PGA Tour CONFIDENTIAL
June 13, 2011
Will Tiger be ready for the U.S. Open? Why the big stink over the President playing golf? Can an American win? What is the dream story line? And, of course, who will win America's national championship?
Garrity: I'm for Sunday-night finishes, the Woods-versus-Mediate playoff notwithstanding. Sudden death is like a coin toss, so I'm for a three- or four-hole playoff. There's an ebb and flow, and you can still get done before dark.
Shipnuck: I've changed my mind on this topic. I kind of like the Monday 18-hole playoff. It's so contrarian. It's fun to make people wait. It's not a 40-minute game, it's four days. Once a year for the most important championship, it's kind of cool.
Van Sickle: May I remind you of Retief Goosen versus Mark Brooks at Southern Hills?
Shipnuck: The actual playoffs aren't always so much fun. It's the idea that I like.
Anonymous Pro: I'd definitely rather see a three-holer. There's nothing less exciting than an 18-hole Open playoff on Monday. I know there's history and tradition and all those other USGA catchphrases, but almost every Monday finish is anticlimactic.
Shipnuck: Sudden death can feel like a letdown too. Think about that [2009] Masters playoff with Kenny Perry, Chad Campbell and Angel Cabrera. You're not guaranteed great golf or great drama either way.
Anonymous Pro: Even though the Players has a one-hole playoff at the island-green 17th and it's a playoff that can be decided by an unlucky gust of wind, it's still more exciting than watching a full 18 on Monday.
Van Sickle: Right, it's easy to think about a memorable playoff like Rocco versus Tiger or Hale Irwin versus Mike Donald and forget some of the clunkers.
Hack: It doesn't matter what we think. The Tiger-Rocco playoff ensured another 100 years of 18-hole playoffs.
And the Winner Is ...

