|
Disbelief in Small-Town America Why Did the Vikings Sit on the Ball?Posted: Thursday January 21, 1999 02:56 PM
Click here to send your NFL and Super Bowl questions and comments to Peter King. APPLETON, Wis. -- In this all-American town for the midwest's biggest sports banquet of the year, I chuckled at Vikings fan Paul Molitor 's remarks about Atlanta's win over Minnesota Sunday at the Metrodome. Minnesotan Molitor was clearly still feeling some heartbreak. "My throat's still a little bit red," Molitor told 1,700 banqueteers. (Is there such a word?) "Residual side effect of that choking on Sunday." Molitor was just kidding, I think. It was the kind of line you think up for the rubber-chicken circuit. The Packer nuts in the house loved it, of course. But all references to choking aside, I still can't figure it out, and neither can all of Appleton from what I heard. Everybody who talked about that game with me asked the same thing: Why'd the most prolific offense in NFL history -- with the score tied at 27, with a third-and-three at their own 30, with two timeouts left and 30 seconds to play -- sit on a tie and play for overtime? I've got to say that it was one of the worst coaching decisions I've ever seen. Minnesota coach Dennis Green did a great job this year, but if he doesn't wake up and stare at the ceiling in the next few days and say out loud: "Boy, I screwed that one up," then he's not being honest with himself. It would be one thing if the Vikings had been at some risk by attacking at that point. But the Falcons were out of timeouts. Minnesota could have thrown a short one for the first down and called time with 24 seconds left. Then they would have had three sideline plays -- or two sideline throws and one in-bounds to get the 30 yards necessary to get Gary Anderson into field-goal position so that he could redeem himself. Incredible. You're the best offense in the world. You're on the home carpet. You have Randy Moss. You have the crowd. And you sit on it, hoping to win a coin flip in overtime. And in 26 percent of all overtime games played in NFL history, the team that won the toss scored on the first possession and the team that lost the toss never got a sniff at the ball. This is strategy? I'm incredulous, as is Appleton. Now for your questions:
In your Monday Morning QB, you said you are already sick of
Reeves-Elway stories. Okay, what are the less apparent/more compelling
story lines we should be looking out for over the next two weeks? The two I like:
This is more of a comment and observation: I look forward to reading
your MMQB column every week, but for you to give the Falcons a courtesy
mention in your column, yet spew the accolades on a Denver team that was
expected to win their game with Offensive AND Defensive Player of the Week
honors, well....it rings of "Terrell, please be my friend." Chris
Chandler had to put up with the loudest NFL stadium there is, and not only
did the Falcons not false start or use any timeouts because of the noise,
he drew the Vikings offside four times. Oh, yeah, he also threw for 340
yards, three touchdowns and NO interceptions in an incredibly hostile
environment. Sounds like a performance of a lifetime, but hey, Terrell Davis broke a 100
yards and you think his Chunky Soup commercial is a hoot. GIVE THE FALCONS
THEIR DUE, MMQB!!!!!!! Why do I think if you weren't a Falcons fan you wouldn't have cared who the MMQB players of the week were? I agree with you that Chandler was spectacular Sunday, against all odds. He's proven to me and to America that he's a big-timer, and the Falcons would have lost that game without him, as sure as we're arguing here. My thought process, simply, was this: The Jets are pretty good. Elway was a lost sheep for 90 percent of Sunday's game. Terrell Davis has now rushed for 199 and 167 yards in the two playoff games, the second of which they'd have lost by two scores without him, in my opinion. He now has as many 100-yard rushing games in playoff history as any back who's ever played. Your argument for Chandler is a loyal and valid one. I just liked Davis' performance better Sunday.
What are your thoughts about combined coach/general manager positions,
given that so many new hires are looking to do both and yet many recently
fired coaches were axed because of their bad personnel decisions?
Look at the NFL Final Four this year. Dan Reeves coaches and acts as general manager, for all intents and purposes. Bill Parcells and Mike Shanahan do, too. And Dennis Green is the master of his domain, even though technically he's not making every decision. This is a cyclical issue. A few years ago, owners frothed over Ron Wolf and Bobby Beathard , and the tide will turn again when the new crop of maturing GM-types start drafting winners.
What's the latest on the Bears' coaching situation? It could be decided by the time you read this. I hear Mike McCaskey really likes Sherm Lewis , the Packers offensive coordinator. I think it'll come down to Lewis, Arizona defensive coordinator Dave McGinnis or Buffalo offensive coordinator Joe Pendry .
Looking to next year, will the Broncos start Bubby Brister or Brian Griese at
quarterback? I asked Mike Shanahan that very same question the other day in Denver. He told me that Bubby will be his man, but that Griese would get time during the year. One thing's for sure: Shanahan's not looking for a quarterback this offseason.
Why do you think Ron Wolf hired a defensive coach in Ray Rhodes instead
of an offensive-minded one like Brian Billick ? One of the most underrated things about coaching (and it keeps rearing its head in places like New England, Baltimore and Washington) is that players must have some fear of the man who coaches them. The players must feel, in some way, that the head coach will fire them if they screw up too often, and that the head coach will stop at nothing to win games. And when Wolf went looking for a coach, he thought that element was very important. If Brett Favre gets out of line and needs some verbal slapping, Wolf knows Rhodes is up for the job. I think he was the best man for the Packers. And at this banquet in Appleton, I was impressed to hear Rhodes soothe the masses thusly: "I assure everyone that I will not tinker with what's not broke." But, he told me before the dinner, he will tinker with what needs tinkering. He knows he needs corner help, and more consistent play from the two lines, and some healthy receivers.
Will New Orleans look to sign Kerry Collins during the
offseason, or go quarterback shopping? Collins likes Mike Ditka and could end up back in New Orleans. But I think he'll play the field and see if anyone gives him a better deal. It'll be interesting to see if any other team gives him the chance to come to camp with a promise to compete for the starting job. I mean real competition. I don't think he's earned the luxury of getting a job handed to him. And remember, if he stays in New Orleans, he's got Billy Joe Tolliver and Billy Joe Hobert to beat out, and both have turned over new leaves from their formerly wild days. On a level field I'm not sure that Collins can beat them out.
Which players were you surprised were left unprotected for the
expansion draft? Two guys: Chicago tackle Andy Heck, who two years ago surrendered zero sacks, and New England guard Todd Rucci, a solid NFL starter. Most of the rest is flotsam.
Who are the jewels of the expansion draft?
Who are the most underrated players in the Browns' expansion draft?
I will answer these in tandem, with a top 10 list of candidates after speaking with a couple of pro personnel men in the league last week:
What are the Chiefs looking for in their next head coach? I talked to Kansas City president and GM Carl Peterson the other night, and it sounded like toughness was high on his agenda. "I need a guy, quite frankly, to get these guys' attention," said Peterson. "We didn't have the control of this team that we've had in the past." My gut tells me if Dom Capers can prove to Peterson he's got a tough edge, he'll be the choice. If not, it'll be current Chiefs defensive coordinator Gunther Cunningham .
What is your opinion on Jimmy Johnson's resignation and return? It's legit. Johnson told me after his mother's funeral that he was melancholy -- I never knew that word was in his dictionary -- and I got the impression he was questioning how much he'd ignored his family over the years. I talked to one of his best friends the night this all came down, and the guy said: "It's legit. Jimmy's had it." And as I wrote in Scorecard of Sports Illustrated this week, Wayne Huizenga and Dan Marino quasi-nagged it out of him the next morning.
What exactly is Dave Wannstedt's role with the Dolphins? He's not the
offensive coordinator, he's not the defensive coordinator? What's the deal?
I don't think anyone knows yet. Wannstedt will take on some of the tasks that Jimmy is tired of doing, like scouting at the Senior Bowl this week. Johnson will groom him to be his successor, whatever that involves.
Has Warren Moon
retired? If not, which team will he play for in 1999? What's his status in
Mike Holmgren's book? Moon wants to play one more year, and he'll meet with Mike Holmgren in the next few days to determine his status with the team. I think he'll have to take a salary hit to stay with the Seahawks, and he'll balk, so he'll have to find another home. My guess is San Diego, where Ryan Leaf still badly needs a mentor.
Loved your review of Life is Beautiful, and I went to go see it
on your recommendation. You were right. It was great. I love Peter King,
Movie Reviewer. What's your early favorite for Best Picture, and to make
this question just a little bit football related, what do you think is the
best football movie ever? Pictures of the Year:
I think North Dallas Forty is the alltime best football movie, but it's a very, very weak crop. Best sports movie ever: Hoosiers, followed closely by Bang The Drum Slowly. See you at the Super Bowl. Click here to send your NFL and Super Bowl questions and comments to Peter King.
| |||||||||||||
Copyright © 1999 CNN/SI. A Time Warner Company. Terms under which this service is provided to you.
| |||||||||||||