Shop Fantasy Central Golf Guide Email Travel Subscribe SI About Us NFL Football Fantasy More Football Leagues

 
  U.S. SPORTS
  pro football
scores
schedules
standings
stats
matchups
stadiums
depth charts
injuries
transactions
players
teams
scoreboards
baseball S
col. football S
pro basketball S
m. college bb S
w. college bb S
hockey S
golf plus S
tennis S
soccer S
motor sports
olympic sports
women's sports
more sports
 WORLD SPORT

EVENTS
 Sportsman of the Year
 Heisman Trophy
 Swimsuit 2001

CENTERS
 Fantasy Central
 Inside Game
 Multimedia Central
 Statitudes
 Your Turn
 Message Boards
 Email Newsletters
 Golf Guide
 Cities
 Work in Sports

CNNSI.com GROUP
 Sports Illustrated
 Life of Reilly
 Television
 SI Women
 SI for Kids
 Press Room
 TBS/TNT Sports
 CNN Languages

COMMERCE
 SI Customer Service
 SI Media Kits
 Get into College
 Sports Memorabilia
 TeamStore

Moore designation

NFL players union files greivance against Cardinals

Click here for more on this story

Posted: Tuesday January 25, 2000 03:45 PM

  Rob Moore At issue is whether Rob Moore signed a one-year deal while nearing completion on a separate long-term contract. Andy Lyons/Allsport

MESA, Ariz. (AP) -- The NFL Players Association filed a grievance against the Arizona Cardinals, saying the team improperly called Rob Moore its franchise player.

The union claims the Cardinals violated the collective-bargaining agreement last year by negotiating a deal with Moore that was designed to ensure the franchise player tag could be used on a different player this year.

The union says Arizona should lose its right to apply the tag to another player for the four-year duration of Moore's contract, a move that could keep the Cardinals from designating star defensive end Simeon Rice as its franchise player this year.

At issue in the grievance, filed two weeks ago, is whether Arizona came to a one-year agreement with Moore while a long-term deal already was completed or near completion, simply to retain the franchise tag.

By announcing a one-year agreement with Moore 12 days before a multiyear deal was signed, Arizona thought it had retained the right to use its franchise tag on another player for the upcoming season.

Had the four-year deal been announced originally, the Cardinals would have lost the franchise tag for the duration of that contract.

Each team designates one "franchise player," meaning it must pay him among the top five at his position, can match any offer from another team and get two first-round draft picks if it doesn't match.

Three other NFL teams also are being questioned about their handling of the franchise tag: Green Bay (running back Dorsey Levens); San Francisco (wide receiver J.J. Stokes) and Cincinnati (wide receiver Carl Pickens).

Moore's agent Gary Wichard said the team and Moore did not have a finalized multiyear deal when the one-year deal was signed.

"We signed the one-year because Rob wanted to play the first game with the idea we'd continue to negotiate," he said.


 
Related information
Stories
Chiefs' Thomas paralyzed from waist down
Redskins hire Rhodes, Fazio as assistants
Belichick seeks restraining order against NFL
CNNSI.com's Complete Super Bowl Coverage
Multimedia
Visit Multimedia Central for the latest audio and video
Search our site Watch CNN/SI 24 hours a day

Sports Illustrated and CNN have combined to form a 24 hour sports news and information channel. To receive CNN/SI at your home call your cable operator or DirecTV.

Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


CNNSI Copyright © 2000
CNN/Sports Illustrated
An AOL Time Warner Company.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.