Shop Fantasy Central Golf Guide Email Travel Subscribe SI About Us Inside Game Gang

 
  U.S. SPORTS
  scoreboards
baseball S
pro football S
col. football S
pro basketball S
m. college bb S
w. college bb S
hockey S
golf plus S
tennis S
soccer S
motor sports
olympic sports
women's sports
more sports
 WORLD SPORT

EVENTS
 Sportsman of the Year
 Heisman Trophy
 Swimsuit 2001

CENTERS
 Fantasy Central
 Inside Game
 Video Plus
 Statitudes
 Your Turn
 Message Boards
 Email Newsletters
 Golf Guide
 Cities
 

CNNSI.com GROUP
 Sports Illustrated
 Life of Reilly
 SI Women
 SI for Kids
 Press Room
 TBS/TNT Sports
 CNN Languages

COMMERCE
 SI Customer Service
 SI Media Kits
 Get into College
 Sports Memorabilia
 TeamStore

Newer clubs definitely work

Click here for more on this story
Posted: Wednesday March 21, 2001 2:13 PM

  Click for archive

Golf equipment has never generated quite this much buzz -- and, finally, justifiably so.

For a long time I considered the majority of equipment claims to be mostly hype. And history has shown that for a lot of years the innovations in golf clubs simply didn't amount to very much. But I've become convinced that the new stuff from the last few years is discernably better, and all the recent records on the pro tours basically prove it.

 
MAIL CALL
Regarding ShotLink, isn't a player only allowed to consult his caddie regarding course information? On every TV broadcast an announcer will remark, "No one reads that break properly; it doesn't go left." Surely, having a caddie listen in to the telecast to make use of that information is a violation of the rules?
—Tim Parr, Ridgecrest, Calif.

It's not a violation of the rules for players to learn what clubs other players are using by watching television, and it never has been. It follows that it will not be a violation of the rules for players or their caddies to consult ShotLink information when off the golf course. The fact is there is really very little players can learn about a specific shot that they don't already know, especially if they are going to be hitting hours later. As you might already know, while it is illegal to ask another player what he hit, there is nothing in the rules that prohibits a player from looking in a competitor's bag to see what club was used.

Knowing how the best 200 golfers in the world play their games has very little to do with how the rest of us play. Knowing how we play our games is what's really important. Thirteen million dollars could be better spent on programs for juniors and inner-city kids.
—Frank Giardino, Avon Lake, Ohio

You may be right about better ways to spend the money, but I think there is a lot to be learned from how the best in the world compete. Don't you think watching and learning how Tiger Woods plays the game is influencing and shaping today's juniors?

I dislike the idea of ShotLink. I am a computer technician who plays recreational golf and enjoys watching the pros play. We have enough information already. What we do need is more exposure of players regardless of their position in a tournament. I grow weary of telecasts showing only the leaders or a shot by some player not in contention, which by virtue of its being shown at that time pretty much tells us that it will be a good one.
—Dan Dawson, North Vancouver, British Columbia

If ShotLink works you will know every shot hit by every player, whether they're in contention or not. That might satisfy some of your desire for more exposure of different players. By the way, if you want to watch a lot of random shots, good and bad, by players in or out of the hunt, go overseas during this year's British Open and check out how the BBC covers golf. It has a languid pace, too languid for the tastes of American network executives and, I'm sure, of most of the American public.

I have been an avid golfer for more than 25 years and play a respectable game. The recent expansion of golf coverage increases the number of dull topics covered. Analyzing additional statistics is just a continuation of the trend. I've cancelled subscriptions to golf magazines and watch less and less golf on TV.
—John Sumi, Madison, Wis.

Given your intolerance with most golf coverage, I'm flattered you even made it through last week's column. In my opinion, golf telecasts and golf writing have both gotten more interesting. You can't tell me watching the last four holes with fixed cameras and often uninformed announcers was less dull than even the worst of what we watch now. Before you cancel another subscription, turn off the tube or quit reading this sentence, consider this: The more you learn from all this increased coverage, the better chance you will have to improve your own game. Knowledge is power.

Is Tiger Woods the only pro golfer to yell "Fore!" after a wayward shot? I can't recall any other players doing it. There's a great likelihood I could be wrong, seeing how he monopolizes network coverage. Either way, kudos to him for displaying that kind of golfing etiquette.
—Brian, New York City

Actually, "Fore!" is the closest Tiger can come to saying what he really wants to say and get away with it. So I suppose kudos are in order.

I've always been drawn to the accouterments of sports -- mostly, I'm sure, as some sort of compensation. I've always had a vague notion that appreciating and owning the best stuff would enhance my ability. Maybe, maybe not. I do know that I've never been as good as my equipment.

My fascination with sporting goods started when my mom and aunt would go shopping at the old Roos Bros. store in downtown San Francisco and leave my cousin and I in the ground floor sporting-goods department. I loved the smell and feel of the new gloves, the leather footballs and basketballs, all the authentic 49ers and Giants paraphernalia. My first baseball bat was purchased at Roos Bros. -- a 28-inch Hank Aaron -model Louisville Slugger -- and I bought my first glove there, a Tito Francona Rawlings.

I developed the same jones in golf. I remember going to Harding Park with my dad when I was about eight or nine and being captivated by a complete set of Ben Hogan junior clubs -- called Little Bens -- on display in the pro shop. On my 12th birthday I received my first complete set: three cherry-finished persimmon woods and 10 forged blades -- ladies weight and length -- by J.C. Higgins. My father bought them from his friend, Lou Ortiz, who for some reason had them in the tiny Alabama Street machine shop where he had just started Orlimar golf.

I don't know what happened to those clubs, but ever since I've hung onto my personal favorites. After years of searching through used-club barrels, making some shrewd and not so shrewd trades, and general, old-fashioned acquisitiveness, I've accumulated a nice collection from the 1960s, '70s and '80s.

I've got persimmon woods by great old companies like Wood Brothers, MacGregor, Cleveland Classic, Kenneth Smith, Orlimar, Toney Penna and Powerbilt, plus a few brands you've never heard of, like Giannini. My most prized irons are a set of Spalding Top Flite with a sombrero insignia, and LT Grind stamped on the hosel. When I showed these to Lee Trevino, he smiled and informed me that only a few such sets were ever made. In my tour bag full of miscellaneous clubs is an old Maruman 3-wood that belonged to Laura Davies, a Scotty Cameron putter used by Mike Donald, a Zevo wedge and Ping putter that Tiger Woods gave trial runs, and a Gary Player sand wedge that once was in the bag of Gary Player.

I'm not keeping these clubs as an investment or anything. I picked them up them for the same reason I was drawn to the sporting goods at Roos Bros. And also because I wanted to use them, not just look at them. It was fun to have clubs my playing partners admired or were curious about.

The fact is, though, I've stopped acquiring and using the old stuff. It doesn't make much sense anymore. The new stuff is better.

My nine-degree titanium driver with a 300 cc head is straighter and longer -- and produces a more penetrating flight -- than anything I've ever used. On bad hits, the ball doesn't curve as much or lose as much distance.

The 14.5-degree fairway wood I'm using is long but also more versatile than any 3-wood I've ever had.

I recently tried one of those so-called hybrid "iron-woods." My 18-degree model hits it farther than any 1- or 2-iron I've ever played, but is easier to hit. It is a great club to use into the wind when you need distance, and ideal for a tee shot to a narrow fairway.

I have new models in both perimeter-weighted irons and forged blades. The perimeter-weighted heads produce a little more distance and are easier to hit in the long irons. The forged irons perform better than previous blade models in part because they've been built with that little extra bit of bounce more suited to today's closer-cropped fairway conditions.

Recently, Art Chou of fledgling Pixel Golf sent me a lob wedge to try (yes, golf writers get equipment sent to them on occasion). I already had a 1986 Wilson 60-degree wedge designed by Tom Kite that fulfilled my compulsion for performance and rare vintage. But the Pixel wedge has the narrower flange and less bounce, allowing me to hit a little farther if I want to and making it more versatile from different lies. And there is something about those pixels that feels great. So this wedge is in the bag.

What's it all mean?

Well, we can't discount that golf balls simultaneously are gaining distance and becoming easier to control. But that said, golf clubs are clearly better. It's definitely making the game easier, but in a meaningful sense only for those who know what they are doing. While all these records are being set on the tours, the average handicap is still 19. So the biggest effect of improved equipment is widening the gap between the accomplished and average player.

The way to address that is to establish two sets of rules governing equipment. But that's a matter for another column.

Sports Illustrated senior writer Jaime Diaz is a regular contributor to the magazine's Golf Plus edition. Click here to send him a question or comment.

 
Related information
Stories
Jaime Diaz's Golfhead Archive
Multimedia
Visit Multimedia Central for the latest audio and video
Search our site Watch CNN/SI 24 hours a day
Sports Illustrated and CNN have combined to form a 24 hour sports news and information channel. To receive CNN/SI at your home call your cable operator or DirecTV.


CNNSI Copyright © 2001
CNN/Sports Illustrated
An AOL Time Warner Company.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.