|
On boxers and boxes Posted: Wednesday February 17, 1999 11:59 AM
In the last 40 years, since a young man from Louisville strode, open-mouthed, onto the stage at the Rome Olympics, there have really only been two boxers who have moved into the broad public consciousness. Oh, yes, George Foreman amused us, and Sugar Ray Leonard was charming -- especially since he was much too cute to be a fighter ... but really, the only two boxers who found their way into our cultural enyclopedia were that loquacious lad from Louisville who would become Muhammad Ali, and that sad, brutish misfit of a manchild named Mike Tyson. So, if ever the alpha and the omega of one sport flashed before our eyes together, it was last week when, on one day, Ali was put on a Wheaties box, and on the next, when Tyson was returned to reside within another kind of box. It would be easy to leave them at that, the curious juxtaposition of the beloved and the reviled, but ... no. The greater irony is how that came to be. We must not forget that there was a time when Muhammad Ali -- he who would light the Olympic flame, he who is adored as a kind of saint of sweat wherever he alights upon this earth, he who is now prominently upon your dining room table, there with you, as you partake of your Breakfast of Champions -- was held once, by many Americans, in as much contempt as Tyson is today. And there was a time when Tyson was perceived as a precious kind of paradox -- a vicious slugger in the ring, but outside: a gentle creature who loved his pigeons, a serious student of boxing history, a rehabilitated child of the streets. The fact is that, on the evidence most of us had, the wires were crossed. The boorish young Muhammad Ali was supposed to end up as the sensitive young Mike Tyson has -- and vice versa. Part of the lesson here is simply the old one: don't believe everything you read. Now, of course, we know: Tyson was obviously never clear of the musty shadows of his past nor of the raging demons of his soul. And Ali, for all his braggadocio and his ugly dalliance with racial division, was either only having a little fun or, well -- testing life, testing us, going through phases. But, in the crux, as in the ring, he always instinctively did right. It's just that, as Tyson falls back naturally on brutality, Ali inclines to sweet charity. It almost makes you believe in predestination, or, anyway, in a selective original sin. While he was in New York to enter the Wheaties realm, Ali and his wife, Lonnie, were also carrying on their mission to raise funds to build the Muhammad Ali Center on the Louisville riverfront. Notably, the huge project will not be, foremost, a museum. Rather, the prime mission of the Muhammad Ali Center is to encourage inspiration -- especially in children, in those children anywhere in the world who are so impoverished of self and spirit that they dare not dream. Well, as grand -- almost presumptuous -- as that ideal is, who better to represent it than Muhammad Ali? Of course, Ali and Tyson had much in common as children, didn't they? They were both uneducated minority kids from the fringe of American society whose fists were their only way up and out. So their very uncommon adult experience only shows us again that, as sport can make little lives larger, it still leaves for the athletes the task of making themselves as people. These commentaries, which appear each Wednesday on National Public Radio's Morning Edition, are posted weekly by CNN/SI.
| |||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 1999 CNN/SI. A Time Warner Company. Terms under which this service is provided to you.
| |||||||||||||||||