Academics,
researchers, field people, naturalists, herdsmen, falconers, pet keepers,
everyone who has had much intimate experience with other creatures knows beyond
doubt that individual members of species have what we call, in ourselves,
distinct personalities. They must, because the activity of a single creature
reflects a combination of inherited behavioral responses and learning—that is,
knowledge acquired through individual experience. No two have precisely the
same experience (or, presumably, the same inherited capacity for acquiring
experience and acting on it), and therefore, each personality is in some
respects unique, whether it be in men or moose. However, to prepare even a
sketchy biography of a single moose, to investigate the myriad formative
influerices, would be far more difficult and time-consuming than chronicling
the life of a defrocked politician. Also, it would be practically impossible,
communication alone being (for now, anyway) an almost insurmountable barrier
between man and moose. Finally, there is little professional incentive to make
such differentiation. In practice, therefore, we generally treat each species
other than Homo sapiens collectively, noting common characteristics and
proceeding as if the behavior and potential of each individual is identical. We
know this is not the case, but do not know how to work the personality factor
into our studies, all of which are distorted by this omission. The distortion
is implicit in our judgments and predictions and generalization about other
species, which are upset when an individual like the Missouri Kid comes
along.
Inexplicably
driven, the Kid came loping down the Des Moines River in the fall of 1977. By
late October he had reached the vicinity of Boone, about 150 miles from that
year's starting point in Emmetsburg. Gladfelter is based in Boone at a wildlife
research station, and he went out from it to meet the moose. "He was moving
right along," Gladfelter reports, "but seemed in good condition and
gave no apparent signs of panic or being disoriented. There was a question of
what he'd do next, since we are on the edge of the Des Moines metropolitan
area."
What the Kid did
during the last few days of October was pass through the Des Moines area, an
urban center of some 200,000. That, at least, is the only reasonable
assumption, because less than a week after he was seen north of Des Moines in
Boone by Gladfelter, he was spotted 20 miles or so south of the city, still
along the river. Somehow he slipped past the metropolis undetected, a
thought-provoking feat for a 1,000-pound animal carrying a four-foot rack of
antlers.
"The most
amazing thing," says Gladfelter, "is that he must've crossed a couple
of interstates and a lot of other roads with heavy traffic." It is possible
that some people did see him but didn't believe, or want to report, the
evidence of their own senses—a bull moose jogging along I-80.
The Kid made his
last appearance in Iowa on the 16th of November, well down the river beyond
Ottumwa, more than 75 miles southeast of Des Moines. By mid-December he had
traveled another 30 or 40 miles and was below the Iowa line in Clark County,
Mo., in the northeast corner of the state. There, another deer biologist, Wayne
Porath of the Missouri Department of Conservation, took over as his
Boswell.
"I'd heard
about the Iowa sightings," says Porath, "so it didn't come as a
complete shock when he turned up here. But it certainly was a curiosity. We had
an elk wander down from Wyoming along the Missouri River a few years ago.
Occasionally roadrunners or armadillo show up in the southwestern part of the
state, and we get rumors of mountain lions, but there's never been anything
comparable to the moose. So far as I can find in the literature, there's never
been a wild moose in Missouri before—at least not since the Ice Age."
However, during
the first seven or eight months of 1978 the Kid was seldom spotted in
northeastern Missouri, and there was some speculation that he may have made
only a cameo, for-the-record appearance. In retrospect it seems likely that he
had again found a secluded wooded area (one less accessible to sightseers than
had been the case in northern Iowa) and remained close to it through the spring
and summer. Whatever his arrangements, he was in fine fettle and full antler by
fall, and for the second autumn in a row set off on a grand tour.
Traversing the
drainage systems of the Fabius and Salt rivers and Perche Creek, he leisurely
circled through north-central Missouri, first heading southwest, then north and
finally east, back toward the Mississippi. On this jaunt he was frequently
observed, and at one point late in October he was spotted near Harrisburg, 15
miles from Columbia and only about 20 miles north of the Missouri River. It was
his most southerly penetration, and by then the Kid had broken all known
records for long-distance moose. In Harrisburg he was 100 miles south of the
Iowa line and more than 600 miles south of the nearest conventional range for
his species on the Minnesota-Canadian border. That's as the crow flies. He had
probably wandered twice that distance as the moose walks.
By the first of
November he had traveled 20 miles north of Harrisburg and was reported in
soybean, winter-wheat and oak-brush country near Moberly, which is the home of
Paul Jeffries. Jeffries is a veteran conservation department field-agent who
works with area farmers to restore old and create new wildlife habitat. Being
intensely interested in the Missouri Kid, Jeffries called Porath, a longtime
friend and bow-hunting companion, and suggested that they do a little moose
looking. The two men didn't catch up with the Kid but spent most of the time
following his tracks and deducing from other signs what he had been doing.
Mostly he had fed on multiflora roses, which grow in the area, but he had also,
fastidiously, without causing much damage, nibbled some winter-wheat shoots.
This came as a surprise, because a moose, even if it had reason to suspect that
wheat sprouts were tasty, would have difficulty getting at such a low-growing
crop. The long, almost giraffe-like legs of a moose give it considerable
advantage when it comes to wading and foraging in swamps or reaching up to
strip foliage and buds from tree limbs, but the animal is not well designed for
bending over and grazing like a sheep or cow. There is just too much moose for
this sort of stoop labor.
"That moose
figured out the winter-wheat problem without any trouble at all," Jeffries
reports admiringly of the Missouri Kid. "He just got down on his prayer
bones to get at it."