After good
players, good coaches and good health, nothing is more valuable to an NFL team
than having the goods on its next opponent. Just consider the lengths to which
teams will go not only to protect news about injuries (Point After, page 76)
and personnel changes on their own team, but also to gather information about
other clubs.
Before their
season opener a few years ago, the Patriots brought in a player who'd been
released by the team they were preparing to face in Week 1. He arrived at New
England's facility in Foxborough, Mass., expecting to be worked out and
possibly signed. The player never even made it to the practice field. After
Pats officials picked his brain about his former team, they put him on a flight
back home.
Of course, teams
also prepare themselves for the possible leaking of such info. When the Bears
let their 2007 starting wide receivers leave last off-season, releasing Muhsin
Muhammad in February and choosing not to pursue free agent Bernard Berrian in
March, offensive coordinator Ron Turner immediately made a mental note to
change his quarterbacks' hand signals and audible calls. He knew the receivers'
new teams were on Chicago's schedule this year and had to assume that Muhammad
(Panthers) and Berrian (Vikings) would give up the goods on their previous
employer. "Everybody exchanges information," a Bears official said last
week.
The issue of late
is what kind of information sharing, between which personnel, is considered
acceptable. Last week Fox Sports reported that Jets quarterback Brett Favre
supplied inside dope to then Lions general manager Matt Millen in September
before Detroit played the Packers, with whom Favre spent 16 seasons.
It's widely
accepted that players swap information about common opponents with players from
other teams; and two head coaches, speaking on the condition of anonymity,
acknowledged that coaches share information. What's almost unheard of, however,
is for a player on a current roster to discuss his former team's personnel or
schemes with a coach or official outside his organization. "There's an
unwritten rule that you don't do that," says one prominent defensive
coordinator. "If we have a relationship, definitely I will call another
coach about a team that he's faced and we're about to face. I'll ask things
like, What was your thought process? What did you see? A lot of times it's just
to verify what I saw on film already. But I never talk to players on other
teams about that stuff."
Favre, whose
separation from the Packers was bitter, denies providing detailed information
to the Lions, who lost to Green Bay 48-25 on Sept. 14. Still, even if he did,
he would not be violating league rules. The spirit of fair play, yes. But
there's no NFL stricture against the passing of info about mutual
opponents.
"Players share
information all the time," says Steelers linebacker James Farrior. "If
I'm playing a team and one of my friends played for that club, I'm going to
call him and try to get all the information I can. It's up to him to spill the
beans or not. I don't think it's wrong--it's just using all your
resources."
But Farrior's
teammate Hines Ward considers the practice overrated. "If you're not
familiar with the personnel, you might call a guy and ask about it," says
the Pro Bowl wideout. "But we don't get into play routes and stuff like
that. That's why you have coordinators. Who's to say they're going to run that
same play in the game? And what works for somebody else might not work for
you."
Still, knowledge
is power in the minds of many. For instance, the Chiefs came close to trading
safety Greg Wesley to the Broncos before last season but backed out because the
proposed compensation was not to their liking--and because some members of the
Kansas City organization were concerned about sending a player to a division
rival whom they face twice a year.
Even so, there's
some question about the value of such information. Farrior admits he doesn't
often get much from talking with other players about common opponents. "The
stuff that they tell you usually doesn't happen anyway," he says.
"You've got to look at the tape and see what the teams do and how they game
plan. You've got to go far deeper into it than what someone will say."