SI Vault
 
Should Every Team Have an All-Star Rep?
June 22, 1998
YESBaseball spends all year splintering itself; the All-Star Game is the one night when the haves and have-nots get together. Let's keep it that way, if only to remind everyone there are still teams in places like Minnesota and Montreal. We know talent is concentrated on a handful of oligarchic clubs, so no one needs a midsummer classic clogged with Braves and Yankees. That's what the World Series is for.
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
June 22, 1998

Should Every Team Have An All-star Rep?

View CoverRead All Articles View This Issue

YES
Baseball spends all year splintering itself; the All-Star Game is the one night when the haves and have-nots get together. Let's keep it that way, if only to remind everyone there are still teams in places like Minnesota and Montreal. We know talent is concentrated on a handful of oligarchic clubs, so no one needs a midsummer classic clogged with Braves and Yankees. That's what the World Series is for.

—Stephen Cannella

Or

NO
What a radical idea: pick the best players instead of treating this showcase as if it's an every-homeroom-gets-represented student council. The rule made an All-Star out of .272 hitter Tony Womack last year, while worthies such as Tony Clark and Trevor Hoffman have never suited up. Faux-stars in 1998 might include Edgar Renteria (above), when everyone knows "All-Star Marlin" is an oxymoron.

—Tom Verducci

1