|
Commentary, news, analysis and reader-driven discussions focusing on this year's Stanley Cup playoffs.
At least he hopes so. Down 2-0 and heading to Madison Square Garden for a pair doesn't leave him much room for error. Despite playing reasonably well in the opener, the Thrashers were sunk by the skittish play of Lehtonen, who looked every bit the nervous playoff debutante. Despite that shaky showing, Hartley's decision to come back with Hedberg in Game 2 was a calculated risk. The veteran had started just 16 games this season, and even though he'd stymied the Rangers with a 38-save performance back on March 16, this was a must-win for Atlanta. It almost worked, too, but his failure to knot up the series was no reflection on Hedberg's play. He battled all the way and was at times spectacular in stopping 37 Ranger shots, stoning Jed Ortmeyer and Sean Avery on breakaways and denying a screen shot by Jaromir Jagr and a rebound drive by Brendan Shanahan midway through the second just as a Rangers' power play expired. The two that eluded him -- Avery's crazy carom off the glass and Shanahan's one-timer from the slot -- would have found the back of the net behind any goalie. So he's earned another shot. Of course, a decision to proceed with Hedberg is not without complication. Lehtonen is, after all, the future of the franchise. For the team to reach its long-term championship aspirations, he needs to learn how to win in the postseason. And the only way he'll do that is with experience ... even if it is painful in the short term. But after waiting this long just to make the playoffs -- after mortgaging so much of their future for this run -- can the Thrashers really afford to see it all end in four games? That's a realistic possibility the way Henrik Lundqvist is playing at the other end of the ice. Of course, if Atlanta's forwards don't start generating some quality chances, especially on the impotent power play where they went 0-6 on Saturday, it won't matter if Phil Myre and Daniel Bouchard both are between the pipes on Tuesday night. So damn the future. The Thrashers have to win now, and Hedberg gives them their best chance to do it.
posted by SI.com | View comments |
Comments:If the thrashers do somehow miraculously win this series, it will exactly mirror the cup winner Canes' first round victory over montreal last year- they lost the first two games at home, made a goaltender switch early in game 2, and then won the next 4 games, three of which were in montreal.
However, it is very unlikely cause the Rangers are on a roll and the Thrashers would have to win at least two on the road to win the series. Johan Hedberg is a proven playoff goalie. In 2001, He led the Penguins to the Eastern Conference Final for a team that had such studs on Defense named: Laukanan, Hans Jonnson, and Joe Melichar. That being said the Thrashers aren't going anywhere and sadly the loser of the Sens/Pens will be out while the Rangers will be in the 2nd round.
It will be interesting to see what Hartley does with back-to-back games Tuesday and Wednesday. Hedberg definitely made a strong case on Saturday to get the start Tuesday. His play in game 3 will dictate Hartley's decision for Wednesday. Bob traditionally likes to ride the hot hand.
Bigger issues are for his defense to limit the opportunities for the Rangers and for something to ignite the offense, especially the PP. In on of their late PPs, the Thrashers actually used motion to get some looks (what a shock!), as compared to their usual method of standing in the set positions and hoping the defense falters. BTW, nice reference to Myre and Bouchard for us old Flames fans. Hedberg might be good enough to win this series but not the cup. You have to go with the guy whose top game is better and that is the young guy.
Can someone explain how the NHL allowed two series to have back-to-back games scheduled? NYR and Atlanta have two in one series and Detroit/Calgary have one. You are telling me that the NHL is in such bad shape that they will allow a game 6 and 7 to be played on back to back nights. Talk about killing a teams chance in the next round. Will this continue?
"moooooooooooooose"
First, fix the glass at Philips Arena! This sort of bounce has been happening all year, now its cost our team!
What the Thrashers really need is a pre-game Lehtonen and Kovalchuk meter. It would be nice to know beforehand if those two are going to show up on any particular night. Both are spectacular when on, disastrous when not. To be fair, Kovi ended up only -2 on the season, not too bad. Lehtonen however just has too many bad games, and he doesn't bounce back quickly enough. Hedberg is much steadier, perhaps the trick in the long run is to start Lehtonen, but be quick to yank him if he shows signs of imploding. But for now, its gotta be Hedberg, he played great in game 2. It doesn't matter who is in goal for the Thrashers. If their big guns continue to be invisible, i.e. Hossa, Kozlov and to some degree Tkacuk, they will lose. Lehtonen did look shaky in the first game, but he really only let in one bad goal, but on that goal, there were 2 miscues before Lehtonen let the goal in. Hossa is the biggest disappointment. He continues to live up to his playoff no-show reputation.
Hartley seems to think that the Thrashers can intimidate the Rangers with a lot of physical play. These tactics have taken Atlanta out of their game. Meanwhile, New York has taken its coach's admonitions to heart by consistently turning the other cheek. The Rangers defense is fairly inexperienced and has had some trouble clearing the zone but with all the Atlanta forwards crashing the net, Lundqvist kicks shots out past them to Ranger forwards who proceed to counter-attack. The coaching match-up has clearly favored New York and will probably continue as the series progresses.
Anyone know how i can watch the Rangers game? I am located in NYC and I cant find it on the tv. What the hell--TSN? What channel is that?
The better question is Whether Kovalchuk will play without his Diaper for the remainder of the series?
There is nothing the thrashers can do. You can't beat the Rangers. Bring on Buffalo
I'm a Ranger fan, but I'll try to be fair here. I would go with Hedberg for game three. He made a few great stops and, as you said, he was strong against NYR in the regular season. If he lets in even one soft goal, or looks out of position, and the Rangers win, then go back to Lehtonen in game 4. That might sound skittish, but you need the best player to get in, even if you switch mid-game. When your back's against the wall, you have to dump whatever's not working.
|
Recent Posts
|
||||