Shop Fantasy Central Golf Guide Email Travel Subscribe SI About Us Hockey Almanac Fantasy Minors College Juniors

 
  U.S. SPORTS
  hockey
scores
schedules
standings
stats
matchups
injuries
transactions
players
teams
scoreboards
baseball S
pro football S
col. football S
pro basketball S
m. college bb S
w. college bb S
golf plus S
tennis S
soccer S
motor sports
olympic sports
women's sports
more sports
 WORLD SPORT

EVENTS
 Sportsman of the Year
 Heisman Trophy
 Swimsuit 2001

CENTERS
 Fantasy Central
 Inside Game
 Video Plus
 Statitudes
 Your Turn
 Message Boards
 Email Newsletters
 Golf Guide
 Cities
 

CNNSI.com GROUP
 Sports Illustrated
 Life of Reilly
 SI Women
 SI for Kids
 Press Room
 TBS/TNT Sports
 CNN Languages

COMMERCE
 SI Customer Service
 SI Media Kits
 Get into College
 Sports Memorabilia
 TeamStore

Lindros return not a sure thing

Click here for more on this story
Posted: Wednesday December 06, 2000 4:03 PM

 

Click here to send an NHL question to Kostya Kennedy.

Hey, folks. Everyone's talkin' Lindros, so why not us?

And on another (musical) note, anyone who hasn't heard the anthem performed before a Canadiens game lately, should get his or her ears up to Montreal. They're the best anthem renditions in the league.

Now, on to the 'bag ...

As a former Toronto resident and a rabid Leafs fan, I'm more than a little concerned about all this Lindros in Toronto talk. Granted, a healthy Lindros is one of the most intimidating players and itinerate scorers in the NHL, but I question whether all of the baggage he brings with him (i.e. bigger-than-the-team attitude, apparently insane family) isn't more of a liability than his talent is an asset. So my question is twofold: Do you think he'll end up in a Leafs uniform, and would this be a good move for a rapidly improving Toronto team?
—Allan Gray, Cape Town, South Africa

I don't think Lindros is going to play again in the NHL, for anyone.

But if I'm wrong, the Leafs are one of a few teams (Rangers, Kings, Lightning) that could try to snare him. Pat Quinn has maintained that he won't trade any of his top nine players for Lindros, so the Leafs would have to put together a creative package to land him.

Yes, Lindros has overbearing parents and they can be a detriment. But the Big E's own star complex isn't as bad as it's made out to be -- a lot of that comes from his folks. The most relevant baggage he carries is his susceptibility to concussions. How long before he takes the hit that ends his career? Lindros is a huge gamble. The Leafs (or any team) would have to be very careful to minimize whatever risk they take to get him.

Legally, does Eric Lindros or any team interested in him have any recourse if Bobby Clarke refuses a reasonable trade offer? In general, can an arbitrator step in and determine the "trade-worthiness" of a player? If not, shouldn't someone be able to in order to prevent a player from being effectively barred from "pursuing his trade? Personally, I'd like to see Lindros play in Europe for a year and see how his body holds up. It would also be good practice for the Olympics, provided Gretzky & Co. select him.
—Caitlin, Ann Arbor, Mich.

Have I mentioned that I don't believe Eric Lindros is going to play again in the NHL ... ?

In any event, Lindros would have no prescribed course of action. He would have to take unprecedented legal action and an arbitrator would have to rule this a unique situation in order to step in. (Of course, Lindros has had his fate decided by arbitration before.) I doubt that will happen, though -- Lindros would retire before it comes to that.

There is exactly zero chance that Lindros will spend a year playing in Europe.

With the Red Wings' age obviously catching up with them, the newly brewing goaltender controversy and the gap between the top teams in the West widening, do you see GM Ken Holland making a big move or two to strengthen the Wings' defense in the near future?
—Chad Matthews, Harper Woods, Mich.

Holland will almost certainly make a trade to improve the defense, though he probably won't do it until closer to the trade deadline. The Wings are quite actively scouting NHL players. Detroit has essentially been trying to repair its defense ever since Vladimir Konstantinov's career ended in a car accident after the Stanley Cup Finals in 1997. Yes, they won again without him, but the defense has never been the same.

Detroit is not as far from the top as you suggest. The Red Wings have played very well and had remarkable success given their vulnerability on defense. If they can make that key move for a defenseman and improve their goaltending (neither of those will be easy to do but are certainly possible) they could win two playoff rounds in the spring.

Since Anaheim president/GM Pierre Gauthier has announced publicly that he won't fire Craig Hartsburg and won't trade Paul Kariya or Teemu Selanne, what other options are there to make the Mighty Ducks a better hockey team? After three seasons of subpar play, it would seem drastic measures are the only logical solution. Agreed?
—Danny Sullivan, Irvine, Calif.

The Ducks have the same options as every club, but they just don't seem particularly intent on making anything happen out there. They desperately need a good, physical defenseman and they really need depth both on the blueline and at forward.

The problem is that ownership doesn't particularly mind if the club loses as long as it isn't hemorrhaging money. With some $18 million tied up in Selanne and Kariya it's hard for management to make other significant budget commitments. If Anaheim could get into the playoffs and host a few games, the Ducks brass would be thrilled. Sadly for them, the Ducks have few young players who are making an impact in the NHL. What they need to do is bring up talent from within, and they haven't able to do that.

Gauthier hasn't been shy about making moves. He has changed the roster quite a bit during the past year it's just that bringing in guys like German Titov and Tony Hrkac is not going to cut it.

The Ducks' bleak situation the past few years continues to make Anaheim fans appreciate what Ronnie Wilson did out there before he got canned.

On the subject of overtime losses, why doesn't the league simply award three points for a win and one point for a tie? That way, a win and a loss would be worth more than two ties. And you wouldn't see teams packing it in the last five minutes of a game to get the guaranteed point. I think it would make for better finishes.
—John Quill, Plymouth, Mass.

It's an idea that's been tossed around, and not a bad one, but it's too drastic at this point. The OTL situation is a bit of nuisance but if you start giving three points for a win you'll get teams putting up 150-point seasons and the like, and that would be a seismic shift in NHL record keeping.

Saku Koivu has a lot of talent, but he keeps getting hurt and seems to seriously damage the chances of this club, perhaps due to the lack of talent elsewhere on the team. Do you think the Canadiens will make a move this season to trade him? And will they be able to get anything in return, perhaps from a deeper team such as San Jose or New Jersey?
—John Bell, Fort St. John, British Columbia

If Koivu can come back and show that his left knee is sound and that he can still juke, he'll have some trade value. And the Canadiens would be wise to deal him. There's no denying his skills. What the Canadiens have found out -- too late -- is that he's not a player good enough to build a team around. But he can be a neat spark for a good club. New Jersey might be a good fit. With Koivu and Scott Gomez and John Madden running around they'd have a lot of little Devils flitting about.

What do you think of the young players on the New York Rangers? They seem to be better than in recent years. Mike York is great in both ends of the rink, and he's developing into a real leader for the Rangers. Plus, guys like Jan Hlavac, Radek Dvorak and Kim Jonsson play significant roles every night. I'm more excited about the young guns on this team than I have been in a long time.
—Eric Quail, Suffern, N.Y.

I remember seeing York at the NCAA Frozen Four a couple of years ago and thinking what a splendid two-way player he was. He's really solid defensively in addition to his obvious offensive assets. Yes, the Rangers have some good young talent -- not an overwhelming abundance but certainly more than they've had in years. Center Manny Malhotra is close to becoming a regular contributor and Mike Mottau may develop into a top-four blueliner. If Pavel Brendl and/or Jamie Lundmark can make an effective transition into the NHL, New York will have a swell young core.

This is what made it so hard for Neil Smith when he was fired as GM last year. He put together a lot of this team and knew that it was close to becoming at least respectable. I'm not saying Smith shouldn't have been let go -- he was afforded a long run in New York -- but he will have had a big hand in the Rangers' future as they improve.

Sports Illustrated staff writer Kostya Kennedy covers the NHL and is a regular contributor to CNNSI.com. To send a question to his mailbag, click here.

 
Related information
Stories
Previous mailbag: Point, counterpoint
Multimedia
Visit Multimedia Central for the latest audio and video
Search our site Watch CNN/SI 24 hours a day
Sports Illustrated and CNN have combined to form a 24 hour sports news and information channel. To receive CNN/SI at your home call your cable operator or DirecTV.


CNNSI Copyright © 2001
CNN/Sports Illustrated
An AOL Time Warner Company.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.