SI Vault
 
Ivan Was Great, The Tournament Was Terrible
Barry McDermott
January 25, 1982
In a chaotic week, Ivan Lendl made a remarkable comeback in the Masters final to win his biggest tournament to date
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
January 25, 1982

Ivan Was Great, The Tournament Was Terrible

In a chaotic week, Ivan Lendl made a remarkable comeback in the Masters final to win his biggest tournament to date

View CoverRead All Articles View This Issue
Print This PRINT E-mail This EMAIL Most Popular MOST POPULAR SHARE SHARE

Ivan Lendl climbed out of the chaos of the Volvo Masters last week with much more than the thrill of victory in his first important tennis championship. After three years of trying to win a big one, the gifted young Czech had finally lived up to expectations. Sadly, though, so did the eight-man event, which is the culmination of the previous year's Grand Prix tour but once again was plagued by a ludicrous format that shortchanged the fans and had even tournament officials holding their heads in despair.

But just when everyone was ready to pelt the court at Madison Square Garden with rotten tomatoes, along came Lendl to put a better face on an ugly scene. His hair plastered down and his hollow eyes eerier than ever, Lendl was the hangman come calling. In the semifinals on Saturday he roared through John McEnroe 6-4, 6-2 in a devastating display of power tennis. Then in Sunday's final, against Vitas Gerulaitis, he overcame a two-set deficit and a match point to win 6-7, 2-6, 7-6, 6-2, 6-4. That victory was worth $100,000.

Gerulaitis had planned to attack behind sliced approaches to Lendl's backhand. For the better part of three sets that strategy worked as Lendl repeatedly missed backhand passes. In the third-set tiebreaker, which Lendl had led 4-1, Gerulaitis had match point at 6-5. But instead of following Lendl's second serve in to net, this time Vitas stayed back. Lendl responded with a wicked forehand that set up an easy smash.

From then on Gerulaitis was slower and slower afoot. Lendl had found the range with his backhand and had begun to dictate play with his forehand. When Gerulaitis double-faulted on break point at 2-2 in the fifth set, Lendl thought, "He's tired. This is my chance." Lendl lost only two points on serve the rest of the match.

This was a different Lendl—not the dour one prone to choking in big matches. Now all of 21 years old, he seems ready to achieve the greatness that Bjorn Borg predicted for him almost two years ago to the day. When asked where to look for his next challenger, Borg responded with Lendl's name.

Borg wasn't in New York to defend his Masters title. During his sabbatical from the game, he has been attending to his ailing wife, staying in shape by working out with a Division I hockey team in Sweden—in one impromptu game he scored three goals—and now. undoubtedly, reflecting on how correct he had been as a prognosticator. Lendl's victory in the Masters was his seventh straight Grand Prix tournament triumph, an all-conquering swath cut through six countries on clay, hard courts and indoor carpets. Excluding exhibitions, his last defeat was by Gerulaitis in the fourth round of the U.S. Open in September. Since then, Lendl has won 35 consecutive matches and 75 of 82 sets. Those numbers suggest domination, but Lendl, who has climbed to No. 2 on the computer behind McEnroe, realizes he still has a few fellows to stand and face. While he has won his last three matches against McEnroe, he has beaten Borg only twice in eight tries, and he is 0-8 against Jimmy Connors.

Last week he didn't have to face Connors, who couldn't play his way through the round-robin format used to determine the semifinalists. After defeating Eliot Teltscher 7-5, 6-1, Jimbo lost 6-2, 7-5 to McEnroe. The following night a gutsy performance by Roscoe Tanner finished Connors. Tanner, who had dropped his first two matches and had no chance of qualifying for the semis, played for something he said was more precious than money: dignity. Sticking out his jaw, sassing right back when Connors made belittling gestures, and plagued by cramps, Tanner needed three tiebreakers to win. The last set was the most remarkable, as Connors fought off five match points at 5-3 with Tanner serving. In the tiebreaker, Connors squandered two match points of his own before Tanner clinched it 9-7. "There's at least one who tries," Tanner said.

What Tanner was referring to centers around the round-robin format. The nightmare always occurs on Friday, the third day of play, when defaults and meaningless matches prevail. Assured of berths in the semis, both Borg and Guillermo Vilas defaulted their Friday matches in 1978, and Lendl admitted tanking last year against Connors to ensure he wouldn't face Borg in the semis.

This year it was more of the same. Told by tournament officials after his victory over Connors that he had clinched $30,000 for winning his round-robin group (that bonus was added this year as an enticement to eliminate tanking), McEnroe stayed out until 2:30 a.m. at a rock concert. But wait! The embarrassed officials discovered they had been mistaken. McEnroe actually needed a victory over Teltscher at the ungodly hour of 1 p.m. Friday to win his group.

What happened that afternoon was a disgrace. First a baggy-eyed McEnroe stumbled through his match, winning only five games and losing 12 of the last 13 points, as the fans booed. Then Jos�-Luis Clerc, who was to play Lendl, was a no-show, claiming tendinitis in his left ankle. That announcement was greeted with cynical hoots because Clerc already had lost twice and was out of contention.

Continue Story
1 2