Shop Fantasy Central Golf Guide Email Travel Subscribe SI About Us Inside Game Gang

 

EVENTS
 Sportsman of the Year
 Heisman Trophy
 Swimsuit 2001

CENTERS
 Fantasy Central
 Inside Game
 Video Plus
 Statitudes
 Your Turn
 Message Boards
 Email Newsletters
 Golf Guide
 Cities
 

CNNSI.com GROUP
 Sports Illustrated
 Life of Reilly
 SI Women
 SI for Kids
 Press Room
 TBS/TNT Sports
 CNN Languages

COMMERCE
 SI Customer Service
 SI Media Kits
 Get into College
 Sports Memorabilia
 TeamStore

Battle plan

Last place to resolve principle is in a civil damages suit

Click here for more on this story
Posted: Wednesday November 07, 2001 8:28 AM
 

The most hopeful thing you can say about Kelci Stringer's planned wrongful death lawsuit against Minnesota Vikings coaches and players is that she starts out third-and-long.

The widow and her attorneys face a real battle as they try to pin responsibility for the death of Korey Stringer on his fellow employees, head coach Dennis Green, trainer Chuck Barta and their assistants. The law of Minnesota, like most of the 50 states, limits claims for a death at work to workers' compensation. To move beyond the benefits available under workers' compensation, Kelci Stringer must somehow show that the coaches and the trainers were guilty of "gross" or "willful" conduct. A simple error of judgment is not enough. Negligence is not enough. The challenge will be to convince a jury in the Twin Cities that the coaches and the trainers had a reckless or conscious disregard for Korey Stringer's health and welfare.

Search for answers
The widow of former Vikings All-Pro tackle Korey Stringer has outlined to Sports Illustrated's Don Banks the $100 million-plus wrongful death lawsuit she intends to file against the team after his death Aug. 1 from heatstroke complications. "I need to know what happened to my husband," says Kelci Stringer.

  • Complete story, click here
  •  
     

    The Vikings' insurance company and its attorneys will ask, quite reasonably, why coaches and trainers would deliberately injure a star player in whom they had invested millions of dollars. It will be an inquiry that will be difficult to answer. For Kelci Stringer to prevail, she will need proof, probably from other players, that the trainers ignored Korey Stringer's distress and ignored it more than once.

    Her lawsuit against the team physicians will be less difficult. Her lead attorney, Stanley Chesley, and his firm are veterans of many liability cases against hospitals and physicians. They will be able to produce experts who will criticize everything that happened, from the team physical to the moment of death. It's the kind of things the great trial lawyers, like Chesley, are able to do. And the timeline of events leading to Korey Stringer's death offers them a promising place to start.

    Here are some other things about the Stringer lawsuit that may prove to be interesting:

  • Contract Money: A claim for damages against the Vikings gives Kelci Stringer significant tax leverage on the money promised to Korey Stringer in his restructured contract. If the Vikings were to pay Kelci under Korey's contract, it would be taxable income. If they pay Kelci as part of a damages settlement, it is not taxable income, a huge savings for the Stringer family.

    Dick Butkus, a Hall of Fame linebacker of the Chicago Bears, settled medical malpractice claim against the Bears' team physician at the end of his career. The settlement also resolved a contract dispute, and all of it was treated as non-taxable money for Butkus. It is a model for Kelci Stringer to follow.

  • File Suit Immediately: It is difficult to comprehend why Kelci Stringer would wait until the end of the season to file her lawsuit. Any distraction caused by the lawsuit would be barely noticeable in the distraction already plaguing the Vikings since Korey Stringer's death.

    What is she waiting for? It will be at least a year after the date of filing before she approaches the time of trial. Isn't it better to file now and start the clock running toward a trial date?

  • Settlement Leverage: Perhaps Kelci Stringer and her attorneys are hoping to establish settlement leverage by talking about the suit months before they actually file. It is not a bad idea. Their goal should be to put together a global settlement with the Vikings and the insurance companies involved. The necessary people include insurers of the physician, the hospital, the coaches, the trainers and the workers compensation carrier.

    The best way to get them all together is to file suit and ask the judge to call a settlement conference. If there is any good will left between Kelci Stringer and the Vikings, they could get together on a voluntary basis to explore the settlement prospects.

  • Forget About An Apology: Kelci Stringer is concerned about the behavior of Vikings' officials. They have tried to cover things up, she suspects. She is still waiting for an apology. She undoubtedly feels there is some matter of principle in here somewhere.

    The last place to resolve a matter of principle is in a civil damages lawsuit. If it's principle she's concerned, she should get together with team owner Red McCombs and Green and try to work out a settlement.

    Sports Illustrated legal analyst Lester Munson regularly holds court on sports law and business matters on CNNSI.com.

    The opinions expressed here are solely those of the writer.


     
    Related information
    Multimedia
    Visit Video Plus for the latest audio and video
    Search our site Watch CNN/SI 24 hours a day
    Sports Illustrated and CNN have combined to form a 24 hour sports news and information channel. To receive CNN/SI at your home call your cable operator or DirecTV.


    CNNSI Copyright © 2001
    CNN/Sports Illustrated
    An AOL Time Warner Company.
    All Rights Reserved.

    Terms under which this service is provided to you.
    Read our privacy guidelines.