Reading A Home on the Range (July 6), which was about Airstream Caravan No. 71, I remarked to my 11-year-old daughter: "Well, I'll clip this and send it to Grandpa"—who was with Airstream Caravan No. 74, somewhere in Saskatoon. Finishing the article, I had second thoughts. Grandpa might not enjoy reading it at all!
So Caravaners wear blue berets and "tend to huddle" in their "way of life." So what? So they like to relax on the road on over-organized Middle American comfortable cushions in identical "glistening aluminum-skinned vehicles." So what? So these "over-60s" have earned "all the fun and none of the responsibility" of grandparents everywhere—in this case, all the fun (and none of the trials) of travel.
Give me the silver hairs in the silver trailers any day.
ELINOR H. THORKILDSEN
Old Saybrook, Conn.
Walter Bingham's excellent article on the Bermuda Bowl (No One Could Trump the Aces, July 6) leaves one thing out. He says that the opposition was not the greatest and he is correct in that statement. But he does not point out—and really could not—that the North American team played the best 512 hands of bridge ever played. It wasn't perfect. Perfect bridge is impossible to achieve, but in my 40 years of playing and watching I have never seen a performance to equal theirs. They may never play this well again, but for that one period they would have beaten any team that ever played bridge and beaten them decisively.
Over the past years there has been a thought or two as to why pitchers have been allowed to stand immune to reprimand or punishment for throwing beanballs. Commissioner Bowie Kuhn and Superscout Frank Lane (SCORECARD, July 6) have agreed on some solutions to some of these problems.
My suggestion is to make the pitcher-batter-relationship more of a duel. If the pitcher is permitted to throw "at" the batter, then give the batter an equal opportunity under the equal opportunity and fair practices act to throw at the pitcher.
It is very hard to believe that the staff at SI, some members of which are graduates of the University of North Carolina, could approve of the first SCORECARD item in the July 6 issue concerning the decision of young Tom McMillen to attend that school.
You suggest that the University of North Carolina uses a system of college recruiting geared to obtain a basketball player instead of the student or person. Tom McMillen is an 18-year-old student who plans to become a doctor. He—not his parents—should be the one responsible for making a decision concerning his college education. Undergraduate as well as graduate schools in the field of medicine at North Carolina have always been highly regarded on a national level, at least until the recent article by SI. Also, a statement that Tom McMillen decided to attend North Carolina just to play basketball and without regard to its scholastic program underestimates the intelligence of a person who was the valedictorian of his high school class.
HUNTER H. GALLOWAY III
Chapel Hill, N.C.
One thing you failed to mention in your article about the heavy-hitting Reds (The Cincy Cannonball, July 13) was that baseball was meant to be played on grass, not on some synthetic. The fact is that like all other teams with AstroTurf, the Reds will also begin to lose. Not one team with AstroTurf is above .500 (Houston 39-53, St. Louis 41-49, San Francisco 43-46, Chicago White Sox 32-62, the last with just a synthetic infield). And Cincinnati recently lost two games in a row to the Padres, the worst team in the National League. While AstroTurf may be of use in preventing football injuries, it makes the game of baseball less exciting. Give mean un-symmetrical park with grass: Crosley Field, Connie Mack Stadium or Wrigley Field. That is where baseball is played. The Reds will find that out.
P. STUART REICHERTZ
I am taking violent exception to a sentence in the July 13 issue: "...instead of that marching-band-at-halftime nonsense, ABC will run film-clip highlights of all the pro football games played the day before."