|
| |
![]() |
|
|
Who'd win an alumni tournament? Posted: Wednesday January 16, 2002 11:49 AMUpdated: Friday January 18, 2002 4:14 PM
Sports Illustrated senior writer Grant Wahl answers your college basketball questions every Wednesday. Click here to send him a question. SOMEWHERE IN KANSAS ABOARD THE JAYHAWKS' TEAM BUS -- I'll fill you in soon enough on why I'm here, but let's just say that after their rout of Oklahoma State Tuesday night, the Kansas Jayhawks were in excellent spirits on the ride home. So excellent, in fact, that for nearly an hour Nick Collison, Drew Gooden and I collaborated on answering a first-rate question from Dave in Brookline, Mass.: "A challenge for you: My roommates and I were picking the best 'post-1985 all-star team' from any school. The two best teams we came up with were Michigan ( Rumeal Robinson, Jalen Rose, Glen Rice, Juwan Howard and Chris Webber ) and Syracuse ( Pearl Washington, Lawrence Moten, Billy Owens, John Wallace and Derrick Coleman ). Whom do you like? Can you find any better teams? Three rules: Players are only from '86 on, college performance (not pro) is all that matters, and you must get players somewhat in position (i.e., you can't have five small forwards on your team)." This is a solid parlor game, particularly because of the pre-1986 cutoff, which times things perfectly for me to the days when I started going nuts about college hoops. DISCLAIMER: There will probably be an omission or two, but lay off. We were on a bus. It was 2:30 in the morning. We were working from memory. We're not infallible. (Well, Nick and Drew aren't, at least.) Without further ado, our top 20 (any better suggestions can be sent here): 1. Duke
2. Michigan
3. North Carolina
4. Kansas
5. Kentucky
6. Syracuse
7. UNLV
8. Georgetown
9. UCLA
10. Connecticut
11. Michigan State
12. Arizona
13. LSU
14. Maryland
15. Cincinnati
16. Georgia Tech
17. Indiana
18. Arkansas
19. Cal
20. Illinois
Questions, questions I appreciated the review of your preseason picks, but I'm not sure how you can see your pick of Maryland at No. 12 as a push. Yes, Oklahoma clobbered the Terps last month, but: a) it was their first game back after a two-week layoff; and b) in the very same column you note that the Sooners are damn good. Maryland dismantled an Illinois team that you consider yourself to have hit the target on by picking them fifth. Finally, Maryland flushed N.C. State at Raleigh. State has now beaten two top-10 teams on the road (Syracuse and Virginia), which is no mean feat.
Got a lot of heat from Maryland folks this week, but Doug's note was the most polite, so we'll give him some love. Not too much, though. Look, the Terps are a good team, the second-best in the ACC. They're solid on the perimeter and -- despite Lonny Baxter's lack of height -- on the inside as well. They have a wealth of big-game experience, and I'm seeing signs that Gary Williams has learned not to have a coronary after every loss. Yet I've always felt that really good teams don't get blown out, ever, hence my reservations about Maryland (blowout loss at Oklahoma) and Arizona (huge loss at Oregon). At the very least, the Terps shouldn't be ranked ahead of the Sooners (they are), but I'd say they're actually closer to No. 7 than No. 3. That's why I'd call it a push. How good is Jason Kapono and does he have the leadership skills to bring UCLA to a 14th Final Four appearance?
I'm still asking myself how good Kapono is after seeing him twice in person last week -- against USC and Kansas. Perhaps it's because Matt Barnes is on such a roll these days, but Kapono doesn't strike me as a take-charge guy who can turn games around merely with his will. In other words, I don't know if his heart is always in it, which isn't a good sign. In fact, I found myself thinking that Barnes is twice as tough as anybody else on the UCLA team. Clearly, Kapono is the best shooter the Bruins have, but I'd argue that UCLA's fate this season will be decided by Barnes' competitive fire -- and whether or not it rubs off on the rest of his teammates. When will the rest of the country take Cincinnati as a serious Final Four contender? The Bearcats are ranked No. 1 in the Sagarin, top five in the RPI and have a top-three team defense with an astounding average scoring margin. Their only loss is a road loss at Oklahoma State to open the season. If they had chosen a cupcake as opposed to a fellow Final Four contender to start the season, they may well be undefeated.
Given that I started writing this column in the very same Stillwater Holiday Inn where the Bearcats stayed earlier this season, let me offer another reason why the Bearcats lost there: The hotels suck. Never underestimate how much crappy lodging can affect a team's performance. The only bonus is that there's an indoor hot tub where you can re-enact the famous UNLV photograph we talked about last week. I fully expect Cincy will win C-USA for the 88th straight year, but I'm more dubious of the Bearcats making the Final Four. True, they have good guard play with Steve Logan and Leonard Stokes, and their defense is impeccable (though don't you wish they would go back to the Melvin Levett -led full-court press?), but I'm not sold yet on their inside attack. After a tough 11 years of rebuilding, rebuilding and more rebuilding, UNLV fans have had to swallow their pride and look to the future. We don't appreciate you digging up the ugly past for your own entertainment. The hot-tub photos sparked the downfall of our program, and now years later we're still hearing about it. We have some great kids, a clean coach and some good games to talk about. How about a little positive pub once in a while?
I'll be positive: Vegas is an excellent city ... to fly over. Sorry for the breezy 'Bag this week, folks. WATN and all your other favorite stuff will be back next week. Click here to send your college basketball question to Grant Wahl.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||