SI Vault
 
Four youthful new kings
Charles Goren
April 14, 1969
If last month's Vanderbilt team championship proved anything, it is that there's a new breed of player ready, willing and apparently able to take over from our veteran bridge stars. And, based on recent World Championship disappointments, this may not be an entirely unhappy state of affairs.
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
April 14, 1969

Four Youthful New Kings

View CoverRead All Articles View This Issue

If last month's Vanderbilt team championship proved anything, it is that there's a new breed of player ready, willing and apparently able to take over from our veteran bridge stars. And, based on recent World Championship disappointments, this may not be an entirely unhappy state of affairs.

As a member of that fading generation, I did not look with satisfaction—or even equanimity—upon, the spectacle of 10-time Vanderbilt winner Howard Schenken bowing out before the quarter-finals. I saw George Rap�e, who played on the team that won the first Bermuda Bowl event for us, eliminated in the semifinals, even though his team included five other players who represented us in the World Championships: Edgar Kaplan, Norman Kay, Eric Murray, Sammy Kehela and Sidney Lazard.

What beat the Rap�e team, however, was not age; two of them are under 40, three more under 45. Rap�e himself is in his early 50s. But the four young Californians who beat them and went on to win the Vanderbilt—Richard Walsh, Jerry Hallee, John Swanson and the winner of the McKenney Trophy for the most master points acquired in 1968, Paul Soloway—behaved like a team of destiny from the moment that they barely escaped elimination in the qualifying rounds. Their ages run from 26 to 33 and, since there were only four of them, they played straight through the Vanderbilt without substitutions.

Murray-Kehela's reputation for opening the bidding on very light hands hurt them in this deal from the semifinals, even though, on this occasion, Murray had full values for his bid.

It is most unusual to leave in a takeout double of a one-bid, but Walsh elected to do so because of the vulnerability and the Murray reputation for shoestring openings. The defenders followed up by plucking Murray clean.

East won the spade lead with the ace and returned the 10 of hearts! Murray might have done better by ducking this trick, but he figured that both the king and queen were behind him, so he went up with the ace and led the king of diamonds. West began an echo by dropping the seven, and East let the diamond king hold. On the following lead to dummy's diamond queen, East won with the ace, cashed the king of hearts and led a low spade. South ruffed with the 4 of hearts and got out by leading the jack of hearts to West's queen, dummy and East discarding spades.

West cashed the king of spades, on which South threw a club, and exited by leading the 10 of clubs. East continued to make it difficult for South to read the hand by playing the king of clubs, coaxing South to win with the ace.

At this point, Murray wrongly visualized the opponents' cards as:

— [Spade]
[9 of Hearts]
[8 of Hearts]
— [Diamond]
[Queen of Clubs]
[9 of Clubs]

— [Spade]
— [Heart]
[10 of Diamonds]
[8 of Diamonds]
[6 of Clubs]
[3 of Clubs]

Continue Story
1 2