|
Uncertain future No obvious successor in line for IOC presidencyPosted: Saturday February 27, 1999 05:14 PM
LONDON (AP) -- With the Olympics mired in crisis, IOC president Juan Antonio Samaranch appears more determined than ever to stay in office. But the questions remain: Can he hold on? For how long? Who might succeed him? The answers to all three are anyone's guess. As the International Olympic Committee prepares for a watershed meeting March 17-18 to deal with its worst corruption scandal, no obvious successor to Samaranch has emerged from among a half-dozen leading candidates. Samaranch has come under tremendous pressure since the scandal broke late last year over cash and other inducements received by IOC members from Salt Lake City and other Olympic bidders. Calls for his resignation have mounted.
Recent interviews with a cross section of IOC members elicited the same general response: Samaranch is the only one who can lead the committee out of the crisis and he should see through his final term until 2001. With no obvious successor in place, Olympic officials say Samaranch's departure could trigger a vicious internal battle that would only drag the IOC deeper into crisis. "This is not the time to be debating your leadership," said Australian executive board member Kevan Gosper. "It's the time to rally around your leadership. If the ship's in a storm, you don't throw the captain overboard." Samaranch received a rousing endorsement this week from NBC sports chief Dick Ebersol, whose network is paying $3.5 billion for U.S. television rights to five Olympics through 2008. "I think it would be crazy" for Samaranch to leave, Ebersol said in an Australian TV interview. "Since 1980, he brought so many positive things to the [Olympic] movement. ... And he was totally responsible for creating the vast business success that they've had. On top of that, he is a man of incredible personal integrity." At the IOC's marble headquarters in Lausanne, Switzerland, a sort of siege mentality has set in. Samaranch has stopped doing interviews and made no public appearances or statements in recent weeks. But Samaranch has kept busy, conferring with his aides and IOC members, laying the groundwork for the March session, the most crucial meeting in his 19 years as president. Aides say Samaranch, who appeared tired and disheartened a month ago, is more upbeat and more determined to fight on and save his legacy. The outcome of the March meeting should help determine Samaranch's fate. If the IOC fails to expel members and push through major reforms, Samaranch's position will become untenable. Even if Samaranch comes out stronger and the crisis dies down, his future remains a matter of conjecture. There is speculation he might decide to step down in calmer circumstances before the end of his term, possibly after next year's Sydney Olympics. The timing of any early departure is crucial and could be part of the reckoning to determine a successor. Under the Olympic Charter, if the IOC president leaves before the end of his mandate, the first vice president -- there are four VPs -- takes over until an election at the next general assembly. So, if Samaranch were to resign in March, Pal Schmitt of Hungary would step in as president, pending an election at the IOC session in June. If Samaranch waited until June, Schmitt's VP term will have expired by then, and Canada's Dick Pound would take control. In 2000, Anita DeFrantz of the United States would be next in line. Regardless of whether Samaranch makes it to the end of his term, there is no obvious long-term heir. Leading contenders are executive board members Pound, Gosper, DeFrantz, Jacques Rogge of Belgium and Thomas Bach of Germany. South Korean board member Kim Un-yong was a serious presidential hopeful but he is among those under investigation in the Salt Lake scandal. Even if Kim escapes without expulsion, his chances have been severely hurt, if not killed. Pound, who has been the IOC's chief negotiator of TV and sponsorship deals, has been put in a difficult position as head of the commission investigating ethical misconduct of members in the Salt Lake case. While some feel Pound's stock has risen, several members say his presidential chances have been compromised. By giving Pound the high-profile job of prosecuting IOC members, Samaranch may have -- wittingly or unwittingly -- ruined his ambitions. Gosper, head of the IOC's press commission, has become increasingly active as Australia prepares to stage the 2000 Games, but his age -- 65, nine years older than Pound -- is a disadvantage. DeFrantz, the first woman to reach the IOC vice presidency, is a prominent advocate for athletes' rights and the advancement of women. But some members believe it's too early for DeFrantz, only 46, to be considered a serious candidate. In a strong position is Rogge, an orthopedic surgeon who has made a rapid rise to the IOC's inner circle. Rogge holds influential roles as head of the European Olympic Committees, and as the IOC's point man for the Sydney Olympics and the 2004 Athens Games. Another name mentioned in IOC circles is Jean-Claude Killy, the French skier who won three gold medals at the 1968 Grenoble Games. Killy, an IOC member since 1995, has not been a major player. But he's a favorite of Samaranch, has name recognition and has not been dragged into the scandal or internal politics. Whether he has the desire to be president is unclear. The name of Britain's Princess Anne also has come up. Robert Helmick, the former IOC member from the United States who resigned in 1991 amid conflict-of-interest allegations, suggested in a newspaper column that she should take charge as "interim administrator." Anne, an IOC member since 1988, has been held up as an example of unimpeachable integrity for refusing gifts from bid cities. But her royal duties leave her little spare time for the IOC (she will miss the March session due to previous commitments). "I don't believe right now there's anyone who is clearly ready to take [Samaranch's] place," Ebersol said. "Hopefully, the meeting in March will be a success and over the next two years they'll be doubly diligent, and by the time they vote in 2001, there'll be someone clearly ready to succeed Samaranch's position."
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 1999 CNN/SI. A Time Warner Company. Terms under which this service is provided to you.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||