It was a flip remark, tossed off for reasons unclear even after the extraordinary events of last weekend had played out. Maybe he meant to be a provocateur. Perhaps he was indulging in nothing more than a moment of youthful bravado, trying to impress four buddies who had gone with him to Assembly Hall on the Indiana campus early last Thursday afternoon to buy football tickets. In any case, when Kent Harvey, a twitchy 19-year-old freshman, spotted the Hoosiers' basketball coach, he said, "Hey, what's up, Knight?"
Harvey and his friends say Bob Knight grabbed Harvey by the arm, dragged him aside and, according to one member of their party, said, "Show me some f———respect. I'm older than you." Knight says he lightly touched Harvey on the arm, never used profanity and was only trying to teach a lesson in "manners and civility" that any adult might offer.
But Knight had long ago turned in his adult card. He once told an arena full of people that his critics could "kiss my ass." He threw a potted plant against a framed picture in the athletic department, causing a secretary to be hit by flying glass. He verbally and physically intimidated and harassed players, colleagues, referees and strangers. After a university investigation brought on by a videotape that surfaced last spring of Knight's hand thrust to the jugular of former player Neil Reed, Indiana president Myles Brand warned Knight that a new "zero-tolerance policy" would subject him to immediate dismissal if he were to slip up again. One stipulation of the zero-tolerance guidelines held that "any verifiable, inappropriate physical contact...with members of the university community...will be cause for...immediate termination." So on Sunday afternoon, in announcing that Knight had been fired, Brand insisted that it really wasn't his decision to end Knight's boisterous tenure in Bloomington after 29 years, but Knight's.
"It was the ethical and moral thing to do, to give him one last chance [in May]," Brand said. "The fact is that having given Coach Knight one last opportunity, he failed to take advantage of it." Indeed, during Sunday's press conference Brand sounded at times like an apostle of some new math that requires an accumulation of missteps to breach a threshold of zero tolerance. Since he had last assembled the press in Indianapolis on May 15, there had been "many instances," Brand said, in which Knight had been "defiant and hostile" and otherwise demonstrated that he had "no desire, contrary to what he personally promised me, to live within the guidelines."
Knight, Brand said, had demonstrated continued "unwillingness to work within the normal chain of command." Not once since pledging to change had Knight spoken to athletic director Clarence Doninger, whom he physically threatened after a game last Feb. 19, even though Doninger had sent word through intermediaries that he wanted to start anew. Indiana had gone so far as to recruit a retired vice president of the university, Ed Williams, with whom Knight was friendly, to act as a go-between with Doninger. "I was willing to meet," Doninger told SI. "[Knight] was not willing."
Indiana couldn't have been more accommodating in how it imposed the sanctions announced last spring, which included a three-game suspension and a $30,000 fine. Instead of laying down the law, the school allowed Knight to negotiate which games he would sit out, and the two sides finally agreed on the final two games of the regular season and the first game of the Big Ten tournament. Yet not before Knight met the administration's deference with enough disdain that Brand pronounced him "uncooperative."
Further, Brand said, Knight had made several public and private statements that embarrassed the university. The president didn't elaborate, but in a press release a week earlier Knight cited "the nebulous guidelines of the zero-tolerance policy" as his reason for refusing to teach a coaching course he had taught for years.
The most serious incident occurred at the end of July. Knight and the university administration had a range of business matters to discuss—including a mess of Knight's own making: a lawsuit by former Indiana assistant Ron Felling, who claims that while firing him last December, Knight violently pushed him up against a wall. Dorothy Frapwell, the university's general counsel, and another attorney met in Knight's office to discuss this and other matters. When the subject turned to his $30,000 fine, Knight, according to Indiana spokesman Christopher Simpson, "became enraged. He was profane. He was rude. And he was intimidating."
If Knight had any chance of surviving despite all these episodes, that possibility disappeared last Friday when he blindsided the administration by holding a press conference to offer his version of the encounter with Harvey. At 10:30 p.m. Brand phoned Knight at home and discovered that Knight had booked a fishing trip to Canada for the following morning. Brand made it clear that this wasn't the time to be leaving town. Knight went anyhow, committing one last transgression that Brand described as "gross insubordination."
Early on Sunday morning Brand phoned Knight and offered him a choice: He could resign or he would be fired in accordance with paragraph 9 of his contract. "Coach did say he did not believe he did anything wrong," Brand said of their 10-minute conversation, in which Knight declined to quit. "He did try to change my mind. He talked of his success at IU and that he would try harder in the future."