|
Half empty
Despite splits, underdog Twins and Angels have uphill battle
Posted: Friday October 04, 2002 11:56 AM
The Twins were hammered by the A's on Wednesday in Game 2 of their Division Series, but it was hard to find anyone moping in the Minnesota clubhouse afterward. No one flipped the postgame spread. No one angrily stared into the depths of his locker. Music played -- albeit quietly -- on the stereo as players packed their bags for the flight back to Minneapolis. (Curiously, there were no tunes in the victorious Oakland clubhouse.)
How could a team take a 9-1 drubbing so well? Because the Twins could treat Game 2 the way a quarterback treats a play when he knows the defense has jumped offsides -- it's essentially a free down. By winning Game 1, Minnesota had guaranteed itself at least a split on the road, the holy grail of teams without home field advantage in a short series. Steal a win in the other team's park, conventional wisdom goes, and enjoy the flight back to your home turf for Games 3 and 4. "When I came out of the game in the eighth inning I felt OK," Twins center fielder Torii Hunter said after Wednesday's contest. "It's one game. What we wanted was a split."
The Angels said similar things in New York after surviving the Yankees in Game 2. There's one problem with that thinking, however. Historically, splitting Games 1 and 2 on the road hasn't worked out too well for the away team. Coming into this year, 10 of the 28 Division Series since 1995 have been tied after two games. The road team that "won the split" ended up taking only four of those series. (A fifth, the 1997 Indians, went on to the ALCS, but they had the advantage of playing Games 3, 4 and 5 at home. The current 2-2-1 schedule was adopted the following year.)
What does all this mean as we look ahead to Game 3 Friday in the A's-Twins and Angels-Yankees series, both of which are tied, 1-1? Only the obvious: The underdog Twins and Angels still have their work cut out for them. First of all, they'd better take care of business at the Metrodome and Edison Field, respectively. Only one of the aforementioned 10 teams, the 2000 Yankees, has won its series on the road after splitting Games 3 and 4 at home. Here's what Anaheim and Minnesota will have to do to set up -- cover your ears, Fox network executives -- a Twins-Angels ALCS.
Angels: Friday's starter, Ramon Ortiz, has to figure out a way to keep the Yankees in the yard, no easy task for a pitcher who surrendered the most home runs (40) in the majors this year. The David Wells-John Lackey pitching matchup in Game 4 favors New York, so beating Mike Mussina in Game 3 might be the Angels' best hope of staying in the series.
Twins: To pull this out they still have to prove they can hit left-handed pitching, either by beating 23-game winner Barry Zito Friday or Mark Mulder in Game 5 on Sunday. Yes, Minnesota lit up soft-throwing Ted Lilly in Game 1. But here's what the Twins have managed in 27 plate appearances against the other two lefties they've faced, Mulder and reliever Ricardo Rincon: five hits, just one for extra bases (Cristian Guzman's solo homer off Mulder), and one run. Minnesota's left-handed hitters were 1 for 13 against Mulder and Rincon.
The Twins also need to start running. They didn't attempt a stolen base in the first two games, and the early deficits they fell into both days kept them from using the hit and run. Minnesota's defense (four errors and a handful of uncredited miscues) has also broken down. "I don't think we've played the type of baseball we played during the regular season," Hunter said. The Twins were lucky to steal Game 1, but they can't continue down that same path.
Sports Illustrated staff writer Stephen Cannella covers the baseball beat for the magazine. Check back regularly for his dispatches from the 2002 playoffs.
|