![]() | |
|
EVENTS Fantasy Central Inside Game Multimedia Central Statitudes Your Turn Message Boards Email Newsletters Golf Guide Cities Work in Sports
CNNSI.com GROUP
COMMERCE |
Armas in the clear -- but should he be?
This week's question | Quote of the week | Game of the week Sources close to the situation tell me that FIFA will announce on Friday that it has cleared U.S. midfielder Chris Armas to play for the Americans in World Cup qualifying, thus denying the formal protest filed by Guatemala following last week's 1-1 draw between the two countries in Mazatenango. In its protest, the Guatemalan federation charged that Armas was ineligible to play for the United States, citing details that have have been public for some time. A Bronx native whose mother is Puerto Rican, Armas played in five games for Puerto Rico (a separate team from the U.S. squad) in the 1993 Shell Caribbean Cup. According to Article 18 of the Regulations Governing the Application of FIFA Statutes, "any player who is qualified to play for more than one national association (i.e., who has dual nationality) will be deemed to have committed himself to one association only when he plays his first international match in an official competition (at any level) for that association."
The question is what exactly FIFA considers "an official competition." In November 1998, FIFA cleared Armas to play for the U.S., ruling that the 1993 Shell Caribbean Cup was not an official FIFA competition because it did not serve that year as a qualifying event for a FIFA tournament. Later Shell Cups were official events, however, because they served as qualifiers for the CONCACAF Gold Cup, which is itself a qualifier for FIFA's Confederations Cup. Confused? You're not the only one. What matters most, of course, is that FIFA's final answer is that 1) Armas can play, and 2) the U.S. gets to keep the point it earned in Guatemala. But whether Armas should in fact be eligible to play for the U.S. is another matter. After all, the spirit of the rule is that once you've played for one country, you can't play for another. But by FIFA's logic, Armas still could have played for Puerto Rico if it had been invited in this year's U.S. Cup, simply because the tournament didn't serve as a qualifier for a FIFA event. That's messed up. What's more, while FIFA nowhere defines an "official competition" in its literature, it does say in Article 4 of the Regulations that "international football matches recognised by the Federation shall be those between two national associations affiliated to the Federation and for which each association fields a representative national team." Armas's participation with Puerto Rico fits that description. In any case, Armas is a splendid player for the U.S., and he happens to be as nice a guy as any you'll meet in sports. He's a classic example of a player who has worked his butt off and has steadily improved to the point that he's the best defensive midfielder in this country. Ultimately, the U.S. is lucky to have a player of Armas's caliber -- and, judging by the evidence, lucky to have Armas, period. Razov rings the bellFor an SI survey in the summer of 1998, I asked each MLS coach to name his hypothetical starting lineup for the U.S. in World Cup 2002. At the time, one coach surprisingly listed a forward who, after riding the pine in L.A. for two seasons, was only playing as a regular for the first time that year for the Chicago Fire. The coach was former D.C. United coach Bruce Arena, now the U.S. men's coach. And the player was Ante Razov. While Arena could hardly have known how well Razov would adapt to the international game, his hunch is looking awfully good two years later. With three goals in his last three games for the U.S., Razov is clamping a vise grip on one of the starting striker spots heading into the meat of World Cup qualifying. "[Arena] had me in '96 [as the Olympic team coach], so he knew I had some talent," Razov says, "but he also saw that I also had some maturing to do." Razov acknowledges that he can still be his own worst critic, and both Fire coach Bob Bradley and Arena have worked hard to keep him from getting too down on himself. Before Razov scored the lone U.S. goal against Guatemala last week, Arena's last words were to "relax and have fun." Says Razov, "I've got a lot of confidence in myself, and when things don't go right I can get pretty upset. I have lofty standards, and some people say I'm reaching a little, but I think I could be a really good player at the next level." He means Europe, of course, which is where Razov hopes to go after his MLS contract runs out at the end of the season. If he continues on his current tear, look for some suitors to start lining up soon. This week's Question(s): Skills Test No. 1For this week's survey, 23 MLS players responded to the first of several skills inquiries: Who is MLS's 1) most dangerous free-kick taker; and 2) most elusive dribbler in tight space? Players weren't allowed to vote for their own teammates, which makes D.C. United's dominance in these two categories all the more impressive -- especially for a team with the worst record in the league. The results: Most dangerous free-kick taker Marco Etcheverry, D.C. United
13.0
Players receiving a single vote: Mauricio Cienfuegos (L.A. Galaxy), Robert Warzycha (Columbus Crew), Eric Wynalda (N.E. Revolution) Most elusive dribbler in tight space Jaime Moreno, D.C. United
7.3
Players receiving a single vote: Jeff Cunningham (Columbus Crew), Roy Myers (MetroStars), Peter Nowak (Chicago Fire), Carlos Valderrama (T.B. Mutiny), Andy Williams (Miami Fusion) No surprise with Moreno at No. 1, but Chung at No. 2? More evidence that he's one the league's most underrated players. (FYI, MetroFans, Great Inca has no access to my surveys.) Garth Lagerwey does, however,which brings us to the ...
Garth Lagerwey
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related information | |
| Stories | |
|
| |
| Multimedia | |
|
| |
| Search our site | Watch CNN/SI 24 hours a day |
| Sports Illustrated and CNN have combined to form a 24 hour sports news and information channel. To receive CNN/SI at your home call your cable operator or DirecTV. | |
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
|