2) Speed? The
Twins were third in steals in the American League the season before Martin took
them over, but fell to fourth with him. His division champion Tigers stole only
17 bases all season long. The Rangers barely improved their league ranking
under Martin, moving from sixth to fifth. The Yankees did jump from sixth to
third in steals during Martin's first year as their manager, but fell to
seventh the next season, when he won his world championship in New York.
3) When Nolan
Ryan shifted from the California Angels to the Houston Astros after the 1979
season, the experts produced an amazing statistic that keeps cropping up: in
games he started in which he held a lead in the eighth inning, Ryan had won 109
times and lost only twice, a startling .982 career percentage. Wow! However,
all American League starters in 1979 who held a lead in the eighth inning won
586 times and lost 18, a percentage of .970, or [12/1000] worse than Ryan's.
That means that the average starting pitcher underperforms Nolan in the late
innings about once every 80 or 90 starts, or not quite twice in four
seasons.
4) Although Ryan
led the staff in per-game attendance on the road, more folks per start came to
the Astrodome last year when Joe Niekro pitched—or, for that matter, Vern
Ruhle—than when Ryan started, which is nothing new. In California in 1976 Nolan
was outdrawn in per-start attendance by such Angel stalwarts as Don Kirkwood
and Gary Ross. In 1978 he was the fourth-most-watched pitcher per start on the
Angel staff.
5) The Expos may
finally win the NL East, but September hasn't been the problem in the past. The
Pirates in 1979 and the Phils in 1980 did edge ahead of them near the wire to
win the division, but in those two seasons the Expos had an admirable 44-22
(.667) record beginning Sept. 1. In fact, only once since 1973 have the Expos
failed to play better than their season-long percentage in the stretch.
6) The man who
picked the Phils to finish fifth last year is also responsible for the
iconoclastic information detailed in the answers to 1), 2), 3), 4) and 5). His
name is Bill James, and he lives in Lawrence, Kans., where he digs through
mountains of baseball statistics and comes up with out-of-the-ordinary
conclusions. Some of these he prints in magazine articles, but most of them are
saved for an annual he calls Baseball Abstract, of which he is owner,
publisher, editor, statistician and staff. Sometimes James gets carried away
and makes extravagant statements, even errors, but he ought to be forgiven them
because most of the baseball tidbits he comes up with—some speculative, some
factual—are fun to chew on (lefthanded pitchers throw more double-play balls
than righthanders do; power pitchers tend to have longer careers than control
pitchers; base stealing, even when it's successful two-thirds of the time,
doesn't add much to a team's run total; managers who get close to their players
and exhort them may have early success, but they often aren't as successful in
the long run as those who don't get emotionally involved; contrary to accepted
belief, it's not essential that a relief pitcher be able "to come in there
and throw strikes"). As with Babe Ruth, when James hits one it's a beauty,
and even when he strikes out it's worth watching.
Like this
Phillies business, for instance. James ordinarily doesn't care to make flat-out
predictions. "I have never told anybody, any time, any place, that I could
predict who was going to win a pennant race," he says. "The reason I
sometimes make predictions is that people who run what I write insist that I
do, or they won't pay me."
Still, the world
champions fifth? James says he had good reasons for denigrating the Phillies
before last season began. As he wrote then, "The starting eight of the
Phils has nearly 100 years of professional experience, which would be wonderful
if they were in the real estate business. There is a tunnel at the end of the
light, and it is not far off." In short, the Phils were a very old ball
club, and very old ball clubs tend to fall abruptly.
What happened?
James, entranced by numbers even when they're not at all what he anticipated
they would be, sifted through the stats to find out: "You hear baseball
people say every winter that this player is going to make us 10, 15, 20 games
better. No player in the history of the game has ever been 20 games better than
the average player at his position, not Babe Ruth, not Ty Cobb. The difference
between a Most Valuable Player and an average player at the same position is as
little as three games in some seasons, usually five to eight, maybe once in a
decade 10. But what happened in Philadelphia in 1980 was unprecedented. Three
players—Mike Schmidt, Steve Carlton and Tug McGraw—made up virtually the entire
difference between the world championship team and a contender for last
place.
"The Phillies
had only one player, Schmidt, who was able to combine the accomplishments of
batting as high as .260 and hitting as many as 10 home runs. Schmidt batted
.286 and hit 48 home runs, or 41% of his team's total. Only one other time
since 1950 has anyone on a world championship team had more than 30% (Willie
Stargell nosed past that figure 10 years ago with 31% of the 1971 Pirates'
homers). Yet Schmidt had 41%! It's so far out of line, it's off the chart.
"Now Carlton.
The Phils were 91-71 in the regular season, or 20 games over .500. Only three
Phillie pitchers were able to win more than seven games, but Carlton was 24-9,
or 15 games over .500 all by himself.