After each win in
George Mason's Cinderella run to the 2006 Final Four, Patriots coach Jim
Larranaga was careful to talk about more than basketball with reporters. He
would mention Mason's academic strength--including the Nobel Prize winners on
its faculty--and its diverse student body. Watching at home, Andrew Flagel, the
school's dean of admissions, would beam. "The great thing about Jim is, no
one had to get on the phone and say, 'Here's what we want you to talk
about,'" Flagel says. "We just needed to stay out of his way."
George Mason's
string of upsets over such name-brand programs as Michigan State, North
Carolina and Connecticut was certainly a boon to the basketball program, but
officials at the 34-year-old university in Fairfax, Va., believe the wins could
give an even greater boost to the school. Soon after the tournament ended, the
administration established a committee called Operation Legacy, and it has been
trying to maximize the benefits of the team's success ever since.
Despite being the
largest university in Virginia, with almost 30,000 students, George Mason is
sometimes confused with George Washington and James Madison, more established
neighboring colleges named for better-known founding fathers. Part of the
school's image problem is that only about 4,000 of its students live on campus;
the rest are commuters. Now, says school president Alan Merten, "we no
longer have to answer the question, What is George Mason University? We've
become a household word."
George Mason
would have had to spend at least $50 million for a public-relations campaign
that gave it the exposure it received during the tournament. That's the
conservative estimate of C. Scott Bozman, an associate professor of business
marketing at Gonzaga, who studied the benefits of hoops success at his own
school. Robert Baker, a George Mason associate professor who will be
undertaking a similar analysis this summer, says, "We should exceed that
amount if we're thorough [in tracking every mention]."
The publicity has
already shown returns. Student inquiries and tour sizes have tripled, and
merchandise sales have skyrocketed. In March the campus bookstore sold more
than $800,000 worth of George Mason clothing, compared with $625,000 worth in
all of 2004--05.
The surge in
Mason pride is expected to boost alumni donations as well. During the
tournament more than 1,000 alums registered on the school's website, increasing
the size of the database by 10%. Judith Jobbitt, the school's vice president
for alumni affairs, says George Mason hopes to increase fund-raising for the
coming year by 25%, to $25 million.
The admissions
office was particularly aggressive in capitalizing on Mason mania. It sent a
torrent of e-mails to students who had applied to the school, using the
basketball news as an entree to tout the university's academic virtues. The
school projects a 2% increase in the number of applicants who say yes to an
acceptance letter. Flagel also expects to see an uptick of 10 points in the
students' average SAT score.
There are
skeptics, of course, about the notion that sports can elevate a university.
"It's silly," says Andrew Zimbalist, an economics professor at Smith
College and author of Unpaid Professionals, a critical look at college sports.
"A school can get a short-term kick, but the gain doesn't sustain
itself." Many schools, he says, end up losing money--and their
values--chasing that winning feeling.
George Mason will
in fact be spending more money. The school gave Larranaga a pay raise, some
contractual bonuses and an extra $100,000 just for being such an effective
spokesman. It will also fast-track the construction of a $5 million sports
practice facility that previously languished on a long-term wish list.
Merten is
confident that his school can build its hoops program and retain its soul. He
has always seen sports as George Mason's "front porch," as he puts it;
he meets with every basketball recruit in his office and attends every home
game.