Extra MustardSI On CampusFantasyPhoto GalleriesSwimsuitVideoFanNationSI KidsTNT
Drop the gloves during the playoffs with SI.com's writers in the NHL Cup Blog, a daily journal of hockey commentary, on-site reporting and reader-driven discussions.
12:00 AM ET, 6/08/06

Oilers' woes more than goaltending

Posted by Michael Farber
There are all kinds of formulas for winning the Stanley Cup, but using all three goaltenders on your roster in the first two games probably isn't one of them.

Faced with a choice that was goaltending equivalent of Tastes Great or Less Filling after losing starter Dwayne Roloson for the series late in Game 1 -- either Ty Conklin or Jussi Markkanen, both with egregious .880 save percentages during the regular season -- Edmonton Oilers coach Craig MacTavish decided on Less Filling, the sometimes feckless Finn. After being lit up for five in Game 2 of the final by the determined Carolina Hurricanes, Markkanen might be known as More Filling. At least that's what the Hurricanes were doing to the net.

And the startling thing on a night when the Oilers didn't merely lose but started running around like a fourth graders at recess is that Markkanen fit right in -- no better or worse than the team in front of him.

Indeed, MacTavish could have used both Markkanen and Conklin in net at the same time. It hardly would have mattered.

"I thought [Markkanen] played well," said Oilers winger Ryan Smyth. "He kept us in the game early. For a guy who hasn't played in a while" -- Markkanen last played March 1 but hadn't won since Jan. 25 -- "he did well. No need to put the blame on him."

Fair enough. Sure, his save percentage for his first playoff start wound up as .808 -- five goals on 26 shots in the 5-0 rout -- but he was as much the victim as he was victimized by a team that simply melted. After some promising moments in the first period, when the determined Hurricanes were forced to block 11 shots, the Oilers simply never were in the game. They played river hockey for the first eight minutes, allowing three two-on-ones, the puck finding the net when Andrew Ladd banked one in off Edmonton defenseman Marc-Andre Bergeron, who is killing his goalies. (Remember it was Bergeron who shoved Ladd into Roloson with fewer than six minutes remaining in the third period of Game 1 and knocking the goalie out with a knee in jury, which ultimately put the Oilers in this predicament. If Carolina wins, Bergeron might get an extra playoff share.)

They could not stay out of the penalty box and when they were on the penalty kill, they could not maintain the integrity of their four-man box, allowing Carolina three power play goals in 10 opportunities. As MacTavish noted, there were some truly quirky bounces on the Carolina goals, but Markkanen left some greasy rebounds, failing to corral Nic Wallin's shot that eventually led to Cory Stillman flipping in the puck with a few seconds left in the second period, a goal that seemed to crush the Oilers' spirit and wreck their discipline.

"I thought we were being too impatient," Oilers center Michael Peca said. "We got caught in the river game they like to play, and that opens us up to being vulnerable. They took advantage of that. The last thing you need to do is to continue to give a team the opportunity to score on a guy who hasn't played in four months."

Now there is nowhere for MacTavish to go, other than to Edmonton for Game 3 Saturday. He is committed to Markkanen for the rest of the series, hoping that the goalie's confidence level -- one reason he chose Markkanen over Conklin, who made the puck-handling gaffe that resulted in Carolina's last-minute winner in Game 1 -- improves. If Markkanen's indifferent play were a question of nerves, MacTavish suggested, it would have been evidenced in the way he handled the puck. He didn't handle it badly. And he certainly swept it out of his net with aplomb.

If Edmonton is going to rebound in this series, it has to make the goaltender irrelevant. The Oilers need to bubblewrap Markkanen, get in even more shooting lanes to block shots, play the way they did when their pre-Roloson netminding was left to the shaky troika of Markkanen, Conklin and Mike Morrison (traded at the deadline to Ottawa). The Oilers have to avoid penalties, bang the Carolina defense on the forecheck, tighten up in the neutral zone.

MacTavish has a terrific selling job in the next 72 hours, getting his team to ignore that it has been outscored 10-1 in the series since late in the second period of Game 1 and that its injured bulwark goalie, now cleanly shorn, his playoff beard as much as a memory as his generally solid postseason play, has yielded to a backup goalie who was one reason eighth-seeded Oilers scuffled just to get into the playoffs.

If you're an Oilers fan, it's enough to make you cry into your (lite) beer.

Comments:

Posted: 12:40 AM   by Anonymous
I really don't think Markkanen was all bad tonight. Was he good? no, but his defense and offense weren't much help to him. If your offense can't score, all the goals against don't matter. The Oilers need to play the way they played in the 1st and 2nd periods of game 1. And they need to solve Ward again (hint blocker side high). If they cant do this, it doesn't matter who's in net.
Posted: 12:44 AM   by Anonymous
Markkanen played like a goalie who hasn't played in 3 months. The second goal was a weak shot through his legs and the third goal he was laying on his back. I bet NBC is glad they get the next 2 games. OLN got out just in time

Captain Tom
Posted: 1:18 AM   by Anonymous
I'm sorry but without rollie, this going to be a cakewalk for Carolina and I am not even a Carolina Fan.

This series is already over and probably not worth watching. I was going for Edmonton to win this but the string of luck with injuries that Carolina has capitalized on will carry them to the cup.

Its a shame but oh well.
Posted: 9:19 AM   by Anonymous
Too much talk centers around how the Oilers are playing. What about the Hurricanes? They did exactly what they said they needed to do after Game 1, that is, play more disciplined hockey, skate better and play better defense. They did all three and flattened the Oilers in just less than 2 periods.

You can blame the Oiler netminder all you like, but let's look at how many goals Edmonton put into the net themselves: zero. There's the tale of the tape, right there, plain as day.

You don't win any games in the playoffs that you do not score. It may be that the 8th seed is finally playing like an 8th seed and it may come to pass that this is a short series.
Posted: 9:24 AM   by Anonymous
Man, it sounds like people are saying that if I could ice skate, I could be a Hurricane and win the Stanley Cup by sheer luck because of the opposing teams' injuries.
Do you know how ridiculous that is? Injuries weaken a team, but neither team would be there without serious skill and talent.
Please stop harping on the injuries.
Posted: 9:58 AM   by Anonymous
Cut Markkanen some slack, his team hung him out to dry with the worst defensive play I've seen from the Oilers since the Detroit series. It doesn't help when guys like Steve Staios are trying to go end to end and deke through Carolina's blueline (he predictably coughed up the puck which led to a goal).
Not that it matters if Ward doesn't cool off.
"If Edmonton is going to rebound in this series, it has to make the goaltender irrelevant."

Absolutely right, dead on. Edmonton has to play in Carolina's end to win. Carolina has become very patient about getting the puck out of their end, however. During the Buffalo series they seemed to find a groove where they would avoid taking chances on taking penalties along the boards, thus allowing the Sabres to hold the puck in for pretty long periods of time. Carolina concentrates more on not allowing the open shot or passing lane than on clearing the puck -- clearing the puck will eventually result from that approach.

I guess that confidence in the goaltender allows this. I don't know how the Oilers are going to get Ward off his game at this point.
Posted: 11:11 AM   by Simpsonite
Cry into our lite beer? No, no, no! Canadians and Edmontonians don't drink lite beer...we drink real beer, especially in Edmonton. Mmmmmm beer...don't count the Oil out yet, Carolina has never played in Edmonton. This place is nuts cause everybody is drunk on the powerful stuff...
Posted: 11:20 AM   by Anonymous
Makkanen wasnt terrible last night. The only goal that was his fault was really the second one that trickled through his legs. The first was a delfection, the third should have been cleared by one of the defensemen, and the fourth and fifth were also deflections. Ripping the goaltending on Edmonton is not what is needed at this point, the defense (especially Pronger, where did he go?) was the problem last night. And please, someone tell Ales Hemskey to shoot the puck.
Posted: 11:31 AM   by Anonymous
Markkanen played well...his team did not. Discipline needs improvement. Edmonton is not out of this yet...just ask San Jose.
Posted: 11:44 AM   by Anonymous
First off, yes Roloson was the goalie that got the Oil to the cup, but before his injury, he was less than impressive in his finals debut...the Oil need to clamp down on defense and not let the Canes' forwards free lance in front of the net the way they were doing in the 3rd period of game 1 and all fo game 2.
I believe that the next game will be much more comptetive especially since the Oil are back for some home cooking, and eventually the Oil will solve Cam ward again and before the series is said and done, Martin Gerber will get a taste of the finals. Do not count out the Oilers cause the sharks were up 2 to 0 on them in the conference semis. Yes it will be an uphill battle, but it is not impossible.
Posted: 11:53 AM   by Anonymous
One factor the Oilers really need to capitalize on is to use there huge punishing forward: George Laraque. He has not been on the ice long during the series, but when he has the Canes' want nothing to do with him. One evident aspect was at the end of the game when the cheap shot the Canes' player into the boards he immediately got a major pentalty, but usually when a teammate gets cheap shot like that into the boards like that you would go and defend your teammate get into the face of the culprit, but all Matt Cullen could do was shake his head and say "that was wrong" simply because it was Laraque, he didnt want to get too close. My point in put this big guy in front of the net, and let him disrupt Ward's visibility and if a defenseman wants to get into a shoving match with big George then I bid them luck. This is just one of many few little things the Oil need to do to make this final competitive.
Posted: 3:19 PM   by Anonymous
>Its a shame but oh well.

Yeah, it's a shame Eric Cole can't play in the series either because of an INJURY (this one the result of a cheap shot).

It's pro sports. You build your team with depth to overcome such (inevitable) events - just like the Canes did, and the Oilers obviously didn't.

BTW: The Oilers look like a gooney bunch that have no place in the Finals anyway. Now THERE'S some "luck."
Posted: 4:07 PM   by Anonymous
Being a Carolina Hurricanes fan, I find it hard to digest that all the Oilers' woes are being centered on their goalie, of which they did to themselves. Canes lost one of their best players (Cole) back the first of March, but they have persevered, learned to play together as a team, and see where it has gotten them! They are doing "Whatever It Takes" to win the Stanley Cup.
As a Sabres fan I am disappointed on so many levels...selfishly I am disappointed that our D-corps went down like they were the cast of Final Destination (watch out Campbell and Lydman). But now that the series is over with I am disappointed in the quality of hockey so far in the finals (or lack thereof). To think the Canes which is a good squad, will win Lord Stanley’s highly coveted cup due to injuries is disappointing, nor have I seen anything quite like it in hockey.

The Capitan and heart and soul of the Habs (Koivu) getting carved up took the life out of the legs of the Canadians. Then a team that rode an improbable streak into the playoffs (and really shouldn't have been there in the first place) the Devils deflated as expected (you can only ride a hot goalie for so long, the guys in front of him have to skate and score). Most recently the Sabres Defensive unit disappeared with injuries faster than we can drop bombs on people in other country's and now Rollie gets a fork put in him and is on the shelf for the rest of the season...so I ask, if the Canes do win (which they should) did they really win at all?

The only solace I can take from this as a Sabres fan and a hockey fan in general is the fact that the Canes will be forgotten once they do win, it is just too bad as this year the playoffs were shaping up into what could have been one for the ages.
Posted: 6:16 PM   by Anonymous
At the start of the third period in game 6 against Detroit, I thought the Oilers were done. Surely the Red Wings would nurse their lead and win game 7 at home. After the first two games against San Jose, I was sure the Oilers were finished, facing a Sharks team that was so clearly superior at every position. After nearly blowing a 4-0 lead in game 3 and then getting crushed in game 4 against Anaheim, it looked like the flu and the playoff grind had finally gotten to them. . . .

As an Oiler fan, I'm not going to jinx them now. This series is clearly over. There's no point in even coming back to Edmonton. The Oilers should book their tickets to whatever Long Beach golf course they prefer and concede the cup. No sense for the players to risk some career ending injury or something playing this thing out. . . .
"As an Oiler fan, I'm not going to jinx them now. This series is clearly over. There's no point in even coming back to Edmonton. The Oilers should book their tickets to whatever Long Beach golf course they prefer and concede the cup. No sense for the players to risk some career ending injury or something playing this thing out. . . ."

Bravo! GREAT COMMENTS! It reminds me of where I and my friends were a week ago with my Sabres. There is nothing more contagious than believing, I truly hope that this belief can run through the Oiler's locker-room the same why the Flu did.
Posted: 11:21 PM   by Anonymous
I am in the minority here, but I think Jason Smith cost the Oilers the 5th goal in Game 1.

I doubt Smith would have tried to "rescue" the goalie if Roloson were in the game.

Smith panicked and tried to pick the puck from his own goalie. If he had taken the normal position, the backhand pass from Conkiln would have been easily cleared by Smith.

Instead, he tries to steal the puck from his goalie and the puck deflected off his stick right to Rod.

Edmonton panicked with their goalie injury, which is why they will lose the Cup, not due to the goalies.
"Edmonton panicked with their goalie injury, which is why they will lose the Cup, not due to the goalies."

HUH? You just said the Oilers panicked because of the goalie injury and then go on to say they will lose but not because of the goalie - that is some amazing logic, did your Dad invent the magic bullet theory?

If the Oilers played differently because of the goalie injury (which they did) then it is because of the goalie injury that they played differently - thus it is because of the goalie that they lost.

Presto, a quick lesson in logic.
Posted: 12:57 PM   by Anonymous
"The only solace I can take from this as a Sabres fan and a hockey fan in general is the fact that the Canes will be forgotten once they do win, it is just too bad as this year the playoffs were shaping up into what could have been one for the ages."

this comment is the very reason that every fan of the boofalo sabres are roundly laughed at in the world of hockey...sore losers and whiny to boot...now sit home and shaddup you big baby...GO CANES!!!
Search