Ever since Vijay Singh locked up the FedEx Cup playoffs and the $10 million first prize three weeks ago, fans and critics of the FedEx format have been offering opinions on how the system might be tweaked (GOLF PLUS, Sept. 16). Here are the official final FedEx Cup playoff standings, plus two final results based on formulas that are much easier to understand. The first alternative, Cumulative Scoring, simply treats the four playoff events as one 16-round tournament. The second, Money Won, is based on each player's total playoff earnings.
Steve Dennis (left), the PGA Tour's director of communications strategy, is the Tour's FedEx Cup points system guru. He discussed the current setup—and critiqued SI's Simpler Proposition to revise the FedEx format—with Gary Van Sickle.
SI: If you used our Cumulative Scoring formula instead of FedEx points, you would've had 11 guys within 10 strokes of the lead going into the Tour Championship instead of having Vijay Singh already winning the Cup.
SD: Having so many guys still in it would be good. That's something we want—the commissioner has made that clear. And the simplicity of Cumulative Scoring is good. But we feel we can't throw out the regular season and start fresh because the regular season, with the majors, is critically important.
SI: Maybe you need to get over that.
SD: It would be a significant issue to overcome. We looked at a lot of scenarios and knew that if a guy won twice, he'd basically have it locked up. Last year, Tiger didn't win twice until the Tour Championship.
SI: So it was good that Tiger skipped the first event?
SD: If he had finished top five at the Barclays, [the playoffs] might've been over early. Look at Rory Sabbatini last year. He had four top 10s but never sniffed a win. With Cumulative Scoring, you could easily have a guy like him win the FedEx Cup. NASCAR is fine with that, but in golf, winning is so important. People would be very unhappy if we had a FedEx Cup winner who hadn't won.
SI: Every plan has a drawback, doesn't it?