|
| |
![]() |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hard drive Stewart knows there's no 'gentleman's agreement' in racingPosted: Monday June 09, 2003 2:48 PM
Whether or not you were happy to see Tony Stewart win Sunday, you at least have to be happy he won the race on the up and up -- which wouldn't have been the case if he'd had his way the week before. (Forgive me for the tardy rant; I was on vacation last week.) Stewart, as you may remember, was dominating Dover when he was penalized a lap for pitting out of his stall. He nearly got his lap back, but Ryan Newman wouldn't let him have it. Stewart went nuts, trying to bump him and then generally behaving like an infant following the race, doing all sorts of screaming and, one suspects, threatening to hold his breath until he turned blue. Whether he deserved to be penalized is debatable. Whether Newman should have laid down and said, "Here, why don't I make it easier for me to lose this race?" isn't. What gives Stewart the right to expect a competitor to give him a leg up? A gentlemen's agreement? Please. He's no gentleman. He showed that with his histrionics, which, I've got to say, can no longer be written off as "competitiveness" or "intensity." Had Newman given him his lap back and he would have won (which seemed like a very real possibility), it would have been a tainted -- not to mention ridiculous -- victory. "That'll come back around," said Greg Zipadelli, Stewart's crew chief. "Next week at Pocono, I guarantee you nobody gets a lap back if we're leading." That's the way it was, and that's the way it always should have been.
Once again, not a single one of you wrote asking where I was last week. Kind of makes me feel unloved. I saw the greatest sporting spectacle of my life, the UEFA Champions League final. Juventus and AC Milan, two of the most storied soccer teams in the world. But you didn't ask, so I'm not telling any more. Mike in Green Bay did have some questions (and some nice words). One of them was a non-NASCAR issue: "This is off the NASCAR track, but did you read the inane quote by Danica Patrick in the April issue of FHM? I suppose (I hope) all her smack talking is just for effect, to help sell more magazines so the advertisers can reach the precious 18-30 year old demographic group, but she comes off sounding like a total idiot. I hope she doesn't seriously think she's going to run anyone off the road at 170 mph. There's a right way and a wrong way to go about things in major league racing. Apparently she doesn't understand the diference. Maybe she's a slow learner and will have to be shown a time or two until she gets the message." No, Mike, I didn't see it. So I went to the FHM Web site and, good gravy, is that one good looking woman. Yowza. Man oh man. Anyways, this is leading somewhere. I'm a little curious what you, my loyal readers, think of women as drivers. (In NASCAR, I mean.) Thoughts?
It's off to Michigan, which is, except for Atlanta, the fastest track out there. Usually gives pretty good races, though not nearly as good as the open-wheel races at the track. The CART race there a couple years back was simply the most exhilirating finish I've seen. Anyhoo, handicapping the weekend is tough. No one team does appreciably better than the others here. The racing is generally clean, and if someone is strong in qualifying they're usually strong on Sunday. (Nearly half of the winners have started in the first two rows.) But on the other hand, at last year's second race, seven of the top nine finishers started 15th or worse. As for a pattern, that's all I can come up with. And reading back over it, I see that's no pattern at all. I'll take Bobby Labonte, because he's hot and he does well here.
Mark Bechtel covers NASCAR for Sports Illustrated and SI.com.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||