|
| |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Inside College Basketball Posted: Tuesday March 05, 2002 1:34 PMConference tournaments work for mid-major leagues, but they encourage top teams to tank By Seth Davis
Last year's Big Ten tournament was an especially irrelevant exercise. Michigan State lost in the quarterfinals, and Illinois lost in the semifinals, but both teams still ended up receiving No. 1 seeds in the NCAA tournament. (The Spartans reached the Final Four, while the Illini lost in the Midwest Regional final.) Meanwhile, Iowa (7-9 in league play) beat Indiana (10-6) in a ragged final. The Hoosiers would go on to lose in the first round of the NCAAs, and the Hawkeyes would fall in the second. "We benefited by going home after the semis," Illinois coach Bill Self says. "The conference tournament creates enthusiasm and makes money, but I think teams at the top can take them or leave them." That also was true in last year's Big 12 conference tournament. Third-seeded Oklahoma beat fourth-seeded Texas 54-45 in an unentertaining and debilitating final. Both the Sooners and the Longhorns went on to lose in the first round of the NCAAs, and Oklahoma coach Kelvin Sampson thinks winning the conference tournament may have hurt his team. Had the Sooners lost in the first round of the Big 12 tournament, "it would have been a lot easier to convince the players they weren't as good as they thought they were," said Sampson. Advocates of conference tournaments argue that they can serve as springboards to NCAA tournament success, but the evidence suggests the opposite is true. The Big East has placed five teams in the Final Four in the last 15 years, but only one of them -- Connecticut in 1999 -- also won the league's tournament. The Big Ten has had five teams in the Final Four since it started playing a tournament in 1998, but three of them didn't even make it to the league's championship game. Occasionally a team that might not otherwise have made the NCAA tournament will win its conference tournament and have success in it. (The most notable example is the 1983 North Carolina State team, which swept through the ACC tournament on its way to a national title.) That, however, doesn't make it bearable to watch so many top teams tank in their conference tournaments. Georgia coach Jim Harrick, for one, suggests that in place of the current setup, the NCAA tournament should start a week earlier and include all 324 Division I teams. "Everybody gets excited about the NCAA tournament. Let's tee it up and go play," Harrick says. That plan, though enticing, would make the regular season totally irrelevant. It would be far better to restore the integrity of the season for leagues that get multiple bids by ditching the money-grabbing tournaments. Issue date: March 11, 2002
For more Inside College Basketball see this week's issue of Sports Illustrated, on newsstands Wednesday, March 6. Click here to subscribe to SI.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||