|
| |
![]() |
|
|
RE: Fans' e-mail Everyone has opinion and is happy to expresss itPosted: Tuesday November 26, 2002 12:26 PM
Fans make the NASCAR world go 'round (just ask 'em; enough of the gas-fume fanatics have e-mailed saying just that). Fans also have an opinion or two on the media's opinions (yep, gotten a few of those, too). As the holiday season beckons, I thought it would be nice to share some of the more heartfelt, thought-provoking submissions from fans.
Welcome to Anger Management 101; take the seat next to Tony Stewart. ... We'll address your other conflict -- "screwed by NASCAR at the finish" but nonetheless "leave NASCAR like it is" -- for next semester, when we discuss having your cake and eating it, too, as NASCAR is wanting to do.
I'll let e-mailer Peter answer: "I could not agree more for changing the way NASCAR operates. They are taking the excitement of allowing drivers to race to their capabilities. Safety rules, yes, but get on with it and stop sitting on their hands. If a car passes initial inspection, why do they have to go through another under a microscope?" And then there's this from David: "Give the race car drivers their cars back; get rid of the spoilers and put the soft tires back on. An experienced driver used to mean something; today anybody can aim a car and push the gas!" It used to be that going to a stock car race meant pulling for a recognized brand; strip the bowties, blue ovals and other medallions off the cars now and fans can't tell the difference between Chevy, Ford, Pontiac or Dodge. ... It's supposed to be the National Associated for Stock Car Auto Racing. As for something good about NASCAR ... well, umm ... next.
Fact is Gibbs did provide security for Stewart down the stretch, but opted not to have the "babysitting," as you succinctly put it, for the season-ending race. And wouldn't you know it, there was another incident between Stewart and a member of the media. It's just something that could have been avoided.
Anyone want to disagree on this one? Didn't think so.
Exhibit A: Steve Park. Still want to argue? Exhibit B: Ernie Irvan.
Tim from Saugerties, N.Y., concurs with banning the Bodines, and adds Robby Gordon also should be on the list. Me? I like the Bodines. Hey, somebody's gotta finish last, right? Like the media, many fans have their opinions about what will make the sport better. Drivers, points, templates, rules ... it's all there for arguing. NASCAR's take: As long as you're talking, arguing, fighting about the sport, it's all good; any publicity is good publicity.
Actually, dinner will be at mom's; she loves me just because -- and never says anything like my next e-mailer:
Happy holidays, y'all ... even you, Paboman. And as for that "something good about NASCAR," I hear Playboy wants a Women of NASCAR with all the Miss Winstons. Maybe the ladies showing their "viewed from the back" will get folks off mine. B. Duane Cross is a senior producer for CNNSI.com.
Got a comment, question or scoop for Duane? Click here.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||