Time Bomb
Coaches are
panning new TV-friendly clock-stoppage rules that are shortening games by an
average of 13 snaps
When the NCAA
Football Rules Committee codified instant replay last February, it was perhaps
the most significant and popular change to college football's bylaws since
overtime was introduced in 1996. But rule-book revisions that were adopted
concurrently with instant replay--and with far less fanfare--haven't been as
well-received. Two weeks into the season, coaches around the country are
griping loudly about a pair of new timekeeping procedures designed to shorten
games: One mandates that time start on a kickoff at the moment the ball is
kicked (not when the receiving team touches it), and the other, more
controversial, change involves starting the clock after a change of possession
at the referee's ready-for-play signal, not on the snap of the ball.
Committee members
estimated that the clock changes would reduce the number of snaps in a game by
up to 24; in fact, the average has fallen by about 13. Meanwhile, televised
games are shorter by about 10 minutes. But that doesn't mean the coaches have
to like it. "I think the new rules are stupid," says Texas Tech's Mike
Leach. "It's interesting to me that we talk about football, football,
football, and then we do all we can to have less football." Adds Minnesota
coach Glen Mason, "The reason we're doing this is to shorten the game for
TV."
In addition to
losing plays, coaches also face a clock-management problem at the end of close
games. In effect a trailing team has only two timeouts with which to work.
Take, for example, the situation faced by Miami's Larry Coker late in his
team's loss to Florida State on Sept. 4. It has become a case study for the
many critics of the change-of-possession rule. Trailing 13--10 with 2:19 left
and having given the ball back to the Seminoles on a punt, Coker called one of
his three timeouts before Florida State even snapped the ball.
Florida coach
Urban Meyer has vowed not to rest until the new rule is rescinded, telling The
Palm Beach Post that "if it doesn't get in the way of my family and
recruiting, I'll go nuts on it."
Not every coach is
opposed to the change. After all, the rules committee is made up of a dozen
current and former coaches, including Auburn's Tommy Tuberville, who sees a
chance for innovation. "I think you're going to see a faster tempo from the
offenses," he told Florida Today.
But why didn't the
rules committee just adopt some of the commonsense timing standards used in the
NFL, in which halftime is 12 minutes instead of 20, the clock doesn't stop
while the chains are being reset after a first down and the average length of a
game in 2005 was 3:08? The panel recommended shortening halftime to 15 minutes,
but the NCAA's Playing Rules Oversight Panel said that marching bands needed 20
minutes to perform. As for eliminating the clock stoppages on first down, it
would have been the only thing more unpopular with coaches than the new
change-of-possession policy. "That's sacred to the coaches," says John
Adams, the secretary and rules editor of the committee. "We've proposed
that many times over the years, and they've always been unanimously against
it."
Adams hastens to
add that the timekeeping procedures can be revisited by the committee at the
end of the season. "This is a one-year trial," he says. "I don't
think it's fair to decide after two weeks."
Clock Watching