl, even though Thurman Thomas's numbersand performanceburied O.J.'s. And when I screamed in the press box, "Just look at the stats!" (yes, I was a selector then), guys told me, in their ignorance, "You're not allowed to pick a guy on a losing team." Oh, brother. But we're talking about the weekly awards now, and I always wondered just how they're selected. So last week I called Greg Aiello, the NFL's p.r. guy, and he laid it out for me. It's done by a committee of half a dozen or so league people, publicity guys mostly. They study the weekly stats. They solicit nominations from p.r. directors. "Some of the club guys are fairly diligent," Aiello said. "Some of them can't be bothered." So who are the good ones and who are the stiffs? Well, the league couldn't get into that, so I called a guy, Mr. Anonymous, who used to be part of the procedure but no longer is and would not care to be mentioned by name. "Off the top of my head, I'd say San Francisco, Dallas, Green Bay, Kansas City and the Giants were pretty much on the ball," he said. "Oakland, of course, was hopeless, and in all the years I worked in the league office I never got a call from Chicago. "You can't believe the politicking that went on in the weekly sessions. You tended to lean toward the good-citizen types. Sometimes you wanted to reward certain clubs." Oh sure, I can believe it. In Week 1 against the 49ers, Tampa Bay's Warren Sapp had one of the greatest games I've ever seen a defensive tackle have. Sapp got credit for nine unassisted tackles, two assists and 2 1/2 sacks, which should count as tacklesI mean you wrap up a guy and he falls down, right? Did he get the award? He did not. The NFC's defensive player that week was Detroit middle linebacker Stephen Boyd, whose numbers read six unassisted tackles, seven assists (hometown scorers always hand these out liberally to their favorites) and an interception.
The next week Sapp dislocated a finger and sprained both ankles, and was basically ineffective for the month of September. But his misdemeanor charge got dismissed, and guess what? The NFL chose him as its defensive player of the month. Are you getting my thinking on these awards? I pick my own player of the game for each game I see. Often it's an offensive lineman. Do you know how many offensive linemen have been chosen NFC or AFC offensive player of the week?(In the 14 years the awards have been given, they've honored almost 500 offensive players.) Ready? Three. Dallas's Erik Williams in '92, Washington's Jim Lachey in '90 and the Giants' Brad Benson in '86all tackles, incidentally. Hey, fellas, guards and centers occasionally play well, too. Oh yes, the Chicago Bears' "offensive line" won the award one week in 1990, ignoring the fact that not every player performs at the same level. But these pickers don't come into the room and say, "This is who I saw play well." It's all done with numbers and stats and tackles and assists charts, and that's my biggest complaint. One year, when New England's superlative guard John Hannah was coming up for Hall of Fame selection, a guy on the committee said, "Well, I talked to so and so [naming two defensive players], and they said he was good, not great." And I said, "How do you think he played?" And this guy, who had the power to significantly affect a person's life, said, "How the hell do I know what offensive linemen do out there?" At that point I got incoherent, as I'm on the verge of getting now just recalling it, and, since my wife is giving me strange looks and is reminding me, "You're talking to yourself again," I will retreat into a more sensible realm, i.e., the upcoming contests.
New England beats the Pack in the Monday-nighter. The key is how functional Green Bay's defensive monster in the middle, Gilbert Brown, will be, coming off a bad knee. This is a guy who is all-world in the first quarter, comes off the field in the nickel rush and then is sucking wind in the fourth period. But he's still effective when people try to run at him, and when he was out of the lineup, the Packers were very soft against the ground attack. The Patriots will run enough to give Drew Bledsoe a cushion. They made a mistake last week in getting away from their regular bump coverage and going zone against the Jets' Glenn Foley. The kid simply devoured them. They won't make that mistake against the Pack. Atlanta to upset Carolina on the road, if, and it's a big if, Chris Chandler is functional. This is a team that loses but beats people upfour 49ers offensive linemen had to leave the game last weekand I think the O-line is the most disappointing part of the Panthers' operation. The Eagles to beat Dallas, this time in Philly. I picked them in an upset in the last one and almost called it. You think I'm going to abandon them now? Tampa Bay over Minnesota, but two things have to happenpass rush on Brad Johnson, keep the rush off Trent Dilfer. I like the Bucs to go for 150-plus on the ground. Jacksonville-Pittsburgh is an intriguing one, and I'm tempted to go for the upset here, after the Jaguars took Dallas down to the wire in what should have been a look-ahead week for them, but they just don't seem to play well in Three Rivers, and ... no, I'm going to pick the upset. Quarterback vs. quarterback, and if it comes down to the fourth quarter, I like Mark Brunell over Kordell Stewart. Seattle over the rampaging Raiders. If I know my Oakland team, they'll be celebrating that Denver win into December. Arizona over Tennessee as Chapter One is written in the Saga of Jake the Snake. And finally, Washington to bounce back hard against Baltimore, which always starts off running well but somehow loses its momentum. Previous editions of Dr. Z | ||||||
Copyright © 1999 CNN/SI. A Time Warner Company. Terms under which this service is provided to you.
|