|
Commentary, news, analysis and reader-driven discussions focusing on this year's Stanley Cup playoffs.
In the latest example of how difficult it is for a one-line team to win the Stanley Cup, the Anaheim Ducks' checking line wrapped up Jason Spezza's scoring line for the second straight game, giving the Ottawa Senators their second consecutive loss for the first time in 63 games. Of course, those other five-plus months of games are ancient history. No Floridas or Bostons now for Ottawa. The Senators, who roared through three rounds, skated better than they did in the opener, pushed back more when the Ducks forecheckers pounded them, but they have yet to demonstrate the conviction necessary against physically dominant Anaheim, whose pair of one-goal wins does not begin to express how tilted the ice has seemed in its favor. The playoffs are usually more layered in their complexity, more nuanced, but Anaheim vs. Ottawa has neatly spun on the axis of a single matchup: the Ducks' checkers against the line of Spezza, Dany Heatley and Daniel Alfredsson. (Spare me the arguments about Ottawa's depth: those three players have scored 23 of the Senators' 50 playoff goals.) Through two games, the Anaheim shutdown line has two goals and is a plus-6 while Spezza's line has no goals, is a minus-6 and has spent about as much time at even-strength in the offensive zone as Britney Spears spends in a library. The checkers were supposed to hold Ottawa's Big Three to a standstill, not turn them into spectators as the red light keeps going on. In Game 1, a Saskatchewan farm boy named Travis Moen, who is playing hooky from spraying crops to play for the most esteemed piece of hockey hardware, scored the winning goal with about three minutes left while going head-to-head with Ottawa's big boys. On Wednesday night, Moen's center, Samuel Pahlsson, scored with 5:44 remaining to give the Ducks a 1-0 victory, spoiling a nearly immaculate performance by goalie Ray Emery. "Making them work inside the puck and making them play defense," Anaheim defenseman Chris Pronger said. "That's the best way to counteract offensive players." "Their defensemen and their checkers have been the stars of the series," said Ottawa coach Bryan Murray, whose top three players were without a point for just the second time in 17 playoff games. The scoring woes for the Senators, who periodically spotted Alfredsson on Mike Fisher's right flank but generally kept their top three offensive players together against Pahlsson, Moen, Rob Niedermayer, Pronger and defenseman Scott Niedermayer, were compounded by the lackadaisical defensive play on the winning goal. In an effort to create at least a modicum of offense -- and since sparkling during an extended 5-on-3 power play in the first period, Ducks goalie Jean-Sébastien Giguère could have turned in his skates for a pair of slippers -- Heatley made a poor chip just inside the offensive blue line. Pahlsson snapped it up and broke down the right side, a play which, as it progressed through the neutral zone, appeared to be relatively harmless. Alfredsson seemed to have a chance to check Pahlsson just as he gained the Ottawa blue line but couldn't poke the puck away from him, in effect turning the rushing center over to defenseman Joe Corvo. Pahlsson then cut inside, twirling Corvo a full 180 degrees so the defenseman actually faced the net. He then used Corvo as a screen, firing the puck from the right faceoff circle through Corvo's legs and past Emery, just inside the far post. Pahlsson also won 10 of 12 faceoffs, delivered four hits, blocked a shot and probably recorded a CD with Snoop Dog, who was in the stands decked out in a Ducks jersey, during the second intermission. "In the playoffs, everybody steps up the defensive aspect of the game at least 20 to 25 percent," Ducks coach Randy Carlyle said. "It's nice to see these three players are getting rewarded for all the hard work. The one thing about those guys, they play the tough minutes and a lot of time the spotlight has not been directed towards them. Right now they're earning that." Despite general manager Brian Burke's musings that the preternaturally tough Pahlsson must have some Albertan in him, Pahlsson went to high school in perhaps the greatest hockey city -- per capita, at least -- in the world. The city of Ornskoldsvik, a seaport of about 60,000 halfway between Stockholm and the Arctic Circle on the Gulf of Bothnia, has produced Peter Forsberg, Markus Naslund, Daniel and Henrik Sedin and lesser luminaries currently in the NHL. When Boston nabbed him from Colorado in the trade for Hall of Famer Raymond Bourque prior to the deadline in 2000, Pahlsson figured to be a second-line center, a steady point producer. It never quite worked out that way. He still plays more of a two-way game with the Swedish national team, but Carlyle prefers him in a shutdown role. The goal was just Pahlsson's third of the playoffs, but his second game-winner and the fifth by his line in the 14 Anaheim playoff victories. Anaheim is unbeaten in five home games, largely because Carlyle has been able to get Pahlsson's line -- the only trio he has not fiddled with since the start of the regular season -- against various No. 1 lines. With the series shifting to Ottawa for Game 3 Saturday, the matchups become more problematic for Carlyle, who will no longer have the last change. But if the Anaheim bench is alert, the Ducks should be changing often on the fly, again putting Murray in a position where he has to find a way to counter. The Big Three on a match has been bad news for Ottawa.
posted by SI.com | View comments |
Comments:Great article!
Giving the formerly "unheralded" checking-line of Pahlsson, Moen, and the other Niedermayer, their due props. These gentleman have great chemistry and will do what it takes to get the job done. Yes ... (to the ignorant reporters that still mis-identify them) ... they are the Third-Line ... not the fourth. Go Ducks! Wow Farber, you might very well be the first journalist outside of California to recognize how dominant the Ducks have been in this series. In Ottawa, they're saying the better team lost both games...
wow, only two comments so far.
Hockey is alive and well. And go Ducks. This Ducks team compares with the great squads of the Terry Yake/Lonnie Loach era. Sens are only one game from turning this thing around...and that game is coming up in a few days
I agree. However you did forget to mention Giguere's performance. He played a huge role is helping to stop that big line for Ottawa.
these ducks have just dominated from the beginning. here in ottawa, all they have to say are complaints about officiating (clutching and grabbing) but the sens have to learn to play around that. one complaining about it does not make the refs take notice and change the way they officiate a game. man up, sens fans, and be willing to admit that your team has been badly outplayed monday and wednesday! it's embarrassing for me to live in a city of whiners.
Farber is a wonderful hockey writer. I knew him when he was a baseball writer, and he was great at that too.
Nobody that I know in Ottawa is pretending that the better team lost those first two games. We know better. And we weren't better. Ottawa may come back. But whether or not they do, that's one fine team they're playing. Lets not forget that the Ducks should be thrilled to be where they are.... Californians who support hockey (all 6 of them) think the ducks won by 5 goals in each contest.
This could very easily be 0-2 in favor of Ottawa. Be careful ducks... you better win one of the next 2 or you boys will be done. The Ducks have definitely outplayed the Senators. And I am a Canadian stating this. The Ducks have been by far more aggressive, and they have taken advantage of having the last change due to home ice advantage, and matched up well against the Sens lines.
Well deserved thus far. It will be interesting to see how they fair in Ottawa. it's been funny to hear all this talk about how great a team Ottawa is/was etc. As a Canadian there seems to be some sort of expectation that we (canadians) are supposed to cheer for the "canadian" team, No before the playoffs started i picked Anaheim and lo and behold they are 2 wins away from hoisting the cup. okay i admit i'm from Toronto and my bloodline means by birth Ottawa is a sworn enemy but still Anaheim was the most complete team heading into the playoffs and i'm even shocked Ottawa made it past NJ!
Agreed! I was surprised to see Ottawa get passed NJ. But I was also surprised to see Detroit get past San Jose. Over rated teams can step it up the deeper they get into the playoffs for sure.
Great. My local team, the Ducks, are up 2-0. Too bad that I didn't get to see either game. Not only is the NHL in such disarray as to give the first 2 games to "Versus", but there was no radio play either!!! NHL, can you make some common sense changes? And I don't want to hear whining about this being ESPN's fault.
Isn't it Snoop Dogg with two g's? Other than that great article. As an anti-Senators fan (Sabres fan) I am very pleased with how well the Ducks are handling this series.
Good to see a checking line getting due props, especially for how dominant they have been. I liked how Pahlsson did not even know that puck had gone into the net, until a couple of seconds went by. His goal even surprised him. GO DUCKS!!!
By the way, where are the reports from Duck-Hater Allan Muir, that Wanker. I am still waiting to read his stories how the Ducks are not the best team, just the winning team. I'm not the biggest Anaheim fan, but I will say that team was assembled to win from their acquisitions and development of young players. They went to the Cup finals a few years back against NJ, and went to the Conference finals last year. I'd say that shows a commitment to fielding a winning team. Ottawa has their work cut out for them, and if their top line can get it together they'll post some goals in a hurry. That'll make for a great series, and should tide me over until September when they start up again.
As for the smart aleck "6 California fans" clown, yeah, we Californians can get distracted as spectators. But with 15 professional sports teams, countless minor league teams in all sports, major tour stops in almost every other sport on the planet, miles of beaches, mountains reaching over 14,000 feet and deserts reaching 120 degrees in the shade. Add all of this to 80 degree weather that regularly appears as early as February, it's easy to see why we get distracted. But hey, if you look at it this way, this State does have 3 NHL teams like a "hockey proper" State like NY does (OK, 4 if you count the NJ Devils across the river). Your post shows that you are well travelled, and obviously have been to all four corners of the State researching the "State of hockey" in California. I can see how your experiences would lead to your opinion that California is so "un hockey" it's blasphemous for the "expansion Ducks" to even be on the ice with the Senators (who also are an expansion, or at least reconstituted, team). I'll counter by saying despite all the other stuff going on, hockey is doing pretty well here. So root for your team and stop pouting, it's really, really sad to see. It's no surprise to me the Ducks have dominated thus far... too much credit has been given to Ottawa for they way they breezed through their first three rounds to the Cup finals. Make no mistake, Ottawa has played great, but they played against an inexperienced Pittsburgh team and (psychologically) shaky NJ and Buffalo teams, despite that NJ and Buffalo were ranked higher.
Anaheim is unlike anything else they've faced thus far, and the Senators have been thrown far off-balance. I don't see them regaining form at this point, either. This is Anaheim's time. Ducks in 5. Any hockey fan who thinks the better team lost needs to look at the Shots On Goal. The ducks shoot pucks. This looks like the Sens Sabs series in reverse. I am a Buffalo fan and did not get caught up in the "better team" philosphy. I was very worried about the Sens from the start. In the end it doesn't matter how many stars you have on the bench, execution wins! The Sens out skated and out hit Buffalo. Now the roles are reversed. The Ducks are built to win the cup. The Senators are going to have respond in kind if they want Stanley. Brian Murray has to be sorry he did such great work. What a bummer. I say Ducks in 5 maybe 6.
Ottawa has been outplayed in both games (well only the 3rd in the first game but thats all that really counts)and anyone who can't see that is A. an idiot. B. a Sens fan who can't face reality. I'm a sens fan who completely has to give it to Anaheim for compleetely shutting down the top line which is causing the Sens to make mistakes. I hope for the love of God the Sens can turn it around and make a series of it. Going back home they can't lose...and not because they are invincible at home but I mean they CAN'T...Ottawa will implode in on itself...or everyone will call them choke artists all over again and either way it'd be a terrible time for me to go back there. GO SENS GO!
Okay, I've put up with this junk about So Cal not having any hockey fans for a long time, but really, wake up. The Ducks have had great attendance since Day 1; the Kings, for some reason, still have a huge fan base, and I personally know about 50 die-hard fans. It's just that when you look at So Cal and see one hockey fan for every 99 non-fans, it looks bad. But remember, there are about 10 million people here, so overall, we have as many hockey fans as Ottawa, Calgary, Vancouver, New York, etc. Also remember that everybody here is from somewhere else, usually somewhere that had hockey.
What we don't have is any decent hockey press. You have to dig down to page 8 or 9 of the sports section to find out what the Ducks did last night, and forget about seeing any of it on the local TV stations. It's the So Cal press that are the bandwagon-jumpers, not the fans. We've been there all along. My response to the "better team" arguments is always: the better team WINS. Period. You might be able to blame a bad period or even a bad game on bad luck, unfortunate bounces, poor officiating, whatever. Not two games. After a point, the better team needs to rise above. So far, Ottawa has not done that.
In each of the past two games, Anaheim has been the better team. As a defense-o-phile, I am loving the fact that it is the Ducks' CHECKING line that is winning games for them right now. Though it was checkers Moen and Pahlsson who scored both game-winning goals, their most important contributions have been in their defense. That blocked shot at the end of Game 2 (was it Moen? Beauchemin? I can't remember) was the epitome of what it takes. Compare that to Spezza's lame excuse for defense and puckhandling and you see why Anaheim is up 2-0. The Ducks are going to sweep this thing or take it in 5. I watched helplessly as the Ducks dismantled my favorite team in the first round - Minnesota. Our squad was hot heading into the playoffs - hopes were high. The Ducks crushed us. They proceeded to do the same to two more very good teams. Playing Ottawa is easy for the Ducks because the Western Conference is just way better than the East. A few things I've noticed that seem to go unsaid about the Ducks team: 1-they have a lot of speed. maybe they are not as "skilled" as the Sens and Wings but they are faster up and down their entire roster. 2-they move their feet constantly--this team skates hard - especially on the back-check. 3-team discipline is outstanding. this team never panics and always plays within their system. This team is, indeed a TEAM. well coached, disciplined and fast as well as physical.
Amir posts that the Sens are one game away from turning it around. Well, they are more likely one game away from certain destruction. I'd give the Sens one game at home the other to the Ducks and then we wrap it up on home ice in Anaheim. GO DUCKS!
This is in response to a post that stated lack of hockey fans in California or So Cal. This can't be farthest from the truth. Yes, hockey is not the most popular sport in So Cal due to unlimited activities one can find in So Cal, but hockey fans are abundant starting with kids spending countless hours in the ice rink. If there was only "6 hockey fans" in CA, how was it that the Ducks have been able to sell out for over 30 games in a row. It's gotten to the point that I, die hard hockey fan, can't find tickets to the game and have to resort to catching the games on TV or radio.
As far as the Stanley Cup finals go, the better team has won both games. The Ducks have completely dominated in every statistics, including the most important goals. Yes, they have been playing at home and were able to get their lines to match up, but don't expect that to change when the games shift to Ottawa. It will be more difficult, but the Ducks will step up to the challenge and come away with at least one game to close out the series at home in front of their "6 hockey fans". I was on record (you could look it up..wink) with friends and family that the Ducks had a very good chance of sweeping the Sens before the series started. The matchups just don't work in the Senator's favour. I also think that guys like Spezza and Alfie get overconfident too easily. You can hear it in their comments especially after losses. They are a one line team and if they aren't going, they don't win. The problem is they can be physically intimidated and only rarely respond in kind. Alfie in particular is capable of playing the physical game but you don't see it on a consistent basis.
The Sens have a good to great D and althought I don't like Emery's lack of rebound control, he has shone in both games. Really, they should have been down 4-0 in Game 2 if he hadn't been so sharp. The Ducks have all the ingredients to win the Cup.Goaltending, physical & skilled defensemen. youthfull talent (Getzlaf and Perry), the premier checking line in hockey, and they are also perhaps the best team along the boards in the NHL as well. Not a bad resume. The Sens just don't have that extra desire and "push" to take it to another level and accept the challenge. I don't see them coming back in this series but they have had a fine season. It's really starting to look like the West had the 3 or 4 best teams in the league and that the East was overrated. I know I enjoyed the Western conference games with Vancouver, San Jose, Anaheim, Minnesota and Calgary a lot this year. Nice Write-up!
Perhaps the LA TIMES should pick this one up and bury it on page 12. The OC Register routinely places the Ducks on the front page of either the Paper or the Sports Section. For my 50 cents, the Queens can keep the Times. The Ducks have the Register. As for the "6 Fans"... is this a reference to the "Original 6" teams? "What? Is that a SoCal native that knows what the Original 6 are?" YEAH! I think I counted 7 posts before me from SoCal fans. So I'm #8! C'Mon SoCal Fans! Ring in.....Let's let the Hockey world know how many of us are here. Go Ducks! Ducks in 5! (hehe, I have tiks to game 5) I want to echo the comment posted by RandyV with regard to the Hockey Press. We don't have one. An NBA player whining (since when did that become news?) has wholly consummed their attention. And even here the Press has missed the real story - the Laker's star (I'm so sick of hearing and seeing his name, I won't acknowledge it) has essentially told his team mates they aren't good enough to play with him. Wonder how they feel about that.
Thank God we have hockey! There are plenty of fans out here who truly enjoy the game, even if the local media doesn't. It is the story of West versus East. Really, who in the eastern conference could have had a chance to win against the big Western conference teams? NYR maybe.
The article by Michael Farber is excellent and expose my thoughts. On Pahlsson goal, take a close look at Alfie. A faster and motivated skater could have reach Pahlsson with a forecheck. Alfie looked tired or depressed and kind of gave up....(see the word by Farber (lack.......)in his article! Still I am amazed at the poor TV rating Hockey has in US. I'm one of the few to get VS on Dish because we have literally everything, but a lot of people including many of my neighbors don't. They will be watching the game saturday though. The "Checking" line has been a dominant force throughout the playoffs, and I am more than happy to see them get some good recognition. My Ducks were built for this series, and the new owners were willing to make it so. My biggest worry is losing Giguere next year to FA, though Ilya has done a pretty fine job when needed.
I will say that the comments I've seen from the Sens fans have been much civil than some of the Redwings blogs I followed for that series. Good luck, and good game. Ducks fan from Anaheim (eg, I can watch the disneyland fireworks nightly from my front window) I've been saying it all playoffs, if Anaheim wins the Cup Pahlsonn gets the Conn Smythe. Pahlsonn, Moen, and Rob Niedermeyer are the lynchpin of this Ducks team, they outplayed Gaborik/Demitra against the Wild, amd the Sedin twins, and Zetterberg/Datsyuk and forced the Canucks and Red Wings to actually split up their top lines.
Brian Murray ought to try getting Chris Neil and co. out there against that checking line whenever he can. Line match for the checkers. Anaheim has other good lines, but that line is the critical one, you look at the Vancouver series where the last four games were decided by one goal. Moen had an OT winner and Rob Niedermeyer created another one with a hit, Brad May was also huge. Those are the guys you need to focus on to beat Anaheim. The ducks are playing a great style of hockey, in which they have been playing all year, aggressively and unrelenting. Many other teams whom make it to the playoffs seem to alter their play, and play more conservatively. This is why the ducks are winning, they don't know any other way to play. Keep doing what you're doing ducks, and we'll see you raise the cup in Game 5. GO DUCKS!!!
|
Recent Posts
|
||||