Shop Fantasy Central Golf Guide Email Travel Subscribe SI About Us NFL Football Fantasy More Football Leagues

 
  U.S. SPORTS
  pro football
scores
schedules
standings
stats
matchups
stadiums
depth charts
injuries
transactions
players
teams
scoreboards
baseball S
col. football S
pro basketball S
m. college bb S
w. college bb S
hockey S
golf plus S
tennis S
soccer S
motor sports
olympic sports
women's sports
more sports
 WORLD SPORT

EVENTS
 Sportsman of the Year
 Heisman Trophy
 Swimsuit 2001

CENTERS
 Fantasy Central
 Inside Game
 Video Plus
 Statitudes
 Your Turn
 Message Boards
 Email Newsletters
 Golf Guide
 Cities
 

CNNSI.com GROUP
 Sports Illustrated
 Life of Reilly
 SI Women
 SI for Kids
 Press Room
 TBS/TNT Sports
 CNN Languages

COMMERCE
 SI Customer Service
 SI Media Kits
 Get into College
 Sports Memorabilia
 TeamStore

Judge gets new note from jury

Click here for more on this story
Posted: Friday May 18, 2001 2:54 PM
Updated: Friday May 18, 2001 9:42 PM
 

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- The jury in the Raiders-NFL trial sent the judge a new note Friday, a day after the panel sent a message saying it was deadlocked on two issues in the team's $1.2 billion lawsuit against the league.

The latest note contained two questions about evidence involving a new stadium proposed in 1995 at Hollywood Park in Inglewood.

The Raiders, who had been playing at historic Memorial Coliseum, contend the NFL forced the team to abandon plans to build the stadium by pushing for a second team to play there. The Raiders also say they own the rights to the Los Angeles market.

The league denies both claims.

The note sent Friday to Superior Court Judge Richard C. Hubbell was shown only to lawyers on both sides without the judge or jury in the courtroom. The attorneys submitted written replies to Hubbell, who considered them in replying to the jury's question.

The jury later recessed for the weekend as scheduled.

The jury sent its first note Thursday informing the judge that they had deadlocked on two issues. Hubbell responded by directing the jury to keep deliberating.

The panel first began deliberations on April 30, then had to begin again on May 4 after the jury foreman was excused to take a long-planned vacation. He was replaced by an alternate.

Both sides in the lawsuit were reluctant to interpret the developments.

"From time to time juries need to ask questions if something is important and needs to be cleared up," said Joe Alioto, lead attorney for the Raiders.

NFL spokesman Joe Browne said it appeared the jury was working to "make a decision based on logic and fact rather than emotions."

The Raiders, who moved from Oakland to Los Angeles in 1982, returned to Oakland before the 1995 season.


 
Related information
Stories
Raiders lawsuit trial jury appears deadlocked on two issues
Multimedia
Visit Multimedia Central for the latest audio and video
Search our site Watch CNN/SI 24 hours a day
Sports Illustrated and CNN have combined to form a 24 hour sports news and information channel. To receive CNN/SI at your home call your cable operator or DirecTV.

Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


CNNSI Copyright © 2001
CNN/Sports Illustrated
An AOL Time Warner Company.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.