SI Vault
 
19TH HOLE: THE READERS TAKE OVER
June 24, 1963
BOILING OIL Sirs: I am heartily ashamed of you! You yourselves have become the prime example of what you were talking about regarding the moral crisis in sport (May 20).
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
June 24, 1963

19th Hole: The Readers Take Over

View CoverRead All Articles View This Issue

BOILING OIL
Sirs:
I am heartily ashamed of you! You yourselves have become the prime example of what you were talking about regarding the moral crisis in sport (May 20).

In your coverage of the Indianapolis "500" (Close Call for a Jones Boy, June 10) you take the position that Chief Steward Harlan Fengler was justified in not black-flagging Parnelli Jones for the sole reason that Jones was leading the race at the time. I quote: "He presumably would have black-flagged the Jones car if it had been out of serious contention."

The black flag is not intended to help the leader win nor the laggard lose; it is intended solely to safeguard all of the contestants, regardless of position. As Jimmy Clark said, "I would much rather be second than dead." Fortunately, in this particular case the resulting spins were not fatal (except perhaps to those car owners' pocketbooks), but the fact remains: a safety flag's use should be based solely on the matter of safety and not be decided by an impromptu trackside lobbying session—in this case by the leading car's owner!
GORDON HARVIN GLASS
Newport Beach, Calif.

Sirs:
Sour grapes to Kenneth Rudeen. In one breath he strengthens the position of a wishy-washy track official (Steward Fengler) and then adds gross insult to injury with some sentimental slop about not depriving Parnelli Jones of racing's richest plum for just spewing oil all over the track.

Then Rudeen follows with a coup de grace of circumlocution and rationalization by saying, in effect, the Lotus-Fords finished higher than anyone thought they would in the first place, so why gripe?

To summarize, Rudeen castigates Eddie Sachs as a very emotional driver, placates the very fine Chapman-Clark team and raises high the pedestal for Parnelli Jones, winner by virtue of a double standard.
WILLIAM T. BATES
Rutledge, Pa.

Sirs:
Do you also believe that a fighter who happens to be leading on points should not be penalized for a foul blow?
ROBERT CRICHTON
Toronto

Sirs:
Throughout the article it is repeated that it would have been a shame if Jones had been black-flagged. Sports fans feel it is a shame to see many things happen in their favorite sports. I am sure Met fans are sorry to see their team lose, and feel that it is a shame it had to happen. However, I am positive that even the most die-hard fans would balk at seeing their team stretch the rules in order to win.
BOB EIDEN
Chicago

?Hidden behind all this exhaust smoke is the fact that Chapman and Clark, who stood to lose the most, concurred with Steward Fengler's decision not to black-flag Jones's car, and Lotus-Ford's Benson Ford told Fengler he made a "fine decision."—ED.

PIT CHAMP
Sirs:
I thought your readers might be interested in the identity of one of Jimmy Clark's wheel changers—the one shown in your picture with the upraised arm, indicating that he had completed his part of the pit procedure in 20 seconds, 12.3 seconds ahead of the others. Had the other pit attendants done their work in 20 seconds, Clark would have emerged 1.3 seconds ahead of Jones.

Continue Story
1 2 3 4